KINGS
KINGS
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 12
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
KINGS
I say we go after Sessions. What do you guys think?
Re: KINGS
- Bac2Basics
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,588
- And1: 3
- Joined: Mar 03, 2001
- Location: "Are you like a crazy person? I'm quite sure they will say so."
-
Re: KINGS
What makes you think that's a good idea?
I'm thinking that Sacramento should aim higher.
I'm thinking that Sacramento should aim higher.
Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanity over humanity, nothing exceeds most of the criticisms made on the habits of the poor by the well-housed, well-warmed, and well-fed.
~ Herman Melville
~ Herman Melville
Re: KINGS
- YC42Balla
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,054
- And1: 62
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: NorCal
Re: KINGS
IDK - sessions is a great talented young player, but I truly believe we're going to be drafting a guard; Jimmer, perhaps? Who knows. Anyways, I think we should focus on targeting SF's in the FA.
Interesting subject title by the way. It's so broad; I laughed a little.
Interesting subject title by the way. It's so broad; I laughed a little.
SAC-RA-MEN-TO #HEREWESTAYED
Re: KINGS
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: KINGS
Need shooters, slashers aren't a priority.
Re: KINGS
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 12
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: KINGS
Ya you guys are proly right. I just think Sessions is very underated and we could get him for cheap. We def need a S/F and someone who can shoot the three. I like Brandon Wright or Jimmer. I like Kemba but i dont see him working with Tyreke, I can see them bumping heads. Thx for the responses.
Re: KINGS
- longfellow44
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,032
- And1: 243
- Joined: May 04, 2007
- Location: Washinton DC
Re: KINGS
Sessions is the wrong type of guard for us. His lack of a consistent 3pt shot is what makes him a terrible fit. I think we need to look at trading back in the draft a bit to move Beno for shorter contracts and then go ahead and draft Jimmer. Then focus on a small forward in free agency.
Re: KINGS
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 25
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 25, 2009
Re: KINGS
Would you be interested in something like:
Ramon Sessions and J.J. Hickson for Francisco Garcia and #7?
It would give you a lineup of something like:
PG: Udrih/Sessions
SG: Evans/Thornton (assume re-sign)
SF: Free Agent/Casspi/Greene
PF: Hickson/Whiteside
C: Cousins/Thompson
The trade would still allow you to preserve a decent amount of cap space (depending on what happens with the CBA).
Ramon Sessions and J.J. Hickson for Francisco Garcia and #7?
It would give you a lineup of something like:
PG: Udrih/Sessions
SG: Evans/Thornton (assume re-sign)
SF: Free Agent/Casspi/Greene
PF: Hickson/Whiteside
C: Cousins/Thompson
The trade would still allow you to preserve a decent amount of cap space (depending on what happens with the CBA).
Re: KINGS
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,031
- And1: 135
- Joined: Jan 11, 2007
Re: KINGS
Gymbo wrote:Would you be interested in something like:
Ramon Sessions and J.J. Hickson for Francisco Garcia and #7?
It would give you a lineup of something like:
PG: Udrih/Sessions
SG: Evans/Thornton (assume re-sign)
SF: Free Agent/Casspi/Greene
PF: Hickson/Whiteside
C: Cousins/Thompson
The trade would still allow you to preserve a decent amount of cap space (depending on what happens with the CBA).
Not really trying to be rude at all .
The trade you mentioned has to be a joke right ?? I mean its almost laughable. Its not even close to fair for the Kings .
Re: KINGS
- PaKwAn
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,006
- And1: 1,564
- Joined: Dec 04, 2007
Re: KINGS
Gymbo wrote:Would you be interested in something like:
Ramon Sessions and J.J. Hickson for Francisco Garcia and #7?
It would give you a lineup of something like:
PG: Udrih/Sessions
SG: Evans/Thornton (assume re-sign)
SF: Free Agent/Casspi/Greene
PF: Hickson/Whiteside
C: Cousins/Thompson
The trade would still allow you to preserve a decent amount of cap space (depending on what happens with the CBA).
i dont see the cavs trading jj for a 7th pick in a weak draft with questionable prospects.... he will benefit the most having kyrie irving on that team...
Re: KINGS
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,340
- And1: 5
- Joined: Jun 26, 2006
- Location: Sacramento CA
-
Re: KINGS
PaKwAn wrote:
i dont see the cavs trading jj for a 7th pick in a weak draft with questionable prospects.... he will benefit the most having kyrie irving on that team...
Doesn't matter what the cavs would do. Kings wouldn't want him
Re: KINGS
- PaKwAn
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,006
- And1: 1,564
- Joined: Dec 04, 2007
Re: KINGS
SadKingsFan wrote:PaKwAn wrote:
i dont see the cavs trading jj for a 7th pick in a weak draft with questionable prospects.... he will benefit the most having kyrie irving on that team...
Doesn't matter what the cavs would do. Kings wouldn't want him
im not sure about that, right now jt is the only real pf we got.. jj would be a nice fit next to cuz because he is a good shotblocker,athletic and a good rebounder as well... im not a fan of sessions but jj is a nice player in this league.. sac would listen if the cavs offered jj...