dckingsfan wrote:BlazersBroncos wrote:dckingsfan wrote:I just don't see it. No way that Orlando gives up its 2025 picks. Just zero chance. I guess weirder things have happened.
They are in the driver's seat being able to gracefully tank due to an injury to Paolo. Along with Denver doing poorly, they will be able to continue to build through the draft.
They might do Cole + Howard + 3 future SRP for Simons. But I am guessing they would rather tank (just a wild guess).
I figure the pick protection could be something along the lines of 'lower of ORL / DEN 2025 FRP lotto protected - if both picks are in lotto PDX recieves 2 future SRP'.
Hedges ORL very well to ensure they dont give up a good FRP. Could even make it Top-20 protected and I would still do it.
I guess it is always easier to shoot down a trade than make a proposal... sorry about that.
And yes, ANY FRP that allows us to move Simons for contracts that expire at the same time is a win. Plus, Jett will be another of those long wings that can shoot a 3.
One thing - the trade doesn't work

Gary Harris can't be traded until December 15th, then it would work. Probably something like a 3 for 2 \preferably 3 for 3
Simons and (1) of Walker\Reath\Banton for Anthony\Harris\Howard & either ORL or DEN 25' 1st.
I do not see the inclusion of that pick as an issue, as either pick will likely be mid\late 1st & ORL has (2) 1st's in 2025. The negotiating IMO would be over whether POR can get the better\worse of the two.
I don't see any want\need for ORL to tank this year. Banchero is not out for the year (2 months most likely) and the EC is in flux enough that they can still make the playoffs while missing him for a major part of the year. Adding a scorer like Simons could help offset the scoring loss of Banchero, and they are not giving away any rotation players of note in order to get him. That is a win\win.
ORL is $20.5mil!! under the luxury tax, so they could take 1-2 players back along with Simons and still stay well under the tax.
A side benefit of sending (2) other players back with Simons (3 for 3 deal) is that it would shave another $4-5mil off their payroll, getting them to $7-8mil under the luxury tax, which could be useful in future trades.