King Baller wrote:Brad, Ron, Moore, Salmons, SAR and KT all know time is running out and should come in well conditioned.
Ron and John are still in the middle of their prime years, though.
King Baller wrote:Brad, Ron, Moore, Salmons, SAR and KT all know time is running out and should come in well conditioned.
Ballings7 wrote:Really well said, KIE and mitch...King Baller wrote:Brad, Ron, Moore, Salmons, SAR and KT all know time is running out and should come in well conditioned.
Ron and John are still in the middle of their prime years, though.
Ballings7 wrote:Kleiza would of continued the log-jam to a lesser, but still significant extent.
Kleiza + Najera wasn't worth Ron Artest, anyway. Very far from it. You pass on that, pass on it again (like it seemingly came up a 2nd time), and wait for other offers that'll be there in the coming several months. Geoff did the right thing, because in the case of getting something for Ron, better can be had than that. Plus Ron wouldn't of made Denver a title contender, that team needs more than just help on the wing.
KingInExile wrote:VeeJay24 wrote:KingInExile wrote:Sure, let's sit Artest and Miller and give all of their minutes to young guys. What do you think that does to their trade value? They have maximum trade value when they are on the floor producing at their highest possible level every night. Sure we could sit them and take whatever scraps other teams are willing to give (and believe me, scraps are all that will be offered if there is any hint that the Kings are just looking to dump "useless" players). Or we can play them, showcase their abilities and shop them for a the best deal that we can get. But I guess none of that would occur to you since it doesn't fit into the mode of "fire-sale the old guys so we can watch teh yung doods".
And as for the Justin Williams talk, get over it. He had plenty of chances to show what he could do for the team over the parts of the 2 years he was on the roster and he didn't capitalize on those chances. He was not going to fit in with this team because he was 1-dimensional; he did not have the ability to consistently contribute on both ends of the floor.
I hear what you're saying KIE and you're right if they're here they need to play but that's just it they don't need to be here. I understand Petrie was trying to rebuild and stay competitive that was a reality 2 years ago, it's no longer possible. You have teams like Utah & NO who have rebuilt themselves and are standing on the cusp of contending. Even the Lakers to a certain extent have rebuilt themselves and gone to a finals. Portland has rebuilt itself and now just have to make it happen on the court. Seattle is just about half way there, if not half way certainly ahead of the KIngs. We are wasting valuable time not being sure what we want to be at this point. We don't have to hide what other teams already know. They know the Kings have no use for Artest, Miller or Salmons so there is nothing to hide.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that they need to be here (or that they even will be in November). Petrie's first priority this summer is to move Artest; second priority is Miller. I think there's a high likelihood that Artest will be gone this summer to a contending team willing to give up skilled, young prospects and draft picks (hopefully they will take KT as well). Miller will be the harder one to move, though, because he still has a sizable contract and he ended the season with some minor injury concerns...he may be here until the deadline. As I said, I'm not advocating keeping them around. I just want the best deal possible for them in a trade and you won't get a good deal for them by sitting them on the bench (if they happen to still be here when the season starts).The time is now.......Petrie has to stop looking for the perfect deal, tell the teams what you need in return and take the best offer. If he hasn't called the Clippers then something is wrong of course none of us know if he has or not. My point is move Artest & Miller already, set a date that you want to be finish and leave no doubt and put this team on a true rebuilding course.
Let's stop the smoke & mirrors this is not a playoff team.
The trouble with setting a deadline date to move these guys and deciding to compromise on deals just for the sake of moving them is that the team could end up in a worse long-term position than they are in with them on the roster. I would rather hold onto Artest for the season and let him expire and walk next summer than take back a redundant role player with a long-term contract. After this next season Miller turns into a $12M expiring deal; that could be an attractive piece in a deal next summer. Like you said, none of us really know what he's discussed and what he really wants back for Miller and Artest. I just think it's a mistake, though, to not keep options open and enter into the summer with the mindset of "we just need to move these guys".
Smills91 wrote:A trade that I'd like to see happen is this:
Kings deal:
Ron Artest
Hornets deal:
Mike James
Julian Wright
I actually like Wright better than Thornton personally especially for our team needs and dynamics. Also I like James MUCH better than Tim Thomas as a player. Especially when you factor in needs as well. I also think Ron makes more sense for New Orleans as they could use a perimeter stopper AND a BEAST post presence in their offense.
Kings current roster:
C: Brad Miller, Spencer Hawes, Shelden Williams
PF: Mikki Moore, Jason Thompson, SAR, Kenny Thomas
SF: John Salmons, Julian Wright
SG: Kevin Martin, Francisco Garcia, Quincy Douby
PG: Beno Udrih, Mike James, Sean Singletary
Roster in 2 seasons:
C: Spencer Hawes, Shelden Williams
PF: Jason Thompson, Julian Wright
SF: John Salmons, Francisco Garcia
SG: Kevin Martin, Quincy Douby
PG: Beno, Sean Singletary
Add 2 1st round draft picks
That's a pretty good core 12 right there moving forward.

SacKingZZZ wrote:You all do realize that Ron could have left for nothing just a few days ago right? Not only that buy he basically came out and said he wished he would have. That's the risk. Take the best offer or let him go for nothing. Petrie played the field for a year and Ron is still here, good for him. Now he has to do something, there are no fall back plans. Just to free up the youth on this team in my opinion is more valuable to this franchise than any player we would get back in a trade for Artest.
VeeJay24 wrote:
I wasn't saying a deadline to trade guys, that's almost impossible I was saying going to full rebuild mode and setting a more of a timeline to get the rebuilding done. My main problem and the way I see things is Petrie is sort of indecisive in how he wants to go about this rebuilding. Now, I don't know if it's him or the Maloofs but I don't think rebuilding while be competitive is going to work. Sure, if you were retooling a playoff team by lining up the contracts to give you space under the cap by a certain year that's ok but this is not a playoff team--Period Besides just because you have capspace doesn't mean you'll get that FA. The Kings are really working at a disadvantage in that department now.
There is nothing worse than a team that is just good enough to miss the playoffs every year. There is no worse position to be in. Many of you are speaking like Udrih, Artest, & Miller can get this team to the playoffs, that's just not the case.
mitchweber wrote:SacKingZZZ wrote:You all do realize that Ron could have left for nothing just a few days ago right? Not only that buy he basically came out and said he wished he would have. That's the risk. Take the best offer or let him go for nothing. Petrie played the field for a year and Ron is still here, good for him. Now he has to do something, there are no fall back plans. Just to free up the youth on this team in my opinion is more valuable to this franchise than any player we would get back in a trade for Artest.
That was the same situation at the deadline and nobody had a problem then. In fact most thought Ron would opt out.
And the thing is, if the best offer is expirings and some young player that Geoff doesn't like for our team, we're better off letting Ron expire--otherwise it's just a rookie contract taking up space on our books that doesn't fit into our long term plans.

SacKingZZZ wrote:mitchweber wrote:SacKingZZZ wrote:You all do realize that Ron could have left for nothing just a few days ago right? Not only that buy he basically came out and said he wished he would have. That's the risk. Take the best offer or let him go for nothing. Petrie played the field for a year and Ron is still here, good for him. Now he has to do something, there are no fall back plans. Just to free up the youth on this team in my opinion is more valuable to this franchise than any player we would get back in a trade for Artest.
That was the same situation at the deadline and nobody had a problem then. In fact most thought Ron would opt out.
And the thing is, if the best offer is expirings and some young player that Geoff doesn't like for our team, we're better off letting Ron expire--otherwise it's just a rookie contract taking up space on our books that doesn't fit into our long term plans.
Really? Well, the fact remains that there is a zero % chance now, it wasn't for certain before. If we had intentions to just let him walk and thought he was going to, well, why repeat the same pointless delay any longer? Hey, what the heck, why don't we just cut him then??? He doesn't fit into our long term plans either.
