ImageImageImageImageImage

Free agency, who should/could we go after???

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Free agency, who should/could we go after??? 

Post#61 » by KF10 » Mon May 11, 2009 6:08 am

deNIEd wrote:
Beno isn't "terrible" he deserves to play in the league. However, he is "terrible" in perspective to how much he's getting paid.

Just like Kenny Thomas and Mikki Moore, neither are "terrible" players and capable of putting up 10/10 on any given night, but neither deserve their contract.

I was all for Beno....when he was making 500k a year. 5 mil a year? Not so much.


Well, at 5 mil per year, that is MLE level pay. The problem is that the duration of the contract makes Beno's contract unwanted IMO. If it was a 3 year contract, I would see his contract actually decent. Beno is MLE talent but the duration of his contract is bad.
User avatar
Draino
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,872
And1: 14
Joined: Jan 09, 2005
     

Re: Free agency, who should/could we go after??? 

Post#62 » by Draino » Mon May 11, 2009 3:27 pm

i love how these teams lock up players for long term deals and then try everything in their power to get rid of that same player after a year or two
Image
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: Free agency, who should/could we go after??? 

Post#63 » by Smills91 » Mon May 11, 2009 3:30 pm

Draino wrote:i love how these teams lock up players for long term deals and then try everything in their power to get rid of that same player after a year or two

Yeah I agree. I think teams should be allowed ONE MAX year contract of 5 years, and every contract after that can only be a 3 year max deal.

Return to Sacramento Kings