ImageImageImageImageImage

Game 54 Thread - Kings (19-34) @ Warriors (39-13)

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,886
And1: 12,022
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: Game 54 Thread - Kings (19-34) @ Warriors (39-13) 

Post#21 » by LightTheBeam » Fri Feb 4, 2022 4:26 pm

City of Trees wrote:Kuminga is going to be one of the best players from his draft class. Book it
100%

If you did a redraft today, I'd have him at 3 or 4 at The latest. I really only see arguments for Cade, mobley, and Barnes ahead of him. But I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if he ended up the best of the bunch.

Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,886
And1: 12,022
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: Game 54 Thread - Kings (19-34) @ Warriors (39-13) 

Post#22 » by LightTheBeam » Fri Feb 4, 2022 4:53 pm

BoogieTime wrote:
simonbampfield wrote:
RipPizzaGuy wrote:Just a few less wins and maybe we coulda had kuminga :/

Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app


I know you're not high on Davion, but that is strange after he goes for a career night.
Kuminga would be decent too, I get it, but tell me who doesn't look good coming off this Warriors bench and playing with Steph and Klay.


It sounds like its meant to cause trouble. I don't normally respond to the poster, but this is a time period leading up to the trade deadline and beyond where a lot of things will be said, and I can't let some things go without rebuttal, for now. After the roster is congealed I think less will be said where I would feel the need to rebut
This dude just gets mad when you point out the obvious. I mean look how is tone has changed on haliburton in 3 games, I thought it would take him 2 years but he's faster than I thought. King of small sample sizes

Why should we sugar coat what is in front of us because we are fans?

Assessment of mitchell

Age - oldest rookie
Size - wayy too small. Unless he becomes cp3 he is always going to struggle getting his own under the basket
Shooting - inconsistent (though very nice form) would have liked to see better numbers considering his age.
Defense - great man defender, though I'm not sure his team defense will hold up. His size makes it very hard to close out on guys.
Passing - decent, nothing spectacular. 2 lobs last night probably his best passing of the season.

What am I missing? I'm very clear nobody (fox included) on the kings is good enough to build around. If that hurts your feelings then I'm sorry. I try to be realistic not fool myself for hope. 2-3 game sample size doesn't change my opinion. But I'm not surprised considering you quickly labeled haliburton a superstar after his earlier 3 game sample size when the kings were consistently getting blown out.

Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
floppymoose
Senior Mod - Warriors
Senior Mod - Warriors
Posts: 59,258
And1: 17,349
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Trust your election workers

Re: Game 54 Thread - Kings (19-34) @ Warriors (39-13) 

Post#23 » by floppymoose » Fri Feb 4, 2022 8:01 pm

BoogieTime wrote:Kuminga is "spring break" because you never know what he will do. Wiggins 2.0 Bad BBIQ/no range/awkward tweener barreling into the lane

wut?

He's 19.
sacking123
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,464
And1: 1,348
Joined: Jul 23, 2004
Location: Office
Contact:
 

Re: Game 54 Thread - Kings (19-34) @ Warriors (39-13) 

Post#24 » by sacking123 » Fri Feb 4, 2022 8:42 pm

RipPizzaGuy wrote:
simonbampfield wrote:
RipPizzaGuy wrote:Just a few less wins and maybe we coulda had kuminga :/

Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app


I know you're not high on Davion, but that is strange after he goes for a career night.
Kuminga would be decent too, I get it, but tell me who doesn't look good coming off this Warriors bench and playing with Steph and Klay.
It's not even about Davion necessarily. It's just how you need to build a team In today's nba. Wings and forwards are without a doubt the most important position. And the kings haven't had good ones in forever.

Instead we continue to focus on guards and centers. It's a continued recipe for disaster.

Between age, body size, skill set, position.. Kuminga has a chance to become an elite star. Mitchell may become a good starter.

And we all knew that kuminga was very raw coming out. The fact he is doing what he is doing is kinda crazy. Mitchell was a college champion who is 23 and supposed to be polished out the games.

In a sense it's like a Malcolm brogdon vs jaylen brown. Yes brogdon won rookie of the year, but flash forward 6 years and brogdon is basically the same player at 29 years old, and jaylen brown is 25 a star and hasn't even entered his prime.

So again, not even a knock on mitchell. Could become a good player. He won't change a franchise like scottie Barnes or kuminga can.

Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app


That's fair. Spot on about positions. It's why I have said before the Kings drafting strategy should change to mirror Toronto's. Long, speed and players that put in effort.
Does anyone believe we would develop a raw player though?
Sacramento Kings
Sydney Kings
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,886
And1: 12,022
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: Game 54 Thread - Kings (19-34) @ Warriors (39-13) 

Post#25 » by LightTheBeam » Fri Feb 4, 2022 9:10 pm

simonbampfield wrote:
RipPizzaGuy wrote:
simonbampfield wrote:
I know you're not high on Davion, but that is strange after he goes for a career night.
Kuminga would be decent too, I get it, but tell me who doesn't look good coming off this Warriors bench and playing with Steph and Klay.
It's not even about Davion necessarily. It's just how you need to build a team In today's nba. Wings and forwards are without a doubt the most important position. And the kings haven't had good ones in forever.

Instead we continue to focus on guards and centers. It's a continued recipe for disaster.

Between age, body size, skill set, position.. Kuminga has a chance to become an elite star. Mitchell may become a good starter.

And we all knew that kuminga was very raw coming out. The fact he is doing what he is doing is kinda crazy. Mitchell was a college champion who is 23 and supposed to be polished out the games.

In a sense it's like a Malcolm brogdon vs jaylen brown. Yes brogdon won rookie of the year, but flash forward 6 years and brogdon is basically the same player at 29 years old, and jaylen brown is 25 a star and hasn't even entered his prime.

So again, not even a knock on mitchell. Could become a good player. He won't change a franchise like scottie Barnes or kuminga can.

Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app


That's fair. Spot on about positions. It's why I have said before the Kings drafting strategy should change to mirror Toronto's. Long, speed and players that put in effort.
Does anyone believe we would develop a raw player though?


Exactly, Toronto is a fantastic example. OG, Barnes, Siakam are all guys you would love on your team.

As to developing a raw player. I mean, that is the trap we keep falling into for how many years? We keep going in the same cycle because Vivek thinks we are 1 player away, so instead of developing a guy we just draft someone who is "nba ready".

Thomas Robinson "Excellent college rebounder should translate immediately"
Jimmer Ferdette LOL
Stauskas was a 21 year old sharp shooter. I remember they would show us highlights of him hitting 50 straight 3s in his backyard lol.
WCS was the 22 year old ready to go center, instead of the more raw 19 year old Turner
Even Marvin Bagley and his Nbadraft.net profile, the first thing it reads is - "NBA-ready body"

The only guys we took a risk on were De'aaron Fox, who was considered far more raw and unready than Dennis Smith Jr. I remember Vlade being called dumb for taking him over DSJ. And Haliburton who quickly fell down the draft board for questions about his position and handling, but that one was kinda a no brainer.

Id rather stop drafting guys who are "NBA Ready" and are who we thought they were, and instead take a few big risks and hope they pan out.
sacking123
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,464
And1: 1,348
Joined: Jul 23, 2004
Location: Office
Contact:
 

Re: Game 54 Thread - Kings (19-34) @ Warriors (39-13) 

Post#26 » by sacking123 » Fri Feb 4, 2022 9:21 pm

RipPizzaGuy wrote:
simonbampfield wrote:
RipPizzaGuy wrote:It's not even about Davion necessarily. It's just how you need to build a team In today's nba. Wings and forwards are without a doubt the most important position. And the kings haven't had good ones in forever.

Instead we continue to focus on guards and centers. It's a continued recipe for disaster.

Between age, body size, skill set, position.. Kuminga has a chance to become an elite star. Mitchell may become a good starter.

And we all knew that kuminga was very raw coming out. The fact he is doing what he is doing is kinda crazy. Mitchell was a college champion who is 23 and supposed to be polished out the games.

In a sense it's like a Malcolm brogdon vs jaylen brown. Yes brogdon won rookie of the year, but flash forward 6 years and brogdon is basically the same player at 29 years old, and jaylen brown is 25 a star and hasn't even entered his prime.

So again, not even a knock on mitchell. Could become a good player. He won't change a franchise like scottie Barnes or kuminga can.

Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app


That's fair. Spot on about positions. It's why I have said before the Kings drafting strategy should change to mirror Toronto's. Long, speed and players that put in effort.
Does anyone believe we would develop a raw player though?


Exactly, Toronto is a fantastic example. OG, Barnes, Siakam are all guys you would love on your team.

As to developing a raw player. I mean, that is the trap we keep falling into for how many years? We keep going in the same cycle because Vivek thinks we are 1 player away, so instead of developing a guy we just draft someone who is "nba ready".

Thomas Robinson "Excellent college rebounder should translate immediately"
Jimmer Ferdette LOL
Stauskas was a 21 year old sharp shooter. I remember they would show us highlights of him hitting 50 straight 3s in his backyard lol.
WCS was the 22 year old ready to go center, instead of the more raw 19 year old Turner
Even Marvin Bagley and his Nbadraft.net profile, the first thing it reads is - "NBA-ready body"

The only guys we took a risk on were De'aaron Fox, who was considered far more raw and unready than Dennis Smith Jr. I remember Vlade being called dumb for taking him over DSJ. And Haliburton who quickly fell down the draft board for questions about his position and handling, but that one was kinda a no brainer.

Id rather stop drafting guys who are "NBA Ready" and are who we thought they were, and instead take a few big risks and hope they pan out.


One of the things on Andrew Bogut's latest podcast was mike procopio talking about development and they have to start spending on good development coaches. He was with Dallas and recently Rick Carlisle gave him props for his development of Rick Brunson and DFS. procopio & Carlisle hate each other by the way.
They actually had a Sacramento portion of the pod. As you would imagine, it wasn't flattering what was said.

As an aside, they mentioned they've heard Vivek is still too hands on. They actually say someone needs to buy a hannibal lecter jacket for him and let people do their jobs.
I would say their info comes from Barnes as they both know him. They say, Barnes was bought in to help with the young players, but they don't listen.
Sacramento Kings
Sydney Kings
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,366
And1: 3,058
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: Game 54 Thread - Kings (19-34) @ Warriors (39-13) 

Post#27 » by BoogieTime » Fri Feb 4, 2022 10:08 pm

I didn't know some folks really thought highly of Kuminga. I dont think highly. If the question was Giddy or Barnes etc than I wouldve understood where certain folks were coming from. Though as a fan, I think Davion still has the potential to be the better two way player

I also dont rate wings with guards

Return to Sacramento Kings