Page 1 of 3
Rick Adelman
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 5:11 pm
by Il_Devo
Rick Adelman teams win when they are undermanned, and when they have no all-star/superstar.
Why can't Nate McMillan teams win when they are undermanned, but DO have an all-star/superstar?
I hope KP sets his target on Adelman this summer... he would be PERFECT in a glorious return to Portland.
Anyone with me on this?
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 5:16 pm
by Telfaire
Amen. Does he finish his conrtract with the Rockets, though?
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 5:42 pm
by benefit1970
We should never have let Clyde let him go!
-bg
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 5:55 pm
by Wizenheimer
as was mentioned in a couple of other treads last week, some Rockets' fans are saying there's a little bit of friction between Adelman and Houston's GM. Those fans wouldn't be surprised if Adelman isn't re-signed or extended by the Rockets
I agree that he would be a great replacement coach for Nate. Rick has a great reputation amongst his former players, and he's definitely superior to Nate in X's & O's.
I think he'd also represent a logical evolution from 'sarge' to a coach that treats his players like men instead of controlling them so much.
I've never like how much time he invests in whining to officials though. Before the Jailblazers in the Whitsitt era, they were the CryBlazers in the Adelman era. Thanks bryan gumbel
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 6:20 pm
by Fitz303
I would love to get Adelman back. However, would Paul Allen want him back? Would Adelman WANT to come back and coach for Allen? It would be great to have him back, I just dont know how realistic it would be
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 6:38 pm
by Norm2953
You've got to remember there were other issues in addition to Clyde that got
Adelman fired. I think its more likely the team would turn to Terry Porter if they
decided to fire Nate but someone like Lorenzo Romar who currently is the UW
coach might be worth remembering for we all know he would have the complete
support of Roy.
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 6:40 pm
by Shem
The thing is I'm not even confident that this is Nate's last season in Portland. I wish it was!
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 6:41 pm
by LicketyBrindle
Wizenheimer wrote:as was mentioned in a couple of other treads last week, some Rockets' fans are saying there's a little bit of friction between Adelman and Houston's GM. Those fans wouldn't be surprised if Adelman isn't re-signed or extended by the Rockets
I agree that he would be a great replacement coach for Nate. Rick has a great reputation amongst his former players, and he's definitely superior to Nate in X's & O's.
I think he'd also represent a logical evolution from 'sarge' to a coach that treats his players like men instead of controlling them so much.
I've never like how much time he invests in whining to officials though. Before the Jailblazers in the Whitsitt era, they were the CryBlazers in the Adelman era. Thanks bryan gumbel
It is not friction between Rick and the GM as much as it is Rick and the owner. The owner is psycho. Rick and him defiitely don't see eye to eye on most things. Next year is a team option year for Rick and it is highly doubtful (for many reasons) that the owner is going to offer him an extension. Without an extension Rick would be in a lame duck situation and Hou won't want that. That is why I think he will be let go after this year. There is only one other place Rick will coach after Hou and that would be Por. I think he will retire if he isn't coaching Por after he is done in Hou.
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 7:17 pm
by mojomarc
If there is any way we can get Rick back, do it and don't think twice. He's a considerably better coach than Nate is.
In terms of the crying, Adelman does his share but so does Jerry Sloan, Pops, and Larry Brown, three guys who are unquestionably in the discussion among the best coaches in the game. Even Phil Jackson, the king of Zen, chirps his share. Nate, on the other hand, virtually never does. I guess he thinks he frown is convincing enough or something

Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:00 pm
by PDXKnight
Rick>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nate. Clearly. If he's willing to come back sign him, period.
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:02 pm
by Andre 2999
Yeah, pretty easy choice. Do it KP/PA!
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:10 pm
by farzi
Nate will be locked up in a 6 year contract, duh.
I want Hubie Brown personally, but Adelman would be awesome
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:33 pm
by Klinky
Man, this might be one of the things that keeps me going! It is good news if we could get Adelman and send McMuffin on his way.
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:30 pm
by Guy986
LicketyBrindle wrote:Wizenheimer wrote:as was mentioned in a couple of other treads last week, some Rockets' fans are saying there's a little bit of friction between Adelman and Houston's GM. Those fans wouldn't be surprised if Adelman isn't re-signed or extended by the Rockets
I agree that he would be a great replacement coach for Nate. Rick has a great reputation amongst his former players, and he's definitely superior to Nate in X's & O's.
I think he'd also represent a logical evolution from 'sarge' to a coach that treats his players like men instead of controlling them so much.
I've never like how much time he invests in whining to officials though. Before the Jailblazers in the Whitsitt era, they were the CryBlazers in the Adelman era. Thanks bryan gumbel
It is not friction between Rick and the GM as much as it is Rick and the owner. The owner is psycho. Rick and him defiitely don't see eye to eye on most things. Next year is a team option year for Rick and it is highly doubtful (for many reasons) that the owner is going to offer him an extension. Without an extension Rick would be in a lame duck situation and Hou won't want that. That is why I think he will be let go after this year. There is only one other place Rick will coach after Hou and that would be Por. I think he will retire if he isn't coaching Por after he is done in Hou.
Are you some kind of Rockets insider? Because this is certainly news to me. If you're not and just Bsing well... GTFO.
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:33 am
by LicketyBrindle
Guy986 wrote:LicketyBrindle wrote:Wizenheimer wrote:as was mentioned in a couple of other treads last week, some Rockets' fans are saying there's a little bit of friction between Adelman and Houston's GM. Those fans wouldn't be surprised if Adelman isn't re-signed or extended by the Rockets
I agree that he would be a great replacement coach for Nate. Rick has a great reputation amongst his former players, and he's definitely superior to Nate in X's & O's.
I think he'd also represent a logical evolution from 'sarge' to a coach that treats his players like men instead of controlling them so much.
I've never like how much time he invests in whining to officials though. Before the Jailblazers in the Whitsitt era, they were the CryBlazers in the Adelman era. Thanks bryan gumbel
It is not friction between Rick and the GM as much as it is Rick and the owner. The owner is psycho. Rick and him defiitely don't see eye to eye on most things. Next year is a team option year for Rick and it is highly doubtful (for many reasons) that the owner is going to offer him an extension. Without an extension Rick would be in a lame duck situation and Hou won't want that. That is why I think he will be let go after this year. There is only one other place Rick will coach after Hou and that would be Por. I think he will retire if he isn't coaching Por after he is done in Hou.
Are you some kind of Rockets insider? Because this is certainly news to me. If you're not and just Bsing well... GTFO.
It's not BS. I'm not a Rockets insider. Let's just say I have some knowledge when it comes to Adelman. I'll leave it at that.
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:42 am
by The Sebastian Express
BUT I DONT WANT TO LEAVE IT AT THAT.
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:21 am
by PDXKnight
LicketyBrindle wrote:It's not BS. I'm not a Rockets insider. Let's just say I have some knowledge when it comes to Adelman. I'll leave it at that.
With due respect, why should we trust a ballboy err freshman who's credibility is unknown?
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:29 am
by LicketyBrindle
Oden2 wrote:LicketyBrindle wrote:It's not BS. I'm not a Rockets insider. Let's just say I have some knowledge when it comes to Adelman. I'll leave it at that.
With due respect, why should we trust a ballboy err freshman who's credibility is unknown?
If that's your criteria for "validation" then I guess you shouldn't. Furthermore, I am not looking for validation or credibility. I was just passing on some info regarding Rick. Take it or leave it. I'm not trying to start anything with anyone.....just giving some information that you probably can't hear elsewhere.
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 3:31 am
by Guy986
And where did you get that information from?
Re: Rick Adelman
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 3:39 am
by The Sebastian Express
Can we please stop with the ballboy and freshman knocks, really?