If the Kings have plans to trade Willie for Crowder I really don't want them picking up McGee. I'd like Dewayne Dedmon. He played under Pop and his advanced defensive stats are excellent. Sign him to a contract similar to Kosta (who could be traded). Maybe 3 years $30 million w/3rd yr an option. This also frees up playing time for PapaG.
Hill/Fox/Mason
Bogdanovic/Hield/Temple
Crowder/Richardson/Jackson
Labissiere/Randolph/Giles
Dedmon/Papagiannis
16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
- PetrieUnderstudy
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,225
- And1: 71
- Joined: Jul 24, 2005
- Location: Folsom, CA
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,544
- And1: 1,042
- Joined: Jan 13, 2012
-
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
How would Kings fans feel about Wesley Matthews (18.5M this season, player option at 19.5M next season) + Dwight Powell + 2 2nd rounders + Dallas' 2018 1st top 6 protected (indefinitely) for cap space?
7/1/2019
(I broke a mirror on 7-1-2012)
(I broke a mirror on 7-1-2012)
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,634
- And1: 1,728
- Joined: Feb 13, 2014
-
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
Roddy B for 3 wrote:How would Kings fans feel about Wesley Matthews (18.5M this season, player option at 19.5M next season) + Dwight Powell + 2 2nd rounders + Dallas' 2018 1st top 6 protected (indefinitely) for cap space?
The Kings don't have the roster spots (15 already) or cap space (around $10million left) to pull off a deal like this. That being said, this is a Hinkie move and I just don't think that is Vlade's M.O. I personally would think about the trade, but ultimately turn it down. That's a lot of salary to take on which kills our flexibility. That first is likely sitting at #10-14.
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,538
- And1: 727
- Joined: Jul 27, 2002
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
Would the Kings add anything to a Garrett Temple for Wilson Chandler swap to get it done?
Disclaimer: Trades I post shouldn't make you stressed or angry if you disagree. If you say it's unproductive because it won't happen and we're only allowed to post deals that actually happen, it takes away 99% of trades here and the fun out of the board.
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,634
- And1: 1,728
- Joined: Feb 13, 2014
-
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
sportscrazy wrote:Would the Kings add anything to a Garrett Temple for Wilson Chandler swap to get it done?
Hey sportscrazy.
I don't see how what Wilson Chandler would bring would help the Kings in the long run. The Kings need continuity and consistency in the worst way. Temple has been such a wonderful addition in the lockerroom and he helps on the court as well. Chandler wouldn't help as much off the court and his talent would be wasted in Sac. I don't see this trade pairing likely.
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,084
- And1: 913
- Joined: Nov 06, 2003
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
Mavs fan here, Matthews and Barea for Randolph and Carter makes sense for both teams. Any interest?
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,634
- And1: 1,728
- Joined: Feb 13, 2014
-
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
Darren wrote:Mavs fan here, Matthews and Barea for Randolph and Carter makes sense for both teams. Any interest?
As I said in the proposal from sportscrazy, the Kings need continuity and consistency. Randolph and Carter were brought in for leadership and I'm sure they are here to stay unless they ask for a trade. There would be no interest in Barea and Matthews on or off the court. They don't help really in any way, shape, or form on this rebuilding team.
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
-
- Junior
- Posts: 288
- And1: 81
- Joined: May 09, 2017
-
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
Darren wrote:Mavs fan here, Matthews and Barea for Randolph and Carter makes sense for both teams. Any interest?
Lol why on Earth would we do that, even if it were even possible? We can't trade players we just signed.
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
-
- Junior
- Posts: 288
- And1: 81
- Joined: May 09, 2017
-
Re: 16-17 Trade Discussion Thread *Read mod note on pg. 35*
kalenclayton wrote:sportscrazy wrote:Would the Kings add anything to a Garrett Temple for Wilson Chandler swap to get it done?
Hey sportscrazy.
I don't see how what Wilson Chandler would bring would help the Kings in the long run. The Kings need continuity and consistency in the worst way. Temple has been such a wonderful addition in the lockerroom and he helps on the court as well. Chandler wouldn't help as much off the court and his talent would be wasted in Sac. I don't see this trade pairing likely.
I know how Wilson Chandler would help our team. He became a vegan and became the healthiest and best player he's ever been. Maybe his healthy vegan diet will rub off on the young Kings lol. Willie already tweeted a response to a vegan documentary where he said we're being lied to by the animal agriculture industry.