Soulyss wrote:Porter will not contribute at CJ's level, who also provides critical floor spacing. Don't get me wrong I like Porter if he is really healthy... but this sort of swap moves Portland backwards... the 23-24 million is irrelevant because ditching CJ doesn't give us space.
it's not irrelevant, and it's also not about cap-space....if it was, Crabbe would still be a Blazer and so would Vonleh. I think people are kidding themselves if they believe that Portland is not going to make moves with a major consideration toward the tax level
as for contributing at CJ's level, keep in mind that the level of CJ's scoring is based upon shot attempts. CJ is 23rd in scoring but 11th in FGA's. Dame is scoring 4.4 more points a game but only attempt 0.5 more shots. CJ has the 19th highest salary, but of players averaging 12 minutes a game of more he ranks 77th in PER, 80th in TS%, 79th in winshares/48, 88th in box plus/minus, 50th in assist rate, and 47th in value over replacement. He's a long ways from being a bargain
this team is built around Dame & CJ; they use close to 45% of all the possessions. Dame is the franchise player and has proven over the last 6 years what his value is to the team. If you think that this team is pretty close to it's ceiling but don't want to see a complete rebuild, then the most logical place by far to change the dynamic of the team is CJ. We know it's not going to happen under the current management, but it sure should be considered
now, I know next to nothing about Porter. I'm poor at evaluating college talent unless it's somebody like Durant. I was just responding to your idea that exchanging a contract that has nearly 28M/year over the next 3 years for a rookie scale contract "doesn't solve anything". It might not, but there are good & legitimate reasons it might.