SacKingZZZ wrote:City of Trees wrote:Exactly Anderson is more glue guy yhan star.simonbampfield wrote:That’s the thing, Anderson’s stats suggest he was an elite defender last season, right the top in terms of SFs.
While he can play some small ball 4 he is by no means a PF. His shooting is a concern and SA didn’t even play him much against GS in the playoffs because of this until the last two games he shot very well in limited minutes. He isn’t aggressive though which he needs to be, however he’s such a good defender that he would compliment the roster now and moving forward without destroying the cap. Not our star that’s for sure, but a huge piece IMO to continue the growth towards POs.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my LG-H872 using RealGM mobile app
But he could be much more if a team gave him the ball. Remember, this is a player that was a legit play maker in college. If a team gambles on him I think he can have that Diaw type of game people expected. I just don't know if the Kings would use him that way either but he could take away some of the sting of not drafting Doncic. I agree that he is more 4 than 3.
Boris Diaw is an interesting comparison. I'm glad you brought him up. By year 2 Boris had an assist% of 20%, by year 3 he was at 25%. Kyle Anderson in 4 years on a good ball movement team has yet to crack 15%.
Boris also averaged 6.5 assists in his 3rd year with a usage of 18%. Kyle only averaged 3 with a 14% usage rate. The per 36 still has Boris 3 higher than Anderson. Boris was also much better equipped to defend 4's and 5's. Anderson is too skinny for 4's and to slow for 3's. I also think getting another 4 should be the last thing on our mind. We need a true 3. Not a 4 who can play some 3.












