ImageImageImageImageImage

KINGS

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

swissfosho
Ballboy
Posts: 12
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 22, 2010

KINGS 

Post#1 » by swissfosho » Sun Jun 12, 2011 8:40 pm

I say we go after Sessions. What do you guys think?
User avatar
Bac2Basics
RealGM
Posts: 13,588
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 03, 2001
Location: "Are you like a crazy person? I'm quite sure they will say so."
   

Re: KINGS 

Post#2 » by Bac2Basics » Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:30 pm

What makes you think that's a good idea?
I'm thinking that Sacramento should aim higher.
Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanity over humanity, nothing exceeds most of the criticisms made on the habits of the poor by the well-housed, well-warmed, and well-fed.
~ Herman Melville
User avatar
YC42Balla
Rookie
Posts: 1,054
And1: 62
Joined: May 30, 2010
Location: NorCal

Re: KINGS 

Post#3 » by YC42Balla » Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:31 pm

IDK - sessions is a great talented young player, but I truly believe we're going to be drafting a guard; Jimmer, perhaps? Who knows. Anyways, I think we should focus on targeting SF's in the FA.

Interesting subject title by the way. It's so broad; I laughed a little.
SAC-RA-MEN-TO #HEREWESTAYED
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: KINGS 

Post#4 » by SacKingZZZ » Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:12 pm

Need shooters, slashers aren't a priority.
swissfosho
Ballboy
Posts: 12
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 22, 2010

Re: KINGS 

Post#5 » by swissfosho » Mon Jun 13, 2011 12:11 am

Ya you guys are proly right. I just think Sessions is very underated and we could get him for cheap. We def need a S/F and someone who can shoot the three. I like Brandon Wright or Jimmer. I like Kemba but i dont see him working with Tyreke, I can see them bumping heads. Thx for the responses.
User avatar
longfellow44
Head Coach
Posts: 6,032
And1: 243
Joined: May 04, 2007
Location: Washinton DC

Re: KINGS 

Post#6 » by longfellow44 » Mon Jun 13, 2011 4:06 am

Sessions is the wrong type of guard for us. His lack of a consistent 3pt shot is what makes him a terrible fit. I think we need to look at trading back in the draft a bit to move Beno for shorter contracts and then go ahead and draft Jimmer. Then focus on a small forward in free agency.
moosachi
Freshman
Posts: 67
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 20, 2009

Re: KINGS 

Post#7 » by moosachi » Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:37 pm

so im guessing were giving up on casspi and greene?
Gymbo
Ballboy
Posts: 25
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2009

Re: KINGS 

Post#8 » by Gymbo » Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:29 pm

Would you be interested in something like:

Ramon Sessions and J.J. Hickson for Francisco Garcia and #7?

It would give you a lineup of something like:

PG: Udrih/Sessions
SG: Evans/Thornton (assume re-sign)
SF: Free Agent/Casspi/Greene
PF: Hickson/Whiteside
C: Cousins/Thompson

The trade would still allow you to preserve a decent amount of cap space (depending on what happens with the CBA).
dozencousins
Analyst
Posts: 3,031
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 11, 2007

Re: KINGS 

Post#9 » by dozencousins » Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:18 pm

Gymbo wrote:Would you be interested in something like:

Ramon Sessions and J.J. Hickson for Francisco Garcia and #7?

It would give you a lineup of something like:

PG: Udrih/Sessions
SG: Evans/Thornton (assume re-sign)
SF: Free Agent/Casspi/Greene
PF: Hickson/Whiteside
C: Cousins/Thompson

The trade would still allow you to preserve a decent amount of cap space (depending on what happens with the CBA).


Not really trying to be rude at all .
The trade you mentioned has to be a joke right ?? I mean its almost laughable. Its not even close to fair for the Kings .
User avatar
PaKwAn
Analyst
Posts: 3,006
And1: 1,564
Joined: Dec 04, 2007

Re: KINGS 

Post#10 » by PaKwAn » Wed Jun 15, 2011 4:23 pm

Gymbo wrote:Would you be interested in something like:

Ramon Sessions and J.J. Hickson for Francisco Garcia and #7?

It would give you a lineup of something like:

PG: Udrih/Sessions
SG: Evans/Thornton (assume re-sign)
SF: Free Agent/Casspi/Greene
PF: Hickson/Whiteside
C: Cousins/Thompson

The trade would still allow you to preserve a decent amount of cap space (depending on what happens with the CBA).


i dont see the cavs trading jj for a 7th pick in a weak draft with questionable prospects.... he will benefit the most having kyrie irving on that team...
SadKingsFan
RealGM
Posts: 10,340
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
Location: Sacramento CA
 

Re: KINGS 

Post#11 » by SadKingsFan » Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:53 am

PaKwAn wrote:
i dont see the cavs trading jj for a 7th pick in a weak draft with questionable prospects.... he will benefit the most having kyrie irving on that team...

Doesn't matter what the cavs would do. Kings wouldn't want him
User avatar
PaKwAn
Analyst
Posts: 3,006
And1: 1,564
Joined: Dec 04, 2007

Re: KINGS 

Post#12 » by PaKwAn » Thu Jun 16, 2011 4:19 pm

SadKingsFan wrote:
PaKwAn wrote:
i dont see the cavs trading jj for a 7th pick in a weak draft with questionable prospects.... he will benefit the most having kyrie irving on that team...

Doesn't matter what the cavs would do. Kings wouldn't want him



im not sure about that, right now jt is the only real pf we got.. jj would be a nice fit next to cuz because he is a good shotblocker,athletic and a good rebounder as well... im not a fan of sessions but jj is a nice player in this league.. sac would listen if the cavs offered jj...

Return to Sacramento Kings