wco81 wrote:Bill Simmons podcast briefly discussed Aaron Gordon for CJ.
Bill Simmons is a clown of the 1st order, he just says **** to get a reaction. Nothing intelligent or useful will come out of his dung-hole of a mouth.
Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem
wco81 wrote:Bill Simmons podcast briefly discussed Aaron Gordon for CJ.
Blazinaway wrote:Plenty of minutes for Zach as we have a 3 man PF/C rotation with Nurk/Zach/Gordon, Aminu plays some situational PF and he and Hark man the SF spot. It might open a trade of Hark or Aminu - perhaps to get under the tax? Intresting idea, however I think an SF similar to talent level of Gordon is a better trade target
Soulyss wrote:Blazinaway wrote:Plenty of minutes for Zach as we have a 3 man PF/C rotation with Nurk/Zach/Gordon, Aminu plays some situational PF and he and Hark man the SF spot. It might open a trade of Hark or Aminu - perhaps to get under the tax? Intresting idea, however I think an SF similar to talent level of Gordon is a better trade target
Trading CJ for Gordon does not make us better. It's at best a horizontal move. The only reason you trade CJ is if you get a significantly better player (CJ + assets) or you get back two young pieces who could surpass him in value.
Wizenheimer wrote:Soulyss wrote:Blazinaway wrote:Plenty of minutes for Zach as we have a 3 man PF/C rotation with Nurk/Zach/Gordon, Aminu plays some situational PF and he and Hark man the SF spot. It might open a trade of Hark or Aminu - perhaps to get under the tax? Intresting idea, however I think an SF similar to talent level of Gordon is a better trade target
Trading CJ for Gordon does not make us better. It's at best a horizontal move. The only reason you trade CJ is if you get a significantly better player (CJ + assets) or you get back two young pieces who could surpass him in value.
first off, I'm not impressed with the idea of a CJ for Gordon swap. Maybe I just haven't seen enough of Gordon. I guess I wouldn't object to it much but I think it might be wasting an opportunity, even though I'm not a big fan of CJ's game. Is Gordon the best Portland could do?...maybe, but it seems a bit light
I do think there are more reasons to trade CJ then what you listed though, not the least of which is the very real ceiling I see on the Dame/CJ back court; It's there and they are butting against it, both on the court, and in Portland's salary cap. And the return can take more forms then you mentioned. But Blazers won't be trading CJ for a better player then CJ. Maybe a better fit. But more likely it would be the first step in a remodel. You can't demolish half a kitchen and replace it in the same day. It takes more time and more steps
wco81 wrote:I don't think AG is some defensive stalwart. But he has size and athleticism. Could he have fared better trying to defend AD or Mirotic than others on the Portland roster?
I imagine he could be effective in the transition game, if he grabs the rebound, gets it to a guard and sprints down the court, looking for lobs. Or if he could come off his man at the right time to help an possibly contest or block shots, which would lead to turnovers and a transition the other way..
wco81 wrote: Travis Outlaw used to play like that for the Trailblazers, usually defending the wings with his length and get out on the break. He wasn't a great shooter but for a couple of seasons, he seemed to hit every open jumper.
Blazers98 wrote:wco81 wrote: Travis Outlaw used to play like that for the Trailblazers, usually defending the wings with his length and get out on the break. He wasn't a great shooter but for a couple of seasons, he seemed to hit every open jumper.
I think I remember Outlaw's shooting differently than you do.
Soulyss wrote:Blazinaway wrote:Plenty of minutes for Zach as we have a 3 man PF/C rotation with Nurk/Zach/Gordon, Aminu plays some situational PF and he and Hark man the SF spot. It might open a trade of Hark or Aminu - perhaps to get under the tax? Intresting idea, however I think an SF similar to talent level of Gordon is a better trade target
Trading CJ for Gordon does not make us better. It's at best a horizontal move. The only reason you trade CJ is if you get a significantly better player (CJ + assets) or you get back two young pieces who could surpass him in value.
Still, the bidding war among Boston, Philadelphia and the Lakers never materialized. The Los Angeles Clippers, Denver, Phoenix, Portland, Toronto and Washington are among teams who've talked with San Antonio, league sources said.
As examples, no Blazers package includes Damian Lillard or CJ McCollum, league sources said. Because Leonard is a player teams fear could be a one-year rental, many offers are modified.
HoopsFanAZ wrote:With Jerry West working with the Clippers, I wouldn't be surprised to see him get Kawhi in trade as the rumored offers are understandably underwhelming. However, it takes just one GM willing to roll the dice. It's not a matter of desperation as it is one GM deciding that getting fired if it goes south isn't as bad as the slow death of being a middling playoff team.
Wizenheimer wrote:not only will Kawhi almost certainly be a 1 year rental for any team but the Lakers, he also has health concerns; and the way he handled this last season is pretty disturbing. Maybe his uncle isn't as bad as Levar Ball but it sounds like he's close to as bad.
if he wanted to torpedo his own trade value, he couldn't have done a more thorough job
I agree. The situation is so strange. The potential salary loss is massive and his reputation has taken a massive hit. He's about the most introverted NBA player out there so its really hard to see any enough incremental sponsorship money being there in LA to offset all the salary he's pissing away. He seems to be getting a lot of really bad advice or he must really be homesick.Wizenheimer wrote:not only will Kawhi almost certainly be a 1 year rental for any team but the Lakers, he also has health concerns; and the way he handled this last season is pretty disturbing. Maybe his uncle isn't as bad as Levar Ball but it sounds like he's close to as bad.
if he wanted to torpedo his own trade value, he couldn't have done a more thorough job
Village Idiot wrote:I agree. The situation is so strange. The potential salary loss is massive and his reputation has taken a massive hit. He's about the most introverted NBA player out there so its really hard to see any enough incremental sponsorship money being there in LA to offset all the salary he's pissing away. He seems to be getting a lot of really bad advice or he must really be homesick.Wizenheimer wrote:not only will Kawhi almost certainly be a 1 year rental for any team but the Lakers, he also has health concerns; and the way he handled this last season is pretty disturbing. Maybe his uncle isn't as bad as Levar Ball but it sounds like he's close to as bad.
if he wanted to torpedo his own trade value, he couldn't have done a more thorough job
It looks like Kawhi is going to Toronto for DeRozen, Poetl and a very highly protected 1st. Maybe we should have put CJ on the table but if Leonard bolts to LA next year this deal doesn't turn out very good for Toronto. Also surprised to see San Antonio being willing to take on DeRozen with that contract. Maybe Pops sees an opportunity but I don't consider this a very good return for a guy who was a top 5 player a year ago.Oden2 wrote:Village Idiot wrote:I agree. The situation is so strange. The potential salary loss is massive and his reputation has taken a massive hit. He's about the most introverted NBA player out there so its really hard to see any enough incremental sponsorship money being there in LA to offset all the salary he's pissing away. He seems to be getting a lot of really bad advice or he must really be homesick.Wizenheimer wrote:not only will Kawhi almost certainly be a 1 year rental for any team but the Lakers, he also has health concerns; and the way he handled this last season is pretty disturbing. Maybe his uncle isn't as bad as Levar Ball but it sounds like he's close to as bad.
if he wanted to torpedo his own trade value, he couldn't have done a more thorough job
I think the one aspect of this all that MIGHT make me willing to take a risk is the advantages a team that holds a player's bird rights has. Obviously right now he's looking like he's all la but I still think there's a shot when it comes down to it the fact that he could have another year (a po fifth year) and 8% increases is a selling point. It might not be enough to get a deal done necessarily but hey it's a shot in the dark that could pay dividends.
Nobody thought pg would stay in okc a year ago, he was all la supposedly but okc took that risk and paid more doing so with sabonis and oladipo. Now understand the fear of giving up Cj for nothing and I think the risk is something to at least consider. I don't know if I'd do Cj for kawhi but it's at least intriguing to think about hat lineup in Portland
Return to Portland Trail Blazers