ImageImageImageImageImage

Brendan Haywood

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

sackings916
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,176
And1: 829
Joined: Sep 07, 2002

Brendan Haywood 

Post#1 » by sackings916 » Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:39 pm

What are your thoughts on acquiring Brendan Haywood this offseason? Would you be OK with Haywood being the FA we get with our cap space? The Kings would most likely have to be willing to pay around $10M per for the next 4 or 5 years. I think its overpaying, but realsitically IMO thats what the Kings will have to do anyway. Haywood is exactly what this team needs, he's a good post defender, blocks shots, rebounds. He's a defensive presence next to Landry, it moves both Hawes and Thompson to the bench where they should be IMO and hopefully they are able to work on and improve their games and bodies this offseason. If we could sign Haywood to something like 5/$50 and get Turner in the draft, we wouldn't be too far off from contending IMO.

Haywood/Hawes/Brockman
Landry/Thompson/Greene/Nocioni
Casspi/Greene/Garcia/Nocioni
Turner/Garcia
Evans/Udrih
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#2 » by SacKingZZZ » Sat May 1, 2010 2:15 am

Depends on who we draft but I'd like him. For 10 million a year? Hell nah! :P Just too much $$$ for a role player. If it was like literally the last piece we needed to get over the top then maybe but it's not. Might be better off trying to find us a young "Haywood" or trading for an existing contracted talent with less years.
cuad
Banned User
Posts: 5,371
And1: 2
Joined: May 26, 2009

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#3 » by cuad » Sat May 1, 2010 6:51 am

He destroyed us in the ESPN Washington game. I saw him trying to defend the pick and roll in the playoffs and he was horrible at it. However in the paint, you can put him on other centers and trust that he'll be ok defending one on one.

But yeah, he's going to want a lot of cash. Maybe though, the horrible playoff series and all the minutes that Carlisle refused to give him would force him to have a lower asking price.
User avatar
_SRV_
Analyst
Posts: 3,030
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Location: brew for breakfast

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#4 » by _SRV_ » Sat May 1, 2010 3:31 pm

If we draft Favors, he should be the primary target, else it's debatable, we'll need more scoring upfront.
xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:Kobe gets bailed out more than Wall Street.
BriGuy
Ballboy
Posts: 16
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 19, 2010

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#5 » by BriGuy » Sat May 1, 2010 4:26 pm

I prefer Cousins .. some Risk .. high reward .. combination of Tyreke and Cousins is just very
Shaq & Penny to me .. throwing Haywood in that mix I could like .. but not at the price of 10 per year .. not if we have Cousins ..

Favors has huge upside .. but mixing JT/Landry/Favors ... unless JT bulks up and is permanent 5 ...I can't see Favors as a benefit at center being 6'9" ...a guy like Cousins commands the paint .. and him creating lanes and or blocking out for Tyreke .. seems to good to pass up ..
cuad
Banned User
Posts: 5,371
And1: 2
Joined: May 26, 2009

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#6 » by cuad » Sat May 1, 2010 7:16 pm

BriGuy wrote:I prefer Cousins .. some Risk .. high reward .. combination of Tyreke and Cousins is just very
Shaq & Penny to me .. throwing Haywood in that mix I could like .. but not at the price of 10 per year .. not if we have Cousins ..

Favors has huge upside .. but mixing JT/Landry/Favors ... unless JT bulks up and is permanent 5 ...I can't see Favors as a benefit at center being 6'9" ...a guy like Cousins commands the paint .. and him creating lanes and or blocking out for Tyreke .. seems to good to pass up ..

I pretty much agree with every point here.
User avatar
RoyalCourtJestr
Analyst
Posts: 3,146
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Location: Tyreke Evans/DeMarcus Cousins. That is all.

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#7 » by RoyalCourtJestr » Sat May 1, 2010 7:27 pm

I'd rather take Cousins for 1/3 of the dough and work on his defense. Haywood would really be a good fit here, but not for 10m
mprose wrote:And that leaves me with the conclusion that DMC is the Sarah Palin of the NBA.
User avatar
Bac2Basics
RealGM
Posts: 13,588
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 03, 2001
Location: "Are you like a crazy person? I'm quite sure they will say so."
   

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#8 » by Bac2Basics » Sun May 2, 2010 7:18 pm

I can see Sacramento bringing in a veteran guy like Haywood even if they draft a big (Cousins, etc.) however, I can't see them offering anywhere close to $10 million/year.
Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanity over humanity, nothing exceeds most of the criticisms made on the habits of the poor by the well-housed, well-warmed, and well-fed.
~ Herman Melville
smills92
Banned User
Posts: 67
And1: 0
Joined: May 02, 2010

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#9 » by smills92 » Sun May 2, 2010 10:33 pm

he is staying with mavs. lets just sign dirk! :D unless we gave haywood 13 million a year we aint getting haywood.
sackings916
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,176
And1: 829
Joined: Sep 07, 2002

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#10 » by sackings916 » Mon May 3, 2010 2:34 am

A few things I think we should consider is that Haywood is an elite defensive big man in terms of ALL 3 post defense, shotblocking and rebounding. Thats very rare to find. The other is that he is PROVEN. Favors or Cousins might be better players, but Haywood is exactly what this team is missing.

If we sign Haywood and draft one of Favors/Cousins, I could see Thompson or Hawes being moved for a scorer to help Tyreke.
sackings916
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,176
And1: 829
Joined: Sep 07, 2002

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#11 » by sackings916 » Mon May 3, 2010 2:36 am

double post
sackings916
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,176
And1: 829
Joined: Sep 07, 2002

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#12 » by sackings916 » Mon May 3, 2010 2:37 am

A few things I think we should consider is that Haywood is an elite defensive big man in terms of ALL 3 post defense, shotblocking and rebounding. Thats very rare to find. The other is that he is PROVEN. Favors or Cousins might be better players, but they msy never be the post defender Haywood is, the shotblocker or rebounder let alone all 3. Haywood is exactly what this team is missing, I just do not want to overpay.

If we sign Haywood and draft one of Favors/Cousins, I could see Thompson or Hawes being moved for a scorer to help Tyreke.
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,687
And1: 1,363
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#13 » by OGSactownballer » Tue May 4, 2010 11:16 pm

If we end up with Cousins there is noneed to overpay for someone like Haywood. We would be much better off signing a guy for mid-level type money and contract length as a vet b/u prescence. We are just not in a position to need a Haywood type right now. And I am not sure how much he would help after seeing how Dallas did in the first round. I think that people often make the mistake that guys who are defense-only at Center are a must have. In the East, yes, because of the slower pace and half-court dominant style a big thug Center is more necessary. However in the West, the game is much more motion open and free-flowing and you need a mobile Center who can also hit a mid-range jumper.
Photo Guy
Banned User
Posts: 248
And1: 0
Joined: May 02, 2010
Location: Knoxville, TN

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#14 » by Photo Guy » Wed May 5, 2010 2:29 am

Fesenko is a better target at a fraction of the cost.
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,687
And1: 1,363
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#15 » by OGSactownballer » Wed May 5, 2010 4:30 am

Exactly my thought. Why overpay when you do not need to?
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#16 » by SacKingZZZ » Wed May 5, 2010 4:45 am

I like Fesenko but the truth is that while he comes at a fraction of the cost, he also provides a fraction of the production. Still, paying Haywood mega millions while not even close to really knowing what the finished product of this team will look like is a huge mistake.
User avatar
Wolfay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,656
And1: 649
Joined: Aug 13, 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
       

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#17 » by Wolfay » Wed May 5, 2010 5:07 am

Watch Fesenko during the series against the Lakers. You won't be impressed.
Image
User avatar
longfellow44
Head Coach
Posts: 6,031
And1: 241
Joined: May 04, 2007
Location: Washinton DC

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#18 » by longfellow44 » Wed May 5, 2010 3:39 pm

Why pay a 30 year old guy that much for the legnth that he'll want it won't help our team. Draft cousins and looke to move one of hawes or landry for a reserve shot blocking big man.
ICMTM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,347
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
     

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#19 » by ICMTM » Wed May 5, 2010 6:42 pm

N to the izz O W to the IzzAY.
KANGZZZZZ!
chriswebb86
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,839
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Location: Reno / Australia
Contact:

Re: Brendan Haywood 

Post#20 » by chriswebb86 » Wed May 5, 2010 8:32 pm

I like Haywood, but at 10 million a year I am not sure he would be the best player for that kind of money. I wouldnt mind going after Dirk for a 3 or 4 year deal.

Return to Sacramento Kings