He 100% is
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is Richaun Holmes a long term answer at C for the Kings?
Re: Is Richaun Holmes a long term answer at C for the Kings?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,241
- And1: 408
- Joined: Jan 01, 2007
- Location: Sacramento, CA
-
Re: Is Richaun Holmes a long term answer at C for the Kings?
- Throwback24
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,072
- And1: 41,652
- Joined: Jun 17, 2008
Re: Is Richaun Holmes a long term answer at C for the Kings?
- true shooting %: #2
- offensive rating: #2
- offensive win shares: #9
- win shares: #11
- value over replacement player: #19
- offensive rating: #2
- offensive win shares: #9
- win shares: #11
- value over replacement player: #19
Remember when’ is the lowest form of conversation.
Re: Is Richaun Holmes a long term answer at C for the Kings?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: Is Richaun Holmes a long term answer at C for the Kings?
I can't wait to see Fox throwing lobs to him.
Re: Is Richaun Holmes a long term answer at C for the Kings?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: Is Richaun Holmes a long term answer at C for the Kings?
becorz wrote:bleeds_purple wrote:I don't think the fit is great either but there are 48 minutes a game. Once Bagley comes back I expect Dedmon to become a DNP. At that point Holmes and Bagley can share the floor to start the 1st and 3rd and split the remaining 36 minutes a game at the 5. Bjelica and Barnes should play the majority of the minutes at the 4.
I would also like to see Bagley start the 2nd and 4th with our bench units because he thrived in that role last year.
I am still not ready to write Dedmon off. He has a history over the last two years of being a good role player. Once we get Bagley back and especially once we got Fox back, I think Dedmon will start being playable again.
Dedmon can fit but it's starting to look like Walton and crew might be writing him off for you. The last two games he's gone with an 8 man rotation and played Bjelica at center. Walton sometimes goes to players after not playing them multiple games but Dedmon has worked himself into that 4th big at best role from the looks of it.
Re: Is Richaun Holmes a long term answer at C for the Kings?
- City of Trees
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 15,851
- And1: 5,511
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
-
Re: Is Richaun Holmes a long term answer at C for the Kings?
Holmes is absolutely killing it but I'll need to see how the Bagley pairing works.
Re: Is Richaun Holmes a long term answer at C for the Kings?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,464
- And1: 1,348
- Joined: Jul 23, 2004
- Location: Office
- Contact:
-
Re: Is Richaun Holmes a long term answer at C for the Kings?
BoogieTime wrote:Yes, I’ve thought he was the center of the future since the offseason, and have seen nothing to disway that. Onus is now on Bagley to either show he’s a player or he’s a fit with Richaun
Which stupid FA signing rule are you referring to?
This is something I’ve been wanting to give you huge kudos for some time, but for whatever reason I’ve held off, perhaps thinking this run from Holmes won’t continue. And you know what, it won’t, but that doesn’t take away the fact he’s been tremendous for the Kings. We would be bottom few in the league without him and I know many don’t like to give credit, but you called pretty much this so great work!
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Sacramento Kings
Sydney Kings
Sydney Kings