ImageImageImageImageImage

2023-24 General Thread

Moderators: codydaze, KF10

BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,402
And1: 3,065
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#661 » by BoogieTime » Sat Jun 22, 2024 10:45 pm

I think its Kuzma too... just the haggling left.. I feel like we are trying to play chicken with the wizards to get that 26th pick as well for the 13th
OxAndFox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,551
And1: 3,100
Joined: May 17, 2022
Contact:

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#662 » by OxAndFox » Sat Jun 22, 2024 11:18 pm

You do get the sense that its now just a waiting game for the draft for Kuzma to be here.
FarBeyondDriven
Analyst
Posts: 3,354
And1: 2,594
Joined: Aug 11, 2021

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#663 » by FarBeyondDriven » Sun Jun 23, 2024 12:53 am

BoogieTime wrote:I think its Kuzma too... just the haggling left.. I feel like we are trying to play chicken with the wizards to get that 26th pick as well for the 13th


the #13 pick for a slight improvement over Barnes doesn't seem worth it.
typedrat
Sophomore
Posts: 107
And1: 62
Joined: Jan 22, 2024
       

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#664 » by typedrat » Sun Jun 23, 2024 1:31 am

There are going to be (quite possibly more than) slight improvements over current HB available in the draft at HB, and they're on rookie-scale deals.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,402
And1: 3,065
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#665 » by BoogieTime » Sun Jun 23, 2024 5:44 pm

FarBeyondDriven wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:I think its Kuzma too... just the haggling left.. I feel like we are trying to play chicken with the wizards to get that 26th pick as well for the 13th


the #13 pick for a slight improvement over Barnes doesn't seem worth it.


Slight improvement? Barnes really wasn’t playing at a high level at all last year, and desperately needs to be replaced in the starting unit. Kuzma has the talent to ‘possibly’ be a strong starting fit, that’s why they have been targeting him for years - they seemingly like some advanced stats or whatever that could fit with Sabonis

Whether or not the Kings could do something else with 13 is another matter. We’ve been through this, and I respect and I know others think there are better prospects than Kuzma with better contracts, but IMO where the Kings are as a team needs the non guesswork of a vet. All the rumors seem to point to the FO agreeing and seeking out trades. I will be surprised if we draft, but we will see
typedrat
Sophomore
Posts: 107
And1: 62
Joined: Jan 22, 2024
       

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#666 » by typedrat » Sun Jun 23, 2024 8:22 pm

Across the three seasons he's been with the Wizards:

  • When Kuzma is on the floor, the team has an offensive rating of 112.45, a defensive rating of 118.21, and a net rating of -5.76.
  • When Kuzma is off the floor, the team has an offensive rating of 112.65, a defensive rating of 115.72, and a net rating of -3.07.

If you think that's unfair because of how high his usage is with the Wizards, let's look at his time with the Lakers:

  • When Kuzma was on the floor, the team had an offensive rating of 109.49, a defensive rating of 109.42, and a net rating of 0.07.
  • When Kuzma was off the floor, the team had an offensive rating of 110.32, a defensive rating of 107.65, and a net rating of 2.68.

Pretending that a guy is going to suddenly make a defensive jump in year 8 of his NBA career is... optimistic. I question the wisdom of avoiding uncertainty by making a decision you know will be bad.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,402
And1: 3,065
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#667 » by BoogieTime » Sun Jun 23, 2024 9:09 pm

typedrat wrote:Across the three seasons he's been with the Wizards:

  • When Kuzma is on the floor, the team has an offensive rating of 112.45, a defensive rating of 118.21, and a net rating of -5.76.
  • When Kuzma is off the floor, the team has an offensive rating of 112.65, a defensive rating of 115.72, and a net rating of -3.07.

If you think that's unfair because of how high his usage is with the Wizards, let's look at his time with the Lakers:

  • When Kuzma was on the floor, the team had an offensive rating of 109.49, a defensive rating of 109.42, and a net rating of 0.07.
  • When Kuzma was off the floor, the team had an offensive rating of 110.32, a defensive rating of 107.65, and a net rating of 2.68.

Pretending that a guy is going to suddenly make a defensive jump in year 8 of his NBA career is... optimistic. I question the wisdom of avoiding uncertainty by making a decision you know will be bad.


Those are largely team influenced stats IMO. The guy starts for the Wizards, a bad team

I don’t know about last year, but when the Kings were pursuing him as an FA in the 2023 offseason I remember him having some surprising rim protection numbers in the 2023 season
typedrat
Sophomore
Posts: 107
And1: 62
Joined: Jan 22, 2024
       

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#668 » by typedrat » Sun Jun 23, 2024 9:39 pm

BoogieTime wrote:Those are largely team influenced stats IMO. The guy starts for the Wizards, a bad team

I don’t know about last year, but when the Kings were pursuing him as an FA in the 2023 offseason I remember him having some surprising rim protection numbers in the 2023 season


If that was true, then why did he have very similar effects on the net rating of the Lakers, a team he won a championship with?
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,402
And1: 3,065
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#669 » by BoogieTime » Sun Jun 23, 2024 9:54 pm

typedrat wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:Those are largely team influenced stats IMO. The guy starts for the Wizards, a bad team

I don’t know about last year, but when the Kings were pursuing him as an FA in the 2023 offseason I remember him having some surprising rim protection numbers in the 2023 season


If that was true, then why did he have very similar effects on the net rating of the Lakers, a team he won a championship with?


Why are you grouping how he fared with the Lakers in one stat? What were his stats when the Lakers were good as opposed to when the Lakers were bad? I'm willing to be those numbers were a lot more positive when LeBron and AD were around because IMO they are largely team driven
typedrat
Sophomore
Posts: 107
And1: 62
Joined: Jan 22, 2024
       

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#670 » by typedrat » Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:26 pm

I was trying to make a simple point simply, but let's look at a season by season comparison of Barnes and Kuzma using an advanced metric, DARKO, which attempts to control for teammates and other external variables.

Image

At his very best moment, during his championship-winning season with the Lakers, he was about as positively impactful of a basketball player as Harrison Barnes is right now.
Lost in LA
Pro Prospect
Posts: 873
And1: 188
Joined: Jul 09, 2016
       

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#671 » by Lost in LA » Mon Jun 24, 2024 3:21 pm

typedrat wrote:I was trying to make a simple point simply, but let's look at a season by season comparison of Barnes and Kuzma using an advanced metric, DARKO, which attempts to control for teammates and other external variables.

Image

At his very best moment, during his championship-winning season with the Lakers, he was about as positively impactful of a basketball player as Harrison Barnes is right now.


He was a fourth or fifth option for the Lakers when he was there. Barnes is unquestionably on the downside of his career and does not appear to be involved much of the time. I believe we need 7,8,9 type rotational players for the regular season, and a forward who can defend for the starting group. Fox looked pretty worn out toward the end of last season, and badly needs some help.
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,973
And1: 12,092
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#672 » by LightTheBeam » Mon Jun 24, 2024 7:00 pm

Curious what Sac does here.

I'm still on board with going the cheaper route and chasing someone like John Collins instead of giving up our pick.

We traded last years pick to dump Holmes
We hopefully won't have next years either

Might be important to use this years pick to add some cheap/upside talent while we still can.

Barnes/Huerter for Collins
Dump Sasha somewhere
(these 2 moves save us 15 million)
Use the MLE on Jalen Smith
Draft one of the forwards

Fox - Keon - Keegan - Collins - Sabonis
Mitchell/Colby - Monk - #13 - Lyles - Smith

That's an interesting rotation going into next year. Add some size with capable shooting in the front court, and another forward we can develop.
OxAndFox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,551
And1: 3,100
Joined: May 17, 2022
Contact:

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#673 » by OxAndFox » Mon Jun 24, 2024 8:08 pm

Smith would be a nice target. I do like that thinking and while it might not be popular a little bit of forward thinking regarding the cap would be good.
Jkam31
Head Coach
Posts: 6,876
And1: 5,835
Joined: Feb 23, 2014

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#674 » by Jkam31 » Mon Jun 24, 2024 8:58 pm

LightTheBeam wrote:Curious what Sac does here.

I'm still on board with going the cheaper route and chasing someone like John Collins instead of giving up our pick.

We traded last years pick to dump Holmes
We hopefully won't have next years either

Might be important to use this years pick to add some cheap/upside talent while we still can.

Barnes/Huerter for Collins
Dump Sasha somewhere
(these 2 moves save us 15 million)
Use the MLE on Jalen Smith
Draft one of the forwards

Fox - Keon - Keegan - Collins - Sabonis
Mitchell/Colby - Monk - #13 - Lyles - Smith

That's an interesting rotation going into next year. Add some size with capable shooting in the front court, and another forward we can develop.


Collins doesn’t raise our ceiling I think kuzma/Grant could raise our ceiling
FarBeyondDriven
Analyst
Posts: 3,354
And1: 2,594
Joined: Aug 11, 2021

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#675 » by FarBeyondDriven » Mon Jun 24, 2024 9:21 pm

BoogieTime wrote:
FarBeyondDriven wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:I think its Kuzma too... just the haggling left.. I feel like we are trying to play chicken with the wizards to get that 26th pick as well for the 13th


the #13 pick for a slight improvement over Barnes doesn't seem worth it.


Slight improvement? Barnes really wasn’t playing at a high level at all last year, and desperately needs to be replaced in the starting unit. Kuzma has the talent to ‘possibly’ be a strong starting fit, that’s why they have been targeting him for years - they seemingly like some advanced stats or whatever that could fit with Sabonis

Whether or not the Kings could do something else with 13 is another matter. We’ve been through this, and I respect and I know others think there are better prospects than Kuzma with better contracts, but IMO where the Kings are as a team needs the non guesswork of a vet. All the rumors seem to point to the FO agreeing and seeking out trades. I will be surprised if we draft, but we will see


Kuzma dominates the ball on a bad Wizards team so his production with us would be much less as the 4th and sometimes even 5th option. Then you'd probably see his numbers similar to HB from two seasons ago. Not really a huge improvement when you consider the efficiency drop at the end of the day. In a vacuum would I want Kuzma over Barnes? Sure. But not if it costs us the #13 pick. I'd rather use that pick on a PF like Smith or trade back and use a later pick on Holmes II while picking up more draft picks, have control over those guys on the cheap for years and develop them behind Barnes than trade it for Kuzma.

I just don't think a slightly higher ceiling short-term is worth costing us a potential much higher ceiling long-term. If I liked Kuzma and didn't view him as a knucklehead and hard to root for I'd be more receptive but I don't.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,402
And1: 3,065
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#676 » by BoogieTime » Mon Jun 24, 2024 9:23 pm

https://kingsherald.com/articles/report-kings-shopping-the-13th-pick-were-close-on-caruso/

Kings almost traded the 13th for Caruso..

Apparently its the Kings who need to be incentivized to get Lavine.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,402
And1: 3,065
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#677 » by BoogieTime » Mon Jun 24, 2024 9:27 pm

FarBeyondDriven wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:
FarBeyondDriven wrote:
the #13 pick for a slight improvement over Barnes doesn't seem worth it.


Slight improvement? Barnes really wasn’t playing at a high level at all last year, and desperately needs to be replaced in the starting unit. Kuzma has the talent to ‘possibly’ be a strong starting fit, that’s why they have been targeting him for years - they seemingly like some advanced stats or whatever that could fit with Sabonis

Whether or not the Kings could do something else with 13 is another matter. We’ve been through this, and I respect and I know others think there are better prospects than Kuzma with better contracts, but IMO where the Kings are as a team needs the non guesswork of a vet. All the rumors seem to point to the FO agreeing and seeking out trades. I will be surprised if we draft, but we will see


Kuzma dominates the ball on a bad Wizards team so his production with us would be much less as the 4th and sometimes even 5th option. Then you'd probably see his numbers similar to HB from two seasons ago. Not really a huge improvement when you consider the efficiency drop at the end of the day. In a vacuum would I want Kuzma over Barnes? Sure. But not if it costs us the #13 pick. I'd rather use that pick on a PF like Smith or trade back and use a later pick on Holmes II while picking up more draft picks, have control over those guys on the cheap for years and develop them behind Barnes than trade it for Kuzma.

I just don't think a slightly higher ceiling short-term is worth costing us a potential much higher ceiling long-term. If I liked Kuzma and didn't view him as a knucklehead and hard to root for I'd be more receptive but I don't.


From all reports we are desperately trying to move the 13 for help now, will be surprised if its drafted. Whether or not thats Kuzma, I don't know

We can go over Kuzma's stats, but the Kings are after him, according to reports for years. They have some reason to believe his game will be accentuated here and accentuate others here.
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,973
And1: 12,092
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#678 » by LightTheBeam » Mon Jun 24, 2024 9:44 pm

Jkam31 wrote:
LightTheBeam wrote:Curious what Sac does here.

I'm still on board with going the cheaper route and chasing someone like John Collins instead of giving up our pick.

We traded last years pick to dump Holmes
We hopefully won't have next years either

Might be important to use this years pick to add some cheap/upside talent while we still can.

Barnes/Huerter for Collins
Dump Sasha somewhere
(these 2 moves save us 15 million)
Use the MLE on Jalen Smith
Draft one of the forwards

Fox - Keon - Keegan - Collins - Sabonis
Mitchell/Colby - Monk - #13 - Lyles - Smith

That's an interesting rotation going into next year. Add some size with capable shooting in the front court, and another forward we can develop.


Collins doesn’t raise our ceiling I think kuzma/Grant could raise our ceiling


Judging based on fit/cost/salary, I'm all the way out on Grant.

Kuzma Ive come around on, but I'm not sure what more he brings that Collins can't. People forgetting Collins was a 20/10 guy (16/8 for his career) who could hit a 3. He's mobile, athletic, can rebound, can get his own bucket, and would be a good threat off the bounce with Sabonis/Monk. He's also 2 years younger than Kuzma.

To me its
Kuzma vs Collins + 13. I'd rather take the risk that Collins revives his career with us and we hit on 13.
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,973
And1: 12,092
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#679 » by LightTheBeam » Mon Jun 24, 2024 10:27 pm

If the Bulls pivoting from #13 to Giddey is true, I don't really understand it.

I know Caruso is a fantastic defense, but I'm just not seeing that as a huge need. I'm guessing the salary matching would have been 2 of Mitchell/Sasha/Duarte.

It would have commit Sac to being very small, and with no real assets to upgrade the forward spot.

Fox - Keon - Murray - Barnes - Sabonis
Monk - Caruso - Huerter - Lyles

That's a lot of 2guards in the rotation. Sure maybe they had something lined up to send Huerter for a forward, but i'm kinda glad that Chicago pivoted if this is true.
OxAndFox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,551
And1: 3,100
Joined: May 17, 2022
Contact:

Re: 2023-24 General Thread 

Post#680 » by OxAndFox » Tue Jun 25, 2024 12:18 am

It doesn't mean the whole trade was #13 for Caruso.
Could have been Caruso/Lavine for Barnes/Huerter/Sasha/Duarte/#13.

Return to Sacramento Kings