ImageImageImageImageImage

WOJ Kings thinking about firing Karl (Update pg. 3, It's happening per Stein)

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

benchmobbin02
Veteran
Posts: 2,976
And1: 364
Joined: May 28, 2015
     

Re: WOJ Kings thinking about firing Karl (Update pg. 3, It's happening per Stein) 

Post#121 » by benchmobbin02 » Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:36 am

SacKingZZZ wrote:
benchmobbin02 wrote:You are taking a lot of leaps in this post imo.

Bobby is employed by the Kings and said that the coach should be fired. Now having him fired or suspended may be over reactions but it's not Bobby place to say that. It IS the agents place to defend his client.

It is pure speculation that minority owners are the ones that nixed the Karl firing. Vlade himself said today that it is his call alone on coaching issues.



And it's the agents place to demand a media person be fired? Where did he say the coach should be fired?


http://www.ocregister.com/articles/scott-703493-worthy-lakers.html

Bobby never said the word fired but that was what he was clearly implying if you look at the context and aren't trying to make excuses for him. Bobby Jackson is my favorite Kings player ever but it's my opinion that media and commentator employed by an organization shouldn't comment on a whether a fellow employee should be fired. The agent provided solid reasoning as to why. Even Grant Napear, who well respected in the field nation wide, says that it's not his place to comment on whether Karl or Vlade or any one employed by the Kings be fired. That is for their superior to decide and comment on if they deem it appropriate. They can definitely give their opinion on they're job performance.

The agent isn't bound to the team. His only obligation is to his client. I even said that the agent overreacted by suggesting a punishment. But he isn't crossing a line others hold clearly to be correct etiquette in the business by protecting his client. It appears Bobby is. That was my point.

KF10 - The timing of the release of the info was subject to the writer of the above story. In fact, we have no idea when he was sent the email. It was probably right after he heard it on Friday after the game. All we know for sure tho is that the article was posted today.

You said, "I personally think it is well in his rights to analyze and criticize as long as he provides his reasoning. And he did"

Where does Bobby provide reasoning? It is nowhere in the quoted text or the article.
MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!
dozencousins
Analyst
Posts: 3,031
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 11, 2007

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: WOJ Kings thinking about firing Karl (Update pg. 3, It's happening per Stein) 

Post#122 » by dozencousins » Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:37 am

benchmobbin02 wrote:
dozencousins wrote:
benchmobbin02 wrote:
Actually Vlade was just on Grant Napear show and said he has complete autonomy and authority in the coaching decisions.

I think I have explained very clearly my opinion on some of your posts. And that is what it is, opinion. I also try to explain anytime I post something that can be viewed as negative. I don't feel like getting with you personal again. You're free to ignore/block me as well.


Disagreeing is fine but you are making fun of the Bucks member as well as doing the same to me .
I get tired of just about every time I say anything you start something .
You are not staying with just opinions that is a lie . You continue to do nothing but try and start something almost every time I post and you had to poke fun in regards to the bucks member and myself earlier toady . Not very classy .
I have seen a lot of what you write that I could rip into but I don't because we are all entitled to our own thoughts , opinions , facts etc. & we all should act with class . I have better things to do with my time than to rip into you or your thoughts so I don't .

This is my only post to you directly in this thread as this is a thread about Karl & coaching etc.


dozencousins - I went back and looked at my first comment toward the bucks member about you and I apologize. Tho I do believe what I wrote backing it up is true, how I started it was a personal attack on you by saying "why" when he asked for your incite. I was wrong. It was unnecessary. I will try to keep my post on topic.

I would welcome debate or criticism on anything you see me post. I don't shy away from it and I try to defend my positions and if my mind is change I say that too.


I appreciate the response here as well as City & profit explaining .
I am not here to criticize peoples comments or views agree or not everyone is allowed to have their own perspectives and I appreciate that .
I don't expect everyone to agree with all I say or for that matter everyone to believe all I say as their are always haters .
The only thing I do ask anyone is to be civil and respectful we are all fans . As far as I know not to many people on this board knows each other directly to have done anything negative to the other to deserve bashing , insults or to be picked on . I will not do that to others as well agree with them or not .

I have news on the trade board but it will take awhile to post as a bit of info .
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: WOJ Kings thinking about firing Karl (Update pg. 3, It's happening per Stein) 

Post#123 » by KF10 » Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:01 am

benchmobbin02 wrote:
KF10 - The timing of the release of the info was subject to the writer of the above story. In fact, we have no idea when he was sent the email. It was probably right after he heard it on Friday after the game. All we know for sure tho is that the article was posted today.

You said, "I personally think it is well in his rights to analyze and criticize as long as he provides his reasoning. And he did"

Where does Bobby provide reasoning? It is nowhere in the quoted text or the article.


"Where does Bobby provide his reasoning?" I'm referring to his post-game commentary after each Kings game of the past one month or so.
benchmobbin02
Veteran
Posts: 2,976
And1: 364
Joined: May 28, 2015
     

Re: WOJ Kings thinking about firing Karl (Update pg. 3, It's happening per Stein) 

Post#124 » by benchmobbin02 » Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:09 am

KF10 wrote:
benchmobbin02 wrote:
KF10 - The timing of the release of the info was subject to the writer of the above story. In fact, we have no idea when he was sent the email. It was probably right after he heard it on Friday after the game. All we know for sure tho is that the article was posted today.

You said, "I personally think it is well in his rights to analyze and criticize as long as he provides his reasoning. And he did"

Where does Bobby provide reasoning? It is nowhere in the quoted text or the article.


"Where does Bobby provide his reasoning?" I'm referring to his post-game commentary after each Kings game of the past one month or so.


Fair enough, you didn't say that, which is why I asked.
MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!
User avatar
blind prophet
RealGM
Posts: 10,574
And1: 3,306
Joined: Dec 08, 2011
 

Re: WOJ Kings thinking about firing Karl (Update pg. 3, It's happening per Stein) 

Post#125 » by blind prophet » Fri Mar 25, 2016 7:14 am

Denver media believes Kings FO has attempted to get Karl to resign multiple times.

“Once this year here in Denver when they were in town a few weeks ago was enough, although (the conversation) didn’t center on Boogie Cousins, it centered on Sacramento’s obvious attempt – attempts, plural — to get George to resign so they don’t have to pay him the $10 million they owe him on the remainder of his contract … which everybody knows including George, more than anybody else, that’s exactly what’s going on. And actually his relationship with Cousins, at least at that point, was probably better than his relationship with any other element or person within the organization.”

https://www.hoop-ball.com/nba-news-hoop-ball-blog/denver-radio-host-kings-tried-multiple-times-to-get-george-karl-to-resign/

Return to Sacramento Kings