ImageImageImageImageImage

too bad Sacramento didn't buy a pick in the draft

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

kobyz
Rookie
Posts: 1,117
And1: 308
Joined: Oct 31, 2006

too bad Sacramento didn't buy a pick in the draft 

Post#1 » by kobyz » Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:44 am

too bad they didn't buy the #17 or #18 pick in the draft like Wizards and Clippers!
Avery Bradley would have been nothing less then perfect for the Kings, exactly what they needs, fantastic fit to Evans and to the team, athletic guard, superb defender and great shooter!
Brendonlv15
Ballboy
Posts: 25
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 14, 2010

Re: too bad Sacramento didn't buy a pick in the draft 

Post#2 » by Brendonlv15 » Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:41 am

Was a huge fan of Bledsoe pre-draft so it wasnt fun watching Sam Presti jump all over Miami then continue to pawn him off to the Clippers.

Bledsoe hasnt been brilliant in SL but I thought he was a nice fit for Tyreke. More than Bradley because of his ball handling and ability to run the point.
boogydown
Banned User
Posts: 26,221
And1: 15
Joined: Dec 14, 2004

Re: too bad Sacramento didn't buy a pick in the draft 

Post#3 » by boogydown » Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:15 pm

Adam Morrison is also fantastic in the summer league. So was Lonny Baxter.

It's the summer league people.
User avatar
Draino
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,872
And1: 14
Joined: Jan 09, 2005
     

Re: too bad Sacramento didn't buy a pick in the draft 

Post#4 » by Draino » Sat Jul 17, 2010 5:08 pm

Morrison coming out of college, everyone knew he wouldn't be good in the NBA... and he's not...

BRADLEY... is the real deal, I don't know how some people just don't SEE it.... its very simple, I personally think the Kings should have done everything they can go get to the 17-18 range and get Bradley, but too late now... What they SHOULD do now is go after Jerryd Bayless or Mike Conley, I think they would both be perfect for this team.
troydestroy
Ballboy
Posts: 19
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 18, 2010

Re: too bad Sacramento didn't buy a pick in the draft 

Post#5 » by troydestroy » Sat Jul 17, 2010 5:50 pm

i disagree. without having to trade or spend any addt'l money, the Kings now have two tall, long post players who offer many things we haven't had in a while (shot blocking, consistent post-moves, tough rebounding, etc.)

Bradley may be a baller- don't know much about him, but the Kings will find another efficient dribbler/shooter/defender to compliment Evans and Udrih no prob.
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,813
And1: 37,037
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: too bad Sacramento didn't buy a pick in the draft 

Post#6 » by RIPskaterdude » Sat Jul 17, 2010 6:51 pm

If Whiteside didn't fall to the Kings, they may have just sold their 2nd round pick, so be glad that we at least picked somebody...
Image
User avatar
Draino
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,872
And1: 14
Joined: Jan 09, 2005
     

Re: too bad Sacramento didn't buy a pick in the draft 

Post#7 » by Draino » Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:17 am

well I'm not saying trade the whiteside pick for him.. but we could have done something (a lot of teams got picks for cheap)... oh well, what's done is done, we did great in the draft again
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,813
And1: 37,037
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: too bad Sacramento didn't buy a pick in the draft 

Post#8 » by RIPskaterdude » Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:27 am

Draino wrote:well I'm not saying trade the whiteside pick for him.. but we could have done something (a lot of teams got picks for cheap)... oh well, what's done is done, we did great in the draft again


Yes, and again, if Whiteside didn't fall to us, we would have probably sold our 2nd round pick, so what does that tell you about the chances of us BUYING a pick?
Image

Return to Sacramento Kings