Roy The Natural wrote:GreenRiddler wrote:OMG HAKRLESS IS COMPLAINING TO QUICK RIGHT NOW ABOUT HIS ROLE LIKE HE WASN"T LITERALLY GIVEN WIDE OPEN SHOTS ALL YEAR THAT HE BRICKED.
How do we run plays for a guy that can't even shoot open shots or dribble, we gotta trade him at this point. HELL PLAY LAYMAN AT THE STARTING SF.
The guy has the gull to blame the coaches or insinuate we only run stuff for Dame CJ and Nurk. LIKE YOU ARE LITERAL GARBAGE MY MAN RUNNING PLAYS WON"T MAKE YOUR JUMPER GOOD. YOU ARE LUCKY DAME EVEN SAVED YOUR CAREER AFTER NO OTHER TEAM IN THE LEAGUE OFFERED YOU A CONTRACT.
I can't wait for Harkless to journeyman his way around the league and be gone before he is 30.
Meh.... he's right though... this offense is a MAAAASSSSSIVVVEEE step back from previous years. It's basically buddy ball right now. Nothing is run for other players, there's no diversity in the offense.... it stinks. Yea... Harkless isn't great or anything, but in all honesty, he's also right. Does nobody else watch this offense and get the distinct notion that we're watching 3 guys taking turns jacking up and bricking bad shots, all the while getting free reign to do so? It's like we're playing with a bunch of Carmelo's on offense, it's gross.
Downtown wrote: There's not much we can do but if Harkless starts to deflect blame for his poor play rather than take responsibility for it and accept any changes Stotts might make then that's absolute poison that can filter through the whole group and lays a negative vibe that's hard to come out of.
I read the article and I didn't get the vibe that Harkless was deflecting all blame for his play. I tend to agree with RTN that Harkless is mainly trying figure out what his role is in the offense because there's been some significant changes from last season, and none of them appear to be changes for the better
* Portland ranks 28th in opponent turnovers a game
* Portland is dead last in fast break points/game:
26 Utah 8.0
27 Cleveland 8.0
28 Chicago 7.9
29 New York 6.4
30 Portland 4.5
last season Portland was 22nd at 11.3 points/game. That's a massive drop of nearly 7 points a game in a season in which 6 of 8 losses have been by less then 7 points
* Portland is dead last in FG% at the rim:
26 Los Angeles Clippers .607
27 Phoenix Suns .603
28 Chicago Bulls .602
29 Boston Celtics .582
30 Portland Trail Blazers .561
the gaps in those two stats above between 30th place Portland and the 29th place teams are sizable.
* last season, Portland ranked 11th in the NBA in offensive rating at 110.3 (points/100-possessions). This season, they rank 21st at 104.8. Again, that's a huge drop in offensive efficiency.
* and, perhaps most important, Portland's assists/game numbers have cratered. Last season, they ranked 23rd at 21.1 assists/game. This season, once again, they rank dead last at 17.6. Their assisted FG rate on 2ptFG's has dropped from .444 to .413; and on 3ptFG's it's dropped massively from .789 to .713.
it's become and even heavier
iso-one-on-one-hero-ball offense then it was last season and it's easily argued that it was too heavy last season
now, I'd think the common wisdom would be that adding a low post big-man who has mobility and passing ability would help ball movement, assist rates, and open shot opportunities. But that sure hasn't happened for Portland. And with significantly reduced ball movement and assist rates, a player like Harkless is going to have difficulty finding his offense role. That has obviously happened
all that's not to excuse Harkless completely. But everywhere you look statistically you can see a marked difference between last year and now. His usage rate has dropped from 15.2% too 11.6% and his FGA's have dropped from 8.1 to 5.6. You can even see it on the glass: his defensive rebounding rate has improved from 10.8% to 11.9%, but his offensive rebounding rate has fallen from 6.2% to 3.7%. In other words, his def reb rate indicates the effort is there, but his off reb rate indicates he's lost in the offensive flow, what little flow there is