ImageImageImageImageImage

Danny Granger is not Untouchable.

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

Indy2thaWindy
Banned User
Posts: 10,619
And1: 16
Joined: Jun 15, 2010
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Re: Danny Granger is not Untouchable. 

Post#101 » by Indy2thaWindy » Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:17 am

It had nothin to do with race.
dozencousins
Analyst
Posts: 3,031
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 11, 2007

Re: Danny Granger is not Untouchable. 

Post#102 » by dozencousins » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:48 am

Indy2thaWindy wrote:It had nothin to do with race.


RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT !

It's not only amazing your trolling here but more amazing you come on this board starting drama with me knowing I have never prior to your posting in reguards to me I had never said 2 words to you !

You need to not only stop trolling but quit looking to pick fights not only with those you dont know but also people you hadnt spoken before to !

SAVE THE DRAMA FOR YOUR MOMMA !
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Danny Granger is not Untouchable. 

Post#103 » by SacKingZZZ » Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:04 am

Indy2thaWindy wrote:[edit - ICMTM] Personal attack not necessary


And the only thing on the Kings that woyuld probably interest the Pacers for Granger is Cousins. BUT, I already know how all of you feel about that. I don't think people remember there was supposedly a deal right before the draft that was the Nets 3rd overall pick and Devin Harris for Danny Granger. We could easily have had cousins ourselves. I'd rather have Favors myself.


Yeah, and then THIS SEASON happened. Had everyone had their crystal balls out I'm pretty sure Demarcus Cousins would be playing in Philly or New Jersey right now. That and the balance between the apparent reluctance and the willingness of the Pacers front office to trade Granger has shifted to a degree. Granger is NOT a number one option, if he was on the Kings he would be a number 3 option moving forward. You want superstar value for him, keep waiting. I'd bring a good book if I were you, might be a long time.
Bobo the King
Ballboy
Posts: 48
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 09, 2005

Re: Danny Granger is not Untouchable. 

Post#104 » by Bobo the King » Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:04 am

Hey bdgking, did you read my post on page 6? If you have, I suggest you read it again.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Danny Granger is not Untouchable. 

Post#105 » by SacKingZZZ » Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:06 am

If the Pacers were interested in letting Granger go, even a little, I think by the deadline a Thompson/Casspi/top 3 protected #1 pick would be hard to pass up and trump any other "rebuilding" package they could get elsewhere.
User avatar
boogie-reke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,919
And1: 244
Joined: Nov 05, 2010
   

Re: Danny Granger is not Untouchable. 

Post#106 » by boogie-reke » Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:28 am

SacKingZZZ wrote:
Indy2thaWindy wrote:[edit - ICMTM] Personal attack not necessary

And the only thing on the Kings that woyuld probably interest the Pacers for Granger is Cousins. BUT, I already know how all of you feel about that. I don't think people remember there was supposedly a deal right before the draft that was the Nets 3rd overall pick and Devin Harris for Danny Granger. We could easily have had cousins ourselves. I'd rather have Favors myself.


Yeah, and then THIS SEASON happened. Had everyone had their crystal balls out I'm pretty sure Demarcus Cousins would be playing in Philly or New Jersey right now. That and the balance between the apparent reluctance and the willingness of the Pacers front office to trade Granger has shifted to a degree. Granger is NOT a number one option, if he was on the Kings he would be a number 3 option moving forward. You want superstar value for him, keep waiting. I'd bring a good book if I were you, might be a long time.


+1
dozencousins
Analyst
Posts: 3,031
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 11, 2007

Re: Danny Granger is not Untouchable. 

Post#107 » by dozencousins » Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:07 pm

Bobo the King wrote:Hey bdgking, did you read my post on page 6? If you have, I suggest you read it again.


[edit - ICMTM] Don't feel the need to explain yourself. You're fine. We also discourage people from sharing personal information. For your own safety leave the discussions at your opinions of basketball.
ICMTM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,347
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
     

Re: Danny Granger is not Untouchable. 

Post#108 » by ICMTM » Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:27 pm

bdgking wrote:To bookie-reke & sacking101

Calling me out LMAO Save your breath you will get nowhere their is nothing I mean nothing you can say no type of sarcasim you can use that will get to me so keep trying fellas but you will fail .

To Boba the KING : I appreciate your advise about caps lock etc. Some of that is my doing but the majority of the time I ahve been having computer issues & I dont know how to fix the particular problem & It would take me to long on this board in a message to ask anyones help as to how I fix it !

No disrespect to you Boba please dont offer me advise unless I ask fort it . Most people who offer it without the other asking for it are generally being rude & or sarcastic . I am not saying you are or were but your message was awfully long & not neccessary to be so long .

Sometimes when I disagree with 1 persons point I noticed their are alot of people who act like childesh high school kids they jump right in and look to defend that person even if they disagreed with that person its like 1 buddy just sticking up for another , Additionaly their are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooo many people on this board who only read partially what 1 person says vs. the whole thing then they take 1 small fraction of what that person says & they use that against them . I feel thats idiotic & cowardly it sounds like a reporter were they cut out a small part of what someone says & they make it appear that the person said something simular but different .
Then from there alot of people only run their comments based on that .

Example : If i said Hey Boba the KING you post all great posts all the time but this last post you suck !

Someone starting unwanted problems might insinuate I am saying Boba the king you suck when thats not even remotely what I said !


I thought Bobo the King was trying to help you out, and not attack you for what it's worth.

The value of Granger is he can do damage without the ball. He torched us this year and he did it off the ball. He's never going to be the #1 guy because it's not his game. I think he's a perfect fit here. I also feel Casspi, and a #1 pick (assuming we'd rather take Granger than the pick itself) is sufficient. If you don't think so. It's just not meant to be.
KANGZZZZZ!
dozencousins
Analyst
Posts: 3,031
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 11, 2007

Re: Danny Granger is not Untouchable. 

Post#109 » by dozencousins » Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:09 am

ICMTM wrote:
bdgking wrote:To bookie-reke & sacking101

Calling me out LMAO Save your breath you will get nowhere their is nothing I mean nothing you can say no type of sarcasim you can use that will get to me so keep trying fellas but you will fail .

To Boba the KING : I appreciate your advise about caps lock etc. Some of that is my doing but the majority of the time I ahve been having computer issues & I dont know how to fix the particular problem & It would take me to long on this board in a message to ask anyones help as to how I fix it !

No disrespect to you Boba please dont offer me advise unless I ask fort it . Most people who offer it without the other asking for it are generally being rude & or sarcastic . I am not saying you are or were but your message was awfully long & not neccessary to be so long .

Sometimes when I disagree with 1 persons point I noticed their are alot of people who act like childesh high school kids they jump right in and look to defend that person even if they disagreed with that person its like 1 buddy just sticking up for another , Additionaly their are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooo many people on this board who only read partially what 1 person says vs. the whole thing then they take 1 small fraction of what that person says & they use that against them . I feel thats idiotic & cowardly it sounds like a reporter were they cut out a small part of what someone says & they make it appear that the person said something simular but different .
Then from there alot of people only run their comments based on that .

Example : If i said Hey Boba the KING you post all great posts all the time but this last post you suck !

Someone starting unwanted problems might insinuate I am saying Boba the king you suck when thats not even remotely what I said !


I thought Bobo the King was trying to help you out, and not attack you for what it's worth.

The value of Granger is he can do damage without the ball. He torched us this year and he did it off the ball. He's never going to be the #1 guy because it's not his game. I think he's a perfect fit here. I also feel Casspi, and a #1 pick (assuming we'd rather take Granger than the pick itself) is sufficient. If you don't think so. It's just not meant to be.


To be clear ICMTM I thankyou for helping this situation out !
Additionaly I want you & boba the king to know I have no problem what so ever with him . i just explained my situation wich I usually dont like to do for the very reasons you mentioned I shouldnt I felt that I had no other way for people to realize I do my best here & do not try to break rules or write badly etc. I also explained myself as their has been other past incidents were another member may mention about my writing etc. I was hoping to clear that up to avoid personel attacks later !
Finally to be clear my issue was with the Indiana PACER poster not anyone from our board .
I do not know why he was coming after me as prior to his post on this topic I had never said 2 words to him / her !

Anyways thank you ( icmtm & boba the king for all your help )

I hope you would respond in kind so we all know I have no problem with either of you.
User avatar
Nicky Nix Nook
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,672
And1: 153
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Contact:
       

Re: Danny Granger is not Untouchable. 

Post#110 » by Nicky Nix Nook » Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:37 am

Bobo the King wrote:Hey bdgking, did you read my post on page 6? If you have, I suggest you read it again.


I must say, that post was truly excellent and helpful.
dozencousins
Analyst
Posts: 3,031
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 11, 2007

Re: Danny Granger is not Untouchable. 

Post#111 » by dozencousins » Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:47 am

Nicky Nix Nook wrote:
Bobo the King wrote:Hey bdgking, did you read my post on page 6? If you have, I suggest you read it again.


I must say, that post was truly excellent and helpful.



I agree & again I thank him for all his efforts it was very kind of him to try to help .
In all honesty I just dont understand how to do most of it so if it seems I am not taking the advise I just hope he & all of you dont think I am not trying to .

Again boba the king

thankyou

Return to Sacramento Kings