Vlade4Life wrote:Why does Randolph have to be a PF?
I didn't say he has to be a PF, it was just in comparision to Thompson, and for us at PF. Thompson and Randolph are quite different as front-court prospects, but the possibility is there of Randolph, turning out to at least sway to being a 4-man.
Generally, who knows what foward Randolph will be primarily, if even having that result later on. Thus, if not having position definition, he would be a tweener foward and more of a bench player, unless on a small-ball team playing PF (except B. Wright is there for the PF spot already on GS). Because of certain weaknesses on both ends at SF or PF, that isn't affordable in being a regular starter, on a conventionally built, competitive team.
How Randolph develops relating to his shooting and how strong/big he becomes will dictate his position situation. Specifically with the shooting, if he doesn't improve on his poor 3PT range (2/12 in college), where he's a respectable threat there, and also doesn't become a strong intermediate shooter? He'll either have to be a PF, or a bench tweener foward, which goes back to how he matures mass-wise.
Randolph could be a PF (ultimately will be smaller mass-wise than a traditional PF, like Odom), could be a SF, could be a tweener (bench)... or he could be able to play either spot with enough strengths in his game, so he's be a starter. Whereas being a tweener, the strengths and weaknesses are of equivalency, that it puts him to the bench. Unless he'd be on a less conventional or non-competitive team... for example starting at PF on speed-ball team, or just being a starter, at one or both foward spots, in the situation of a bad/young/developing team.
If he turns out like Derrick McKey, Odom, or Blatche (as he develops, depending), that'd be a quality turn out.
Right now, you can't say, at least more of, what foward he is, because he's so young and having to develop in various areas.
The serious questionability on some different aspects with Randolph, is partly why I prefer Thompson over Randolph.
Ballings7 wrote:Randolph I don't see generally being a primary/starting/solid PF in this league
I'm going to adjust that a little bit...
Rather than "I don't see", it should be "I question". Because the former is not what I've collectively felt since June and currently.