Page 1 of 5

Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 8:41 pm
by a-rod
Image

Image
Image

Image

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Image

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Image

Image
watch the language - ICMTM

Image
Image

Image

Image
Combo guard with great scoring skills... Knows how to get to the basket... Great leaping skills... Fine mid-range game.


Image

Image
After an 0-5 start, things are suddenly looking up for the Detroit Pistons. The Sacramento Kings wish they could say the same.Detroit looks for its fourth win in five games since its ugly beginning Sunday at Arco Arena, where the Kings try to avoid a fifth consecutive loss.

Link

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 8:57 pm
by Wolfay
Great thread as usual a-rod.

I'm not getting my hopes up for this game, and quite possibly every game from now on.

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:32 pm
by princeofpalace
Nice Game thread.

But technical Prince is SF and Daye is the PF

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 10:02 pm
by aad
princeofpalace wrote:Nice Game thread.

But technical Prince is SF and Daye is the PF

max will be starting at pf

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 10:18 pm
by ComboGuardCity
This is probably the best game thread I have ever seen.

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:07 pm
by ICMTM
Free Donte Greene

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:12 pm
by RIPskaterdude
Daye will have a career game for the Pistons, Greene won't see a minute of playing time, and Westfail will come and say that "we tried everything against him".

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:15 pm
by pillwenney
Whoa....3pm start for no apparent reason?


Weird...

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:23 pm
by SacKingZZZ
You know, it's sad really. We have the potential to have a very awesome offense built around two very talented pieces in Cousins and Evans, yet, we still look like a team playing around Kenny Thomas and Mike Bibby. Strange.

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:28 pm
by pillwenney
There is absolutely no reason to be Head in instead of Cisco. None.

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:30 pm
by Wolfay
mitchweber wrote:There is absolutely no reason to be Head in instead of Cisco. None.


Now they're both in...

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:36 pm
by pillwenney
Well....I think we're trying harder than we were in other games. Unfortunately, we still suck.

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:37 pm
by SacKingZZZ
I'm pretty sure Westphal posts Dalembert up more than Cousins.

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:37 pm
by KF10
1 assist in the quarter? Really?

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:38 pm
by RIPskaterdude
Landry played the entire 1st quarter...looks like JT is going to see another game on the bench.

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:39 pm
by Wolfay
There's just no rhythm whatsoever. Every offensive play looks like a bunch of amateurs who don't know each out there.

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:42 pm
by SacKingZZZ
Westphal sticking up for Cousins, I like that.

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:43 pm
by RIPskaterdude
Have we held a team under 50% shooting this entire year? I swear...

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:43 pm
by SacKingZZZ
Wolfay wrote:There's just no rhythm whatsoever. Every offensive play looks like a bunch of amateurs who don't know each out there.


Well, at least right now there's a good reason for that. Head, Wright, Thompson, Cisco, and Cousins. Don't know if I've seen that lineup before.

Re: Detroit (3-6) @ Sacramento (3-5)

Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:44 pm
by pillwenney
We're going to Demarcus plenty now that he's not playing with Landry, which makes sense. Demarcus is having some troubles though.