backer55 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Where i live, all the rocker chicks are either biker babes with tats on their foreheads and dandruff or tweekers with busted teeth and no credit. Gimmie a country girl in a flannel shirt, bangs, and a nice smile. Oh, and country girls love getting loved and listening to good music, country music!
Of corse i been down a lot of roads, you got most of yours in front of you. To each his own.
backer55 wrote:KIE, i understand. Does irritate me though when guys come on like that dude the other nite just to stirr the pot and rile folks. I must say that i was impressed with your handeling of that situation. I thought i had read in the rules where trollers weren't allowed. Anyway, being that's not the case as you say, i'm glad to now be better informed.
mitchweber wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Ehh, it could also imply letting one's team lose. If a game is winnable and you choose to play players that aren't necessarily the combination that will most likely result in a win, that's really not too far from tanking IMO.
KingInExile wrote:We are all striving for this, though
except Smills, he's striving for
Smills91 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Damn straight! That was the most enjoyable game of the season for me. That and the W over the Lakers. But the W over the GS basically adds additional probability that they get the #14 pick in the draft, which would be very pleasing to me. VERY pleasing!
SacKingZZZ wrote:Denver's looking like bigger and bigger idiots by the day for passing up on Artest for what they would have had to give up. That deal would have shot them into the upper tier in the west immediately IMO.
SacKingZZZ wrote:HAHAHA to the W's announcer, towards the end he said, "The Kings are having fun, but maybe they'll have fun watching the Warriors in the playoffs too."
Someone should tell him that they are a game or so out of being in the lotto right next to us.
