Vince carter? Should we be interested?
Moderators: DeBlazerRiddem, Moonbeam
Vince carter? Should we be interested?
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 940
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Vince carter? Should we be interested?
My key question is should we have an interest in Vince as he could likely be had pretty cheaply IMO. NJ seems to be blowin it up. Would you guys think something like Raef and then Webs or Jack or Frye (or some combo of them) and this yrs pick could get it done? Would you want it done?
Vince just turned 31, still scoring over 20 PPG, his extension he just signed has 3 more years after this at an avg of 16 mil or so.
Is he worth considering or not?
Vince just turned 31, still scoring over 20 PPG, his extension he just signed has 3 more years after this at an avg of 16 mil or so.
Is he worth considering or not?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,275
- And1: 1,400
- Joined: May 27, 2007
Well, for one, his contract sucks, for what we would get out of him. He would play out of position at SF for us, and doesn't offer the 3 point shooting we need with Roy dominating the ball. He quit on his team in Toronto when things weren't going great for him, and my guess is he is part of the reason Kidd doesn't like it in NJ.
- breaker91
- Starter
- Posts: 2,125
- And1: 1
- Joined: Apr 07, 2007
- Location: Portland, where meniscus tears happen
- mojomarc
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 16,838
- And1: 999
- Joined: Jun 01, 2004
- Location: Funkytown
cucad8 wrote:Well, for one, his contract sucks, for what we would get out of him. He would play out of position at SF for us, and doesn't offer the 3 point shooting we need with Roy dominating the ball.
Not that I want Carter, but he is a career 37.5% three point shooter and has been over 40% several times in his career. That makes him a pretty darned good three point shooter. Not James Jones or Kapono, but darned good.
He quit on his team in Toronto when things weren't going great for him, and my guess is he is part of the reason Kidd doesn't like it in NJ.
That's a better reason not to like him, along with the fact that he is a bit injury prone historically, seems to have peaked production-wise, and yet still has several very expensive years contract-wise. I'm of the philosophy that it's almost always better to cut a player loose one year too early than one year too late from both a trade and a chemistry perspective, but in Vince's case it would be Rod Thorne doing the one-year early cut.
Pass.
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 795
- And1: 0
- Joined: Oct 13, 2005
- Location: Cowgirl County
I lobbied for a Zach trade for Carter. But tht was to get us some national attention and a change from Zach. That was also when we were nowhere near the playoffs.
Carter disappears in the playoffs! Even in his prime he never took things over. With JKidd and Jefferson all firing he played TERRIBLY. he's just not a play-off player. Plus the injuries...I'm not sure how many more he can take.
(I would accept him for Raef and Darius. Nothing else ie raef and Joel etc.)
Carter disappears in the playoffs! Even in his prime he never took things over. With JKidd and Jefferson all firing he played TERRIBLY. he's just not a play-off player. Plus the injuries...I'm not sure how many more he can take.
(I would accept him for Raef and Darius. Nothing else ie raef and Joel etc.)
- BlackMamba
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 16,297
- And1: 81
- Joined: Jun 20, 2004
- Location: Cd. de M
-
- Low-Ki
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,093
- And1: 2
- Joined: Aug 13, 2002
What about Jason Kidd? I apologize if there is another thread that I overlooked. But it just makes a lot of sense to me. You have Lafrentz' contract that instantly makes any trade doable with Kidd, and have the plethora of non-core youngsters that should interest NJ.
Rip Hamilton is a stain on the Pistons franchise.
- TheRipCityGuru
- Junior
- Posts: 355
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 27, 2007
- Contact:
Return to Portland Trail Blazers