ImageImageImageImageImage

Exactly what we've been saying all along

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,808
And1: 37,037
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Exactly what we've been saying all along 

Post#1 » by RIPskaterdude » Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:06 pm

We should sticky this..from the Bee this morning

http://www.sacbee.com/100/story/711636.html

Reportedly, the Denver Nuggets want to trade bruising/borderline dirty role player Eduardo Najera and a first-round draft choice for Kings forward Ron Artest. Well, if you were the Nuggets, wouldn't you?

Yet, since that deal hasn't been done, we know Kings basketball president Geoff Petrie hasn't lost his mind.

Najera for Artest? Come now. Najera, who turns 32 in July, is a nice cat to come off any bench. He hustles and hustles and hustles, then he hustles some more. And he does have a contract that expires at the end of the season.

If I'm Petrie, and I've talked with him so often through the years there is a concept of the way he thinks, there is a need
Image
User avatar
SacTown Kings
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,857
And1: 177
Joined: May 12, 2003

 

Post#2 » by SacTown Kings » Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:18 pm

I think we all know this already. It is all the other fans on realgm that can't get this through their head. They seem to think that us getting junk while helping our competitors is a good deal compared to Artest just walking. Petrie will not do any teams any favors. If we don't get something of value then we let Artest walk and let other teams deal with over paying or going into the lux tax. And when I say value I mean something more than a role player like Najera, or an expiring contract (because Artest is essentially expiring), or a late first. None of those are of any value to the Kings.
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,808
And1: 37,037
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

 

Post#3 » by RIPskaterdude » Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:29 pm

SacTown Kings wrote:I think we all know this already. It is all the other fans on realgm that can't get this through their head. They seem to think that us getting junk while helping our competitors is a good deal compared to Artest just walking. Petrie will not do any teams any favors. If we don't get something of value then we let Artest walk and let other teams deal with over paying or going into the lux tax. And when I say value I mean something more than a role player like Najera, or an expiring contract (because Artest is essentially expiring), or a late first. None of those are of any value to the Kings.


Exactly...that's why we need to sticky it 8)
Image
chrbal
RealGM
Posts: 21,528
And1: 1,976
Joined: Mar 02, 2001
Contact:

 

Post#4 » by chrbal » Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:50 pm

Thats not a bad trade IF there is ABSOLUTELY no other option. Team should get something for him.
User avatar
Piranha
Junior
Posts: 275
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 10, 2002

Re: Exactly what we've been saying all along 

Post#5 » by Piranha » Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:34 pm

xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:We should sticky this..from the Bee this morning

http://www.sacbee.com/100/story/711636.html

If I'm Petrie, and I've talked with him so often through the years there is a concept of the way he thinks, there is a need
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,075
And1: 1,952
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#6 » by Ballings7 » Fri Feb 15, 2008 12:07 am

Pretty well said ^, Piranha.

I wouldn't do the deal. And, last I heard on Najera/R1 pick, it wasn't wanted, and maybe couldn't be done.

I'd be OK with it, because we get something, but still, meh. Also don't like Ron too much for Denver. Helps them partially, but isn't a solid fit. I'd hope Ron leaves them in the summer.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: Exactly what we've been saying all along 

Post#7 » by Smills91 » Fri Feb 15, 2008 3:03 am

[quote="Piranha"][/quote]

I gotta disagree with #2...if we deal artest that signals rebuild, rebuild equals FUTURE assets...not other teams starters, especially from the contenders...the problem is these teams(well their fans at least) want their cake and eat it too. You gotta give to get, and if you want the present, then you must mortgage some future.
deNIEd
Banned User
Posts: 4,942
And1: 30
Joined: Jul 18, 2006

Re: Exactly what we've been saying all along 

Post#8 » by deNIEd » Fri Feb 15, 2008 5:39 am

Smills91 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I gotta disagree with #2...if we deal artest that signals rebuild, rebuild equals FUTURE assets...not other teams starters, especially from the contenders...the problem is these teams(well their fans at least) want their cake and eat it too. You gotta give to get, and if you want the present, then you must mortgage some future.


Most of these teams HAVE no future to mortgage out.
Suns, Boston, Spurs, now Mavs have absolutley nothing.
Lakers don't have anything anymore (Bynum won't be traded for
anything)

Our best bet, is either TPE and Atl 1st for Artest (asking anymore and Sun's won't want to do it)

Or, trading EVERYONE ELSE but keeping Artest. And rebuilding via Martin/Artest/Hawes, but meaning trade Bibby + Miller immediatley
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Exactly what we've been saying all along 

Post#9 » by SacKingZZZ » Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:30 am

Piranha wrote:
xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:We should sticky this..from the Bee this morning

http://www.sacbee.com/100/story/711636.html

If I'm Petrie, and I've talked with him so often through the years there is a concept of the way he thinks, there is a need

Return to Sacramento Kings