Page 1 of 7
Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:40 am
by Wolfay
I guess a-rod is busy.
Honestly I'm not very optimistic, especially if that gimmick lineup turns out to be true.
Have at it folks.
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:46 am
by KingInExile
According to Jason Jones' pre-game blog...
Paul Westphal is still being coy, only agreeing to speak about the new starting lineup hypothetically during his pregame media time.
That (hypothetical) lineup is:
G Tyreke Evans
G Luther Head
C Samuel Dalembert
F Jason Thompson
F Carl Landry
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:59 am
by KF10
Bleh. I don't like the fact that Thompson is the starting SF. Like I said in the past, what's good having him at that position if he is not exploiting his opponent on the other end (having Thompson posting him up)?
Also, if you guys noticed when we put Thompson as the SF, this encourages teams to pack the paint. Other than Head, there is no perimeter shooting in that lineup. This would limit Evans drives and kicks.
The lineup just screams "PACK THE PAINT" to other teams.
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:05 am
by Wolfay
KF10 wrote:The lineup just screams "PACK THE PAINT" to other teams.
It screams a lot more than that. The league must think we're a joke.
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:11 am
by and2premiere
Ive always been a fan og PW but today...fire him plz.
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:11 am
by ADoaN17
At least there will be more offense off the bench...
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:15 am
by YC42Balla
Lmao, I don't know about you guys.. but I'm actually happy to see something new in the lineup. This will be interesting to say the least. I also like seeing JT get the start. I don't care where it's at. Let's go JT!! Prove all those haters wrong!!
Wolfay wrote:KF10 wrote:The lineup just screams "PACK THE PAINT" to other teams.
It screams a lot more than that. The league must think we're a joke.
*Edit* --I say it screams.. "REBOUNDS and Blocks"!! haha.
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:16 am
by and2premiere
it's not so much that JT is starting, it's just there were so many different lineups they could have chosen.
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:16 am
by ADoaN17
The Kings are actually leading in the first?!
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:18 am
by twoolfork1
Definatly a good start so far. Dont get this lineup tho. JT starting at the 3? Also, I don't think Head deserves to start. I guess he's quicker than Udrih
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:20 am
by ADoaN17
twoolfork1 wrote:Definatly a good start so far. Dont get this lineup tho. JT starting at the 3? Also, I don't think Head deserves to start. I guess he's quicker than Udrih
Jim Grays says PW said the lineup is for defense.
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:22 am
by Wolfay
Are we playing good or are the Knicks playing bad? Maybe I'm just dreaming.
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:27 am
by ADoaN17
The Knicks board is funny
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:36 am
by Wolfay
Jerry just said the Knicks players were overrated! LOL. I love Jerry, he speaks truth.
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:36 am
by pillwenney
Wolfay wrote:Are we playing good or are the Knicks playing bad? Maybe I'm just dreaming.
Definitely a bit of both. They were just missing shots. Now they're playing poorly. We're doing alright here though.
And Demarcus is playing by far his best D of the year. Like, I don't know where this is coming from.
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:38 am
by SacKingZZZ
Cousins is a beast
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:39 am
by AnDrOiDKing4
Lol the Knicks are soo bad and Jerry just said how they overate all their players
Amare is still bad they paid all that money for guy that doesnt pass the ball , play defense or rebounds.
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:40 am
by PaKwAn
i dont really like how reke plays... forcing things too much
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:41 am
by KingInExile
The starting lineup is certainly not what I would have proposed as my "dream team", but I won't argue with the results. The Knicks may be playing tired given that this is the 2nd of a back to back for them (and they do look sluggish). However you still have to be impressed with the overall performance in the 1st.
Re: Knicks@Kings
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:46 am
by SacKingZZZ
Since Beno came in I'm seeing way too much guard domination, and not the right kind.