kingjawn100 wrote:i know its not meant to be a negative comparison but the Bogdan comparison is exactly why i WOULDN'T take Luka at 2. When people say Bogi's skill-set worked well last year, it worked well for a guy who realistically is a complimentary/role player. If a guy like that is your best player you simply aren't winning a ton of games.
Although Bogi is crafty and smart there are plays each game where he simply has to give the ball up because he doesn't have the athletic ability to either get to the rim or create separation for a jumper. Luka, while younger, will have some of the same issues, and it's hard to imagine us making deep playoff run when 3 of our 4 best players (luka, bogi, buddy) all have issues getting their own shot.
i don't think ive heard one person say that Luka's gonna be MUCH better than Bogi and that kinda scares me. Can someone break down an area where he is or projects to be MUCH better than Bogi?
At 7 im fine taking the crafty/basketball IQ guy...at 2 i want a superstar who's gonna make the basketball IQ guys/role players look even better.
I don’t think I’ve heard anyone say Bogdanovic is on the same level of player of Doncic. That’s why you play him at PF (your concerns athletically may be justified at the wing) which is his NBA position IMO. Who is the supposed superstar your taking at 2 (all these players have counter arguments)?