City of Trees wrote:So much in these tweets. Kings have secret workouts. Ford being right. Kings must like John Collins. Wow.
Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
Solid player. Not a huge fan. He could be a better Jason Thompson I guess.
City of Trees wrote:So much in these tweets. Kings have secret workouts. Ford being right. Kings must like John Collins. Wow.
Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
City of Trees wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:I'm really thinking of a 3 for 5/10 based on Jackson going to LA. If he's at 3, and the guy you want, the pick has more value -
Rozier, Crowder, 3 for 5, 10, BOS/SAC swap rights in 2018?
Yeah man 2018 swap has to be off the table...especially with Vlade getting owned on a swap in this draft. IMO swaps two years in a row from two different trades would be the end of his tenure as Kings GM.
Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
Andrew McCeltic wrote:Collins seems like a sweeper. Btw, guy at The Ringer (Bill Simmons' new site) also suggested 3/Crowder for 5/10, but without the 2018 pick swap. I could see 3/Rozier for 5/10, or even 3 for 5/10. But all contingent on draft order, and how much teams covet particular players.

Andrew McCeltic wrote:The Ringer (Bill Simmons' new site) also suggested 3/Crowder for 5/10, but without the 2018 pick swap.
City of Trees wrote:zar wrote:Not liking at all the Butler for #3 headline
Wouldn't Bulls take Jackson?

City of Trees wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:The Ringer (Bill Simmons' new site) also suggested 3/Crowder for 5/10, but without the 2018 pick swap.
Kings trade:
5
10
34
Richardson
Kings Receive:
3 (Fox)
7 (Isaac)
Turner
Boston trades:
3
Crowder
Boston Receives:
5
10
Portland Trades:
15
Turner
Portland Receives:
Afflalo-NG
Wolves trade:
7
Wolves Receive:
15
Crowder
Richardson
34
City of Trees wrote:zar wrote:Not liking at all the Butler for #3 headline
Wouldn't Bulls take Jackson?
Seems like a risky move for Chicago unless they know Butler has one foot out the door.
Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app

codydaze wrote:City of Trees wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:The Ringer (Bill Simmons' new site) also suggested 3/Crowder for 5/10, but without the 2018 pick swap.
Kings trade:
5
10
34
Richardson
Kings Receive:
3 (Fox)
7 (Isaac)
Turner
Boston trades:
3
Crowder
Boston Receives:
5
10
Portland Trades:
15
Turner
Portland Receives:
Afflalo-NG
Wolves trade:
7
Wolves Receive:
15
Crowder
Richardson
34
I would be happy with this but I'd probably go SF at 3 because I don't Isaac falls to 7 but it's possible Fox could slide to 7 if this is how the picks ended up. I'd want Tatum at 3 and Fox/DSJ at 7.
I could see it going like this:
Phi - Fultz
LAL - Ball
Sac - Tatum
Pho - Isaac
Bos - Jackson
Orl - DSJ
Sac - Fox (or vice versa with DSJ)
I still think Isaac is the pick at 4 if we take Fox at 3 but Orlando would probably then take Tatum.

Sactowndog wrote:codydaze wrote:City of Trees wrote:
Kings trade:
5
10
34
Richardson
Kings Receive:
3 (Fox)
7 (Isaac)
Turner
Boston trades:
3
Crowder
Boston Receives:
5
10
Portland Trades:
15
Turner
Portland Receives:
Afflalo-NG
Wolves trade:
7
Wolves Receive:
15
Crowder
Richardson
34
I would be happy with this but I'd probably go SF at 3 because I don't Isaac falls to 7 but it's possible Fox could slide to 7 if this is how the picks ended up. I'd want Tatum at 3 and Fox/DSJ at 7.
I could see it going like this:
Phi - Fultz
LAL - Ball
Sac - Tatum
Pho - Isaac
Bos - Jackson
Orl - DSJ
Sac - Fox (or vice versa with DSJ)
I still think Isaac is the pick at 4 if we take Fox at 3 but Orlando would probably then take Tatum.
I am not sure that Isaac isn't the pick at 3 if Boston doesn't trade it. And I am not convinced they will trade it. They need to get more athletic and Isaac allows them to to do exactly that on the wing with Brown and Isaac.
It isn't beyond the realm of possibility we could be choosing between Fox and Ball at 5.
1) Fultz
2) Jackson
3) Isaac
4) Tatum
5) Fox or Ball.
codydaze wrote:Sactowndog wrote:codydaze wrote:
I would be happy with this but I'd probably go SF at 3 because I don't Isaac falls to 7 but it's possible Fox could slide to 7 if this is how the picks ended up. I'd want Tatum at 3 and Fox/DSJ at 7.
I could see it going like this:
Phi - Fultz
LAL - Ball
Sac - Tatum
Pho - Isaac
Bos - Jackson
Orl - DSJ
Sac - Fox (or vice versa with DSJ)
I still think Isaac is the pick at 4 if we take Fox at 3 but Orlando would probably then take Tatum.
I am not sure that Isaac isn't the pick at 3 if Boston doesn't trade it. And I am not convinced they will trade it. They need to get more athletic and Isaac allows them to to do exactly that on the wing with Brown and Isaac.
It isn't beyond the realm of possibility we could be choosing between Fox and Ball at 5.
1) Fultz
2) Jackson
3) Isaac
4) Tatum
5) Fox or Ball.
I still think if Boston doesn't trade the pick then they take Tatum. They desperately need another go to scorer and that's what Tatum would give them. Brown is their young, defensive minded wing and they have Crowder as well so they need someone that can generate their own buckets and I don't think Isaac is necessarily that guy.
codydaze wrote:Sactowndog wrote:codydaze wrote:
I would be happy with this but I'd probably go SF at 3 because I don't Isaac falls to 7 but it's possible Fox could slide to 7 if this is how the picks ended up. I'd want Tatum at 3 and Fox/DSJ at 7.
I could see it going like this:
Phi - Fultz
LAL - Ball
Sac - Tatum
Pho - Isaac
Bos - Jackson
Orl - DSJ
Sac - Fox (or vice versa with DSJ)
I still think Isaac is the pick at 4 if we take Fox at 3 but Orlando would probably then take Tatum.
I am not sure that Isaac isn't the pick at 3 if Boston doesn't trade it. And I am not convinced they will trade it. They need to get more athletic and Isaac allows them to to do exactly that on the wing with Brown and Isaac.
It isn't beyond the realm of possibility we could be choosing between Fox and Ball at 5.
1) Fultz
2) Jackson
3) Isaac
4) Tatum
5) Fox or Ball.
I still think if Boston doesn't trade the pick then they take Tatum. They desperately need another go to scorer and that's what Tatum would give them. Brown is their young, defensive minded wing and they have Crowder as well so they need someone that can generate their own buckets and I don't think Isaac is necessarily that guy.
Sactowndog wrote:codydaze wrote:Sactowndog wrote:
I am not sure that Isaac isn't the pick at 3 if Boston doesn't trade it. And I am not convinced they will trade it. They need to get more athletic and Isaac allows them to to do exactly that on the wing with Brown and Isaac.
It isn't beyond the realm of possibility we could be choosing between Fox and Ball at 5.
1) Fultz
2) Jackson
3) Isaac
4) Tatum
5) Fox or Ball.
I still think if Boston doesn't trade the pick then they take Tatum. They desperately need another go to scorer and that's what Tatum would give them. Brown is their young, defensive minded wing and they have Crowder as well so they need someone that can generate their own buckets and I don't think Isaac is necessarily that guy.
Crowder is absolutely already a defensive minded wing. But if you watch their games they need an athletic big who can rebound as badly as they need a someone that can generate their own buckets. I also would not agree Brown is defensive minded. He needs to grow his game and he will. I am assuming they can get GH to sign as a free agent. If so they will have IT, Haywood and Horton as go to scorers. What they don't have is anyone to rebound the ball and can spot up on the three.
VeganKingsFan wrote:Sactowndog wrote:codydaze wrote:
I still think if Boston doesn't trade the pick then they take Tatum. They desperately need another go to scorer and that's what Tatum would give them. Brown is their young, defensive minded wing and they have Crowder as well so they need someone that can generate their own buckets and I don't think Isaac is necessarily that guy.
Crowder is absolutely already a defensive minded wing. But if you watch their games they need an athletic big who can rebound as badly as they need a someone that can generate their own buckets. I also would not agree Brown is defensive minded. He needs to grow his game and he will. I am assuming they can get GH to sign as a free agent. If so they will have IT, Haywood and Horton as go to scorers. What they don't have is anyone to rebound the ball and can spot up on the three.
Who are Haywood and Horton?
Sactowndog wrote:codydaze wrote:Sactowndog wrote:
I am not sure that Isaac isn't the pick at 3 if Boston doesn't trade it. And I am not convinced they will trade it. They need to get more athletic and Isaac allows them to to do exactly that on the wing with Brown and Isaac.
It isn't beyond the realm of possibility we could be choosing between Fox and Ball at 5.
1) Fultz
2) Jackson
3) Isaac
4) Tatum
5) Fox or Ball.
I still think if Boston doesn't trade the pick then they take Tatum. They desperately need another go to scorer and that's what Tatum would give them. Brown is their young, defensive minded wing and they have Crowder as well so they need someone that can generate their own buckets and I don't think Isaac is necessarily that guy.
Crowder is absolutely already a defensive minded wing. But if you watch their games they need an athletic big who can rebound as badly as they need a someone that can generate their own buckets. I also would not agree Brown is defensive minded. He needs to grow his game and he will. I am assuming they can get GH to sign as a free agent. If so they will have IT, Haywood and Horton as go to scorers. What they don't have is anyone to rebound the ball and can spot up on the three.
VeganKingsFan wrote:Sactowndog wrote:codydaze wrote:
I still think if Boston doesn't trade the pick then they take Tatum. They desperately need another go to scorer and that's what Tatum would give them. Brown is their young, defensive minded wing and they have Crowder as well so they need someone that can generate their own buckets and I don't think Isaac is necessarily that guy.
Crowder is absolutely already a defensive minded wing. But if you watch their games they need an athletic big who can rebound as badly as they need a someone that can generate their own buckets. I also would not agree Brown is defensive minded. He needs to grow his game and he will. I am assuming they can get GH to sign as a free agent. If so they will have IT, Haywood and Horton as go to scorers. What they don't have is anyone to rebound the ball and can spot up on the three.
Who are Haywood and Horton?
sdballer wrote:VeganKingsFan wrote:Sactowndog wrote:
Crowder is absolutely already a defensive minded wing. But if you watch their games they need an athletic big who can rebound as badly as they need a someone that can generate their own buckets. I also would not agree Brown is defensive minded. He needs to grow his game and he will. I am assuming they can get GH to sign as a free agent. If so they will have IT, Haywood and Horton as go to scorers. What they don't have is anyone to rebound the ball and can spot up on the three.
Who are Haywood and Horton?
Canadian singer/songwriter duo from the 70's. Think Simon and garfunkle but more "beardy"
SacKingZZZ wrote:City of Trees wrote:So much in these tweets. Kings have secret workouts. Ford being right. Kings must like John Collins. Wow.
Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
Solid player. Not a huge fan. He could be a better Jason Thompson I guess.
Smills91 wrote:You guys are idiots....
If you sleep on Beno, he can drop 30/10 on you.

theo42 wrote:If you think Philly isn't getting better you will be shocked with how they play this year.