ImageImageImageImageImage

McLemore evaluation

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: McLemore evaluation 

Post#21 » by City of Trees » Wed Jan 15, 2014 7:47 am

KF10 wrote:He is playing too fast, rushing his shots and his confidence is low right now. Not a good thing at all.
this is true but the sad/scary part is Ben has actually slowed down a lot from say- when he got the starting job over Thornton. Not good.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
Kings2013
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,829
And1: 932
Joined: Jul 18, 2013
Location: The beautiful capital of California

Re: McLemore evaluation 

Post#22 » by Kings2013 » Wed Jan 15, 2014 7:59 am

KF10 wrote:He is playing too fast, rushing his shots and his confidence is low right now. Not a good thing at all.


Confidence seems to be a key issue, I have no doubt. The question is would any of the say top 20 SGs in the league have had such a drastic confidence problem in their rookie seasons? In other words would a confidence this shakable lend itself to an overly productive career? Or it doesn't matter?
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: McLemore evaluation 

Post#23 » by KF10 » Wed Jan 15, 2014 8:04 am

City of Trees wrote:
KF10 wrote:He is playing too fast, rushing his shots and his confidence is low right now. Not a good thing at all.
this is true but the sad/scary part is Ben has actually slowed down a lot from say- when he got the starting job over Thornton. Not good.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using RealGM Forums mobile app


Yeah, you are right.

The thing about Ben is that he is still adjusting his range from college to NBA. His shot looks picture-perfect but the results are not there yet.

It's hard to get into rhythm when he is bricking 3pter after 3pter. He should settle down and try to look other ways to score imo.

Right now, him & Thornton, are the weakest links whenever they are with the starting unit.
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: McLemore evaluation 

Post#24 » by KF10 » Wed Jan 15, 2014 8:15 am

Kings2013 wrote:
KF10 wrote:He is playing too fast, rushing his shots and his confidence is low right now. Not a good thing at all.


Confidence seems to be a key issue, I have no doubt. The question is would any of the say top 20 SGs in the league have had such a drastic confidence problem in their rookie seasons? In other words would a confidence this shakable lend itself to an overly productive career? Or it doesn't matter?


It's hard to say because Ben was characterized as passive and lacks a "go to" mentality. When dealing with these type of players, confidence is HUGE for them imo. They need to feel confident with their abilities to perform at the level of their talent. Right now, Ben's confidence is probably at its lowest and his shots looks a lot more rushed than usual lately. To me, he is having a difficult time adjusting the NBA's 3PT line imo. I can't explain it but there is no way a shooter this good is missing OPEN looks at a 3pter if it doesn't involves a combination of lack of confidence and adjustment of college's 3pter to NBA's 3pters imo.
sacking123
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,464
And1: 1,348
Joined: Jul 23, 2004
Location: Office
Contact:
 

Re: McLemore evaluation 

Post#25 » by sacking123 » Wed Jan 15, 2014 11:32 am

Honestly I am not too worried about Ben at the moment. Yeah it would be great if he was showing more, but I am sure the coaches are teaching him different skills that will eventually allow him to become a very good player. With a player like Ben I won't worry about him until about this time next season to be honest.
I think he is improving things, but we aren't at the moment and won't see the proof until at least next season. Just my opinion but I think he is quite tired after all of the workouts etc prior to the draft and everything between then and now and I think Malone will look to play him according to his condition for a while. So look for him to close out the season strong in the last 12-15 games or maybe more.
Sacramento Kings
Sydney Kings
SacKingsPejaFan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,627
And1: 114
Joined: May 27, 2010
Location: New York, NY

Re: McLemore evaluation 

Post#26 » by SacKingsPejaFan » Wed Jan 15, 2014 3:51 pm

There's nothing to worry about. Ray Allen averaged 13 points as a rookie. Harden averaged 9 points as a rookie and 12 points as a sophomore. Tracy McGrady averaged 7 points as a rookie, 9 points as a sophomore, and 15 points as a third-year. Steve Nash was garbage his first FOUR years in this league and he has 2 MVP's. With some simple googling I could go on and on and on. Most stars this league has seen took time to develop.

Hell, Zach Randolph averaged 2 points and 2 rebounds as a rookie, 8 and 4 as a sophomore. Jermaine O'Neal averaged LESS than 4 points and 4 rebounds for his first FOUR years in the league. I wouldn't be surprised if T-Rob turns into a beast later on. It's foolish to assume guys are going to suck forever just because they don't put up numbers early in their career.
Big_Cat
Banned User
Posts: 547
And1: 123
Joined: Jan 08, 2014

Re: McLemore evaluation 

Post#27 » by Big_Cat » Wed Jan 15, 2014 4:05 pm

SacKingsPejaFan wrote:There's nothing to worry about. Ray Allen averaged 13 points as a rookie. Harden averaged 9 points as a rookie and 12 points as a sophomore. Tracy McGrady averaged 7 points as a rookie, 9 points as a sophomore, and 15 points as a third-year. Steve Nash was garbage his first FOUR years in this league and he has 2 MVP's. With some simple googling I could go on and on and on. Most stars this league has seen took time to develop.

Hell, Zach Randolph averaged 2 points and 2 rebounds as a rookie, 8 and 4 as a sophomore. Jermaine O'Neal averaged LESS than 4 points and 4 rebounds for his first FOUR years in the league. I wouldn't be surprised if T-Rob turns into a beast later on. It's foolish to assume guys are going to suck forever just because they don't put up numbers early in their career.


We've said that about so many of our rookies/young players the past few years. At some point we need to be realistic with expectations and redirect the course earlier instead of foolishly waiting for something that most likely will never occur (Not saying this specifically about McLemore...need to watch more of his tape...but in general)
Brapman
Starter
Posts: 2,221
And1: 443
Joined: Nov 28, 2012

Re: McLemore evaluation 

Post#28 » by Brapman » Wed Jan 15, 2014 8:42 pm

The problem with McLemore is that his unconfident, dispassionate and low IQ play were knocks on him coming into the draft. Also, I pointed out pre-draft (somewhere on the Real GM boards) that his agility numbers at the Chicago pre-draft camp were terrible. That's always the measurement I think of as the key measurement to look at by us fans when predicting whether guards will be great/bad defenders in the NBA. Finally, his handle coming into the draft was a massive concern: he sucked in that department, and that suggests that he's way more limited as a player than his size and speed and jumping ability would otherwise indicate. He's proving that these concerns about him might be accurate.

I don't think this kid has what it takes to be a great player, and said as much pre-draft. On the other hand, I do think he could become a great 3 pt shooter if he can gain confidence. Hard to do that when you are the 5th option on the floor, and have a hard time getting on the floor or the ball when he's on the floor given you've got gunner Gay, gunner Boogie, and gunner Thomas on the roster.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: McLemore evaluation 

Post#29 » by SacKingZZZ » Wed Jan 15, 2014 11:28 pm

He's still playing a role that isn't that of a 7th pick selected based on his offense. It's almost like he's being put into the role of a 36 year old Ray Allen after years of experience. They need to find a way to move him to the bench and find a way to get him into the offense or move him period, because his value will only decline in this role much like we've seen plenty of the last few years with similarly poorly utilized offensively players. I guess they could just wait if his value isn't super high because I think he has the potential to transition into the type of player they need but it's going to take a few years.
User avatar
YC42Balla
Rookie
Posts: 1,054
And1: 62
Joined: May 30, 2010
Location: NorCal

Re: McLemore evaluation 

Post#30 » by YC42Balla » Thu Jan 16, 2014 10:21 am

I read the title as "McLemore Elevation." Haha. Wow.
SAC-RA-MEN-TO #HEREWESTAYED
enderwilson
Pro Prospect
Posts: 778
And1: 152
Joined: Jun 23, 2011
 

Re: McLemore evaluation 

Post#31 » by enderwilson » Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:19 pm

Big_Cat wrote:
SacKingsPejaFan wrote:There's nothing to worry about. Ray Allen averaged 13 points as a rookie. Harden averaged 9 points as a rookie and 12 points as a sophomore. Tracy McGrady averaged 7 points as a rookie, 9 points as a sophomore, and 15 points as a third-year. Steve Nash was garbage his first FOUR years in this league and he has 2 MVP's. With some simple googling I could go on and on and on. Most stars this league has seen took time to develop.

Hell, Zach Randolph averaged 2 points and 2 rebounds as a rookie, 8 and 4 as a sophomore. Jermaine O'Neal averaged LESS than 4 points and 4 rebounds for his first FOUR years in the league. I wouldn't be surprised if T-Rob turns into a beast later on. It's foolish to assume guys are going to suck forever just because they don't put up numbers early in their career.


We've said that about so many of our rookies/young players the past few years. At some point we need to be realistic with expectations and redirect the course earlier instead of foolishly waiting for something that most likely will never occur (Not saying this specifically about McLemore...need to watch more of his tape...but in general)


I agree with this, but only if we're talking about waiting until next year for the TEAM to improve. I'm one of the ones whose lost patience with the "wait for the draft" and "we'll turn things around next year" approach. All evidence points to this strategy being flawed when we're thinking about improving the team as a whole.

On and individual player basis however, I have to agree with SacKingPejaFan. Having a rookie, even one that is drafted high, come out and put up double digit points and filling the stat sheets is not the norm. The reason why we have ROY awards is to recognize the two or three rookies who are the exceptions. None of the players mentioned above were ROY but had the talent to become stars and super-stars once they found their way in the NBA. We all know that Ben is talented, he just needs to do more yoga or eastern meditation or something to "find himself" and be at peace with his game. It's scary to think about giving up on him not halfway through his rookie campaign and watch him find his inner super-star on some other team.
Big_Cat
Banned User
Posts: 547
And1: 123
Joined: Jan 08, 2014

Re: McLemore evaluation 

Post#32 » by Big_Cat » Thu Jan 16, 2014 5:27 pm

enderwilson wrote:I agree with this, but only if we're talking about waiting until next year for the TEAM to improve. I'm one of the ones whose lost patience with the "wait for the draft" and "we'll turn things around next year" approach. All evidence points to this strategy being flawed when we're thinking about improving the team as a whole.


Since Webber went down, this team has never fully committed to rebuilding. The plethora of picks we've received hasn't been because we were truly rebuilding, but instead simply because all of the decisions we've made have been absolute garbage.

Looking at how this team has performed the past few weeks (along with the rest of the league), I've fully accepted the fact that we're destined to end up as a treadmill team over the next half decade or so. Unless we become extremely lucky and find a star/superstar late in the draft (ie George/Parker/Manu/etc....but something you can never count on), we won't be receiving any game changing players via the draft. Since we're Sacramento, you can rule out free agency as well. So that leaves trades. I honestly think we might as well trade McLemore now and let some other team see if he reaches his potential, and just shoot for the 6th-8th seed spots over the next 2-3 years. Granted we'll be eliminated the first or second round every year, but that seems to be what the new ownership and what all the fans would rather see anyways.

At some point you just have to accept a championship isn't really obtainable for us and accept the next best thing.

Return to Sacramento Kings