ImageImageImageImageImage

Channing Frye?

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

SactownHrtBrks8
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,978
And1: 68
Joined: Jun 10, 2004
 

Channing Frye? 

Post#1 » by SactownHrtBrks8 » Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:23 am

If he comes for about 9 million over 2 years I don't think he would be a bad pickup as a backup big
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Channing Frye? 

Post#2 » by KF10 » Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:44 am

I highly doubt it.

It is known that he does not like Sacramento for a while. And besides, his style of play, while considering the team's direction isn't really great IMO.
User avatar
down_el_road
Senior
Posts: 588
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
Location: Somewhere in Europe.

Re: Channing Frye? 

Post#3 » by down_el_road » Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:59 am

we dont need a soft big man who only shoots jumpers anymore.
wd707
Banned User
Posts: 809
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 15, 2008

Re: Channing Frye? 

Post#4 » by wd707 » Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:17 am

Yuck channing frye. Are you serious?
SactownHrtBrks8
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,978
And1: 68
Joined: Jun 10, 2004
 

Re: Channing Frye? 

Post#5 » by SactownHrtBrks8 » Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:20 am

I forgot about his hate of Sacramento, I guess thats a no go
User avatar
KM44
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,942
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 17, 2007

Re: Channing Frye? 

Post#6 » by KM44 » Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:26 am

^Hahaha, minute detail. Plus he isn't the exact mold of a body-banger that we would look for.
Nicky Nix Nook wrote:In two years:

Thompson > Aldridge
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Channing Frye? 

Post#7 » by SacKingZZZ » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:41 am

My nightmare is such a scenario. Literally a one dimensional jumpshooting big. A good one, but provides NOTHING else. Think Brad Miller without the passing. No thanks.
User avatar
perezident
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,823
And1: 73
Joined: Mar 12, 2009
Location: On the beautiful island of the Bahamas. Where I was born
       

Re: Channing Frye? 

Post#8 » by perezident » Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:34 pm

Im really of the impression that he'll be a king though.. sigh

Ideally it should be Bass though
Smills91 wrote:You guys are idiots....
If you sleep on Beno, he can drop 30/10 on you.

^Shall remain until this happens :rofl:

theo42 wrote:If you think Philly isn't getting better you will be shocked with how they play this year.

^ :lol: (7/4/15)
rwheeler
Junior
Posts: 251
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 21, 2007
Location: 916

Re: Channing Frye? 

Post#9 » by rwheeler » Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:02 pm

NO THANKS! Hopefully this doesn't happen. I'm pretty sure Petrie is really looking to add a big body to help out defensively and bring some more toughness to the team. Frye just doesn't make sense in that regard.
can we just get a new arena already...
cdt3
Rookie
Posts: 1,183
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 17, 2008

Re: Channing Frye? 

Post#10 » by cdt3 » Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:59 pm

I think we would take Diogu for less than $3mil over Frye at $4.5mil for an offensive backup. I don't know who we would want as a defensive backup, I think that's why we drafted Brockman. I think Rodriguez and the cheapest guys available as the 11/12/13 guys. I think we will keep Simmons as one because of his shotblocking at least in practice.

I see us spending our money on one pretty complete big not a defensive or offensive guy maybe Kleiza he is 6'8" and only plays off the bench because of Melo. I think he and Diogu are very similar although I have seen Kleiza hit 1 game winner for the bronze winning Lithuanian team in the Olympics. I think he adds clutchness and mental toughness to the bigs a little more than Diogu.

If you want to be a contender you need address the clutchness problem that was very severe last year with all the youth. Which was why we added Evans and the only other clutch G BJax likely won't be back so we have to add another clutch role player or 2 so we can squeak out close ones.
User avatar
Nicky Nix Nook
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,672
And1: 153
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Contact:
       

Re: Channing Frye? 

Post#11 » by Nicky Nix Nook » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:17 pm

I'd take Mikki "4 and 4" Moore over Frye
User avatar
Dustin5566
Veteran
Posts: 2,804
And1: 64
Joined: Jul 23, 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: Channing Frye? 

Post#12 » by Dustin5566 » Wed Jul 1, 2009 2:39 am

Why does he hate Sacramento?
Image
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: Channing Frye? 

Post#13 » by Smills91 » Wed Jul 1, 2009 2:47 am

Dustin5566 wrote:Why does he hate Sacramento?


He got shut down by some chick downtown and his teammates wouldn't let it go....
User avatar
dub010
Sophomore
Posts: 114
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 30, 2008

Re: Channing Frye? 

Post#14 » by dub010 » Wed Jul 1, 2009 6:47 am

We really dont want/need Channing
User avatar
UKF
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,810
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Contact:

Re: Channing Frye? 

Post#15 » by UKF » Wed Jul 1, 2009 3:32 pm

No to Channing Frye. No

Dude is as ugly as his game

Return to Sacramento Kings