ImageImageImageImageImage

16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

User avatar
PetrieUnderstudy
Rookie
Posts: 1,225
And1: 71
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Location: Folsom, CA

Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35* 

Post#1601 » by PetrieUnderstudy » Thu Jul 6, 2017 11:59 pm

If the Kings have plans to trade Willie for Crowder I really don't want them picking up McGee. I'd like Dewayne Dedmon. He played under Pop and his advanced defensive stats are excellent. Sign him to a contract similar to Kosta (who could be traded). Maybe 3 years $30 million w/3rd yr an option. This also frees up playing time for PapaG.

Hill/Fox/Mason
Bogdanovic/Hield/Temple
Crowder/Richardson/Jackson
Labissiere/Randolph/Giles
Dedmon/Papagiannis
Roddy B for 3
Analyst
Posts: 3,544
And1: 1,042
Joined: Jan 13, 2012
       

Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35* 

Post#1602 » by Roddy B for 3 » Tue Jul 11, 2017 9:06 am

How would Kings fans feel about Wesley Matthews (18.5M this season, player option at 19.5M next season) + Dwight Powell + 2 2nd rounders + Dallas' 2018 1st top 6 protected (indefinitely) for cap space?
7/1/2019
(I broke a mirror on 7-1-2012)
kalenclayton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,634
And1: 1,728
Joined: Feb 13, 2014
 

Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35* 

Post#1603 » by kalenclayton » Tue Jul 11, 2017 10:56 am

Roddy B for 3 wrote:How would Kings fans feel about Wesley Matthews (18.5M this season, player option at 19.5M next season) + Dwight Powell + 2 2nd rounders + Dallas' 2018 1st top 6 protected (indefinitely) for cap space?

The Kings don't have the roster spots (15 already) or cap space (around $10million left) to pull off a deal like this. That being said, this is a Hinkie move and I just don't think that is Vlade's M.O. I personally would think about the trade, but ultimately turn it down. That's a lot of salary to take on which kills our flexibility. That first is likely sitting at #10-14.
sportscrazy
General Manager
Posts: 8,538
And1: 727
Joined: Jul 27, 2002

Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35* 

Post#1604 » by sportscrazy » Thu Jul 27, 2017 4:32 pm

Would the Kings add anything to a Garrett Temple for Wilson Chandler swap to get it done?
Disclaimer: Trades I post shouldn't make you stressed or angry if you disagree. If you say it's unproductive because it won't happen and we're only allowed to post deals that actually happen, it takes away 99% of trades here and the fun out of the board.
kalenclayton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,634
And1: 1,728
Joined: Feb 13, 2014
 

Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35* 

Post#1605 » by kalenclayton » Thu Jul 27, 2017 4:39 pm

sportscrazy wrote:Would the Kings add anything to a Garrett Temple for Wilson Chandler swap to get it done?

Hey sportscrazy.
I don't see how what Wilson Chandler would bring would help the Kings in the long run. The Kings need continuity and consistency in the worst way. Temple has been such a wonderful addition in the lockerroom and he helps on the court as well. Chandler wouldn't help as much off the court and his talent would be wasted in Sac. I don't see this trade pairing likely.
Darren
RealGM
Posts: 14,084
And1: 913
Joined: Nov 06, 2003

Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35* 

Post#1606 » by Darren » Thu Jul 27, 2017 5:31 pm

Mavs fan here, Matthews and Barea for Randolph and Carter makes sense for both teams. Any interest?
kalenclayton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,634
And1: 1,728
Joined: Feb 13, 2014
 

Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35* 

Post#1607 » by kalenclayton » Thu Jul 27, 2017 5:58 pm

Darren wrote:Mavs fan here, Matthews and Barea for Randolph and Carter makes sense for both teams. Any interest?

As I said in the proposal from sportscrazy, the Kings need continuity and consistency. Randolph and Carter were brought in for leadership and I'm sure they are here to stay unless they ask for a trade. There would be no interest in Barea and Matthews on or off the court. They don't help really in any way, shape, or form on this rebuilding team.
VeganKingsFan
Junior
Posts: 288
And1: 81
Joined: May 09, 2017
 

Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35* 

Post#1608 » by VeganKingsFan » Thu Jul 27, 2017 5:59 pm

Darren wrote:Mavs fan here, Matthews and Barea for Randolph and Carter makes sense for both teams. Any interest?

Lol why on Earth would we do that, even if it were even possible? We can't trade players we just signed.
VeganKingsFan
Junior
Posts: 288
And1: 81
Joined: May 09, 2017
 

Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35* 

Post#1609 » by VeganKingsFan » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:02 pm

kalenclayton wrote:
sportscrazy wrote:Would the Kings add anything to a Garrett Temple for Wilson Chandler swap to get it done?

Hey sportscrazy.
I don't see how what Wilson Chandler would bring would help the Kings in the long run. The Kings need continuity and consistency in the worst way. Temple has been such a wonderful addition in the lockerroom and he helps on the court as well. Chandler wouldn't help as much off the court and his talent would be wasted in Sac. I don't see this trade pairing likely.

I know how Wilson Chandler would help our team. He became a vegan and became the healthiest and best player he's ever been. Maybe his healthy vegan diet will rub off on the young Kings lol. Willie already tweeted a response to a vegan documentary where he said we're being lied to by the animal agriculture industry.

Return to Sacramento Kings