Page 1 of 1
Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 12:14 am
by ICMTM
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson on Tuesday said the cost of a new sports and entertainment arena will be between $350 million and $395 million.
The mayor said a specific figure, along with details of locations and financing, will be make public by the Taylor-ICON study group on Thursday.
The mayor said a figure of $370 million reported by KCRA 3 on Monday was not correct. Four sources,briefed earlier by Taylor-ICON gave that number as the figure discussed.
Johnson the price range is lower than estimates of $500 million to $600 million from previous years, because of the new plan has a smaller footprint and would be constructed in a down economy in which building projects are less expensive.
Read more:
http://www.kcra.com/news/28009474/detai ... z1NPePKNw5
And a small update:
http://www.kcra.com/news/28023028/detail.html
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 5:32 am
by ICMTM
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2011/05/ ... 7-million/As far as the arena details themselves:
1,300 additional seats for NBA games
44 additional luxury suites
1,368 additional premium and club seats
High-resolution scoreboard and LCD flat screen displays
Additional lounges, kid zone, food and retail facilities
Event facilities and operations support to accommodate top concerts, shows, and other events
Surprisingly, when asked how much cheaper it would be to build the arena in Natomas, KHTK was informed that it would be only 1.3 percent cheaper, which comes out to just over 5 million.
The review was put together to be tailored to the Sacramento market, which included a review of comparable NBA markets as well. It was also noted that additional refinements to the revenue model may occur as more Kings specific data is incorporated into the analysis.
While the major question of how the project would be funded wasn’t answered, it was addressed via comparable arenas and their funding methods, a road arena proponents are sure to follow. Using 5 arenas (San Antonio, Kansas City, Orlando, Memphis, and the proposed Edmonton, Canada facility) as examples, funding mechanisms all showed both public and private funding. Private sources ranged from private operators, team rent payments, ticket surcharges, and overall bulk team contributions. Public sources included hotel and rental car taxes, arena sales taxes, and provincial contributions.
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 5:45 am
by Wolfay
Time to walk the walk. I sure like how it looks- SACRAMENTO in big letters shows some city pride.
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 6:27 am
by Wolfay
I didn't hear it myself, but apparently Carmichael Dave said that this can be done without a single public vote.
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 6:48 am
by dozencousins
Wolfay wrote:Time to walk the walk. I sure like how it looks- SACRAMENTO in big letters shows some city pride.
+1 on that .
I love the new look & totally concur on seeing our cities name in big letters & showing off our cities pride .
We get this done we will have our KINGS for a long time to come & it will even attract the NCAA to bring back college hoops for the big tourny as well .
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 9:05 am
by ADoaN17
That arena looks amazing.
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 2:25 pm
by ICMTM
Wolfay wrote:I didn't hear it myself, but apparently Carmichael Dave said that this can be done without a single public vote.
That's why there is a joint powers association. The JPA can approve a rental car tax, airport tax, hotel tax, etc without the need of a public vote. That's why all these other counties jumped in and said we'll help but rest assured you're not getting our county's money.
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 2:59 pm
by City of Trees
I can imagine that arena with a nice statue outside of it one day!
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 3:24 pm
by ICMTM
It also appears that it's going on the corner of 5th & H. The board is cutting off the right side of the picture. Right click and view image if you want to see the entire image.
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 3:40 pm
by City of Trees
I love the light rails are running in front of the arena! SACRAMENTO make it happen!
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 5:47 pm
by perezident
All of a sudden now train stations are making loads of money. Persons might more than likely won't want to drive their cars to games...especially if their a little ways outside Sacramento. This is wonderful. I'm so happy for you guys in Sac. I've never been to a Kings game let alone an NBA game, but whenever this gets built, you guys will have to run me away from there
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Thu May 26, 2011 5:56 pm
by ICMTM
It's being built right next to the train station, and there's supposed to be a bullet train coming through here at some point. They are already building the light north of downtown on North 7th street. My wife and I are going to celebrate by staying out all night and riding the train back home @ 6am when it finally gets to Natomas.
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Fri May 27, 2011 5:39 pm
by The Beam King
Evans Is King wrote:I love the light rails are running in front of the arena! SACRAMENTO make it happen!
Why? I'd rather drive to the arena.
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Fri May 27, 2011 5:52 pm
by City of Trees
BOOGIE-MONSTER wrote:Evans Is King wrote:I love the light rails are running in front of the arena! SACRAMENTO make it happen!
Why? I'd rather drive to the arena.
Its another option for transportation. Not only does it help with traffic but it gives fans a break from gas. I believe now a days you can get an all day pass to go anywhere in the city for less than ONE gallon of gas. People using PUBLIC transportation puts more money into the city, less into BIG OIL!
You can still drive as there are parking garages (8 i believe) within blocks of the proposed arena.
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Fri May 27, 2011 6:50 pm
by pillwenney
Yeah, I'm going to hold off my excitement until something actually gets pushed through, but this is certainly exciting.
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 5:11 pm
by ICMTM
BOOGIE-MONSTER wrote:Evans Is King wrote:I love the light rails are running in front of the arena! SACRAMENTO make it happen!
Why? I'd rather drive to the arena.
I drive all the time. It's not cool anymore. Not that driving is stressful but not driving is relaxing.
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 6:14 pm
by KingInExile
BOOGIE-MONSTER wrote:Evans Is King wrote:I love the light rails are running in front of the arena! SACRAMENTO make it happen!
Why? I'd rather drive to the arena.
One of the best things about the Rose Garden in Portland is that it is virtually a hub for light rail lines coming from just about every direction in the region. This makes the Rose Garden an attractive venue for many reasons...and not for just basketball. If the arena is coupled properly with nearby development of restaurants, similar to the area around the Rose Garden, the city will quickly have a viable entertainment district...something Sacramento desperately needs downtown. The fact that you can go down there and not worry about spending a fortune on parking, or worrying about whether someone might break into your car while it's parked there (large parking lots are always prime targets) make the light rail connection a great option.
Re: Arena Talk 3.0
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2011 5:10 am
by ADoaN17
bringing back this thread with some good news
http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/n ... arena.htmlSome 14 local chambers have lent their support to the effort to fund and develop a new arena in Sacramento.