Page 1 of 1

KINGS

Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 8:40 pm
by swissfosho
I say we go after Sessions. What do you guys think?

Re: KINGS

Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:30 pm
by Bac2Basics
What makes you think that's a good idea?
I'm thinking that Sacramento should aim higher.

Re: KINGS

Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:31 pm
by YC42Balla
IDK - sessions is a great talented young player, but I truly believe we're going to be drafting a guard; Jimmer, perhaps? Who knows. Anyways, I think we should focus on targeting SF's in the FA.

Interesting subject title by the way. It's so broad; I laughed a little.

Re: KINGS

Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:12 pm
by SacKingZZZ
Need shooters, slashers aren't a priority.

Re: KINGS

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 12:11 am
by swissfosho
Ya you guys are proly right. I just think Sessions is very underated and we could get him for cheap. We def need a S/F and someone who can shoot the three. I like Brandon Wright or Jimmer. I like Kemba but i dont see him working with Tyreke, I can see them bumping heads. Thx for the responses.

Re: KINGS

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 4:06 am
by longfellow44
Sessions is the wrong type of guard for us. His lack of a consistent 3pt shot is what makes him a terrible fit. I think we need to look at trading back in the draft a bit to move Beno for shorter contracts and then go ahead and draft Jimmer. Then focus on a small forward in free agency.

Re: KINGS

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:37 pm
by moosachi
so im guessing were giving up on casspi and greene?

Re: KINGS

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:29 pm
by Gymbo
Would you be interested in something like:

Ramon Sessions and J.J. Hickson for Francisco Garcia and #7?

It would give you a lineup of something like:

PG: Udrih/Sessions
SG: Evans/Thornton (assume re-sign)
SF: Free Agent/Casspi/Greene
PF: Hickson/Whiteside
C: Cousins/Thompson

The trade would still allow you to preserve a decent amount of cap space (depending on what happens with the CBA).

Re: KINGS

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:18 pm
by dozencousins
Gymbo wrote:Would you be interested in something like:

Ramon Sessions and J.J. Hickson for Francisco Garcia and #7?

It would give you a lineup of something like:

PG: Udrih/Sessions
SG: Evans/Thornton (assume re-sign)
SF: Free Agent/Casspi/Greene
PF: Hickson/Whiteside
C: Cousins/Thompson

The trade would still allow you to preserve a decent amount of cap space (depending on what happens with the CBA).


Not really trying to be rude at all .
The trade you mentioned has to be a joke right ?? I mean its almost laughable. Its not even close to fair for the Kings .

Re: KINGS

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 4:23 pm
by PaKwAn
Gymbo wrote:Would you be interested in something like:

Ramon Sessions and J.J. Hickson for Francisco Garcia and #7?

It would give you a lineup of something like:

PG: Udrih/Sessions
SG: Evans/Thornton (assume re-sign)
SF: Free Agent/Casspi/Greene
PF: Hickson/Whiteside
C: Cousins/Thompson

The trade would still allow you to preserve a decent amount of cap space (depending on what happens with the CBA).


i dont see the cavs trading jj for a 7th pick in a weak draft with questionable prospects.... he will benefit the most having kyrie irving on that team...

Re: KINGS

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:53 am
by SadKingsFan
PaKwAn wrote:
i dont see the cavs trading jj for a 7th pick in a weak draft with questionable prospects.... he will benefit the most having kyrie irving on that team...

Doesn't matter what the cavs would do. Kings wouldn't want him

Re: KINGS

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 4:19 pm
by PaKwAn
SadKingsFan wrote:
PaKwAn wrote:
i dont see the cavs trading jj for a 7th pick in a weak draft with questionable prospects.... he will benefit the most having kyrie irving on that team...

Doesn't matter what the cavs would do. Kings wouldn't want him



im not sure about that, right now jt is the only real pf we got.. jj would be a nice fit next to cuz because he is a good shotblocker,athletic and a good rebounder as well... im not a fan of sessions but jj is a nice player in this league.. sac would listen if the cavs offered jj...