Page 1 of 1
Nate Robinson
Posted: Thu Dec 1, 2011 12:05 am
by smith2373
With the Thunder planning on buying him out, do you guys think it would be a good idea to be a backup to Jimmer or maybe start at PG?
Re: Nate Robinson
Posted: Thu Dec 1, 2011 12:26 am
by Nicky Nix Nook
The Kings have absolutely no use for Nate Robinson. The only thing he brings to the table is offense, and we have more than enough guys who can score. He's honestly the last player we need on this team and if even if we did sign him for whatever reason, he'd be far from a starter.
Re: Nate Robinson
Posted: Thu Dec 1, 2011 1:20 am
by dozencousins
Kings do not need Nate . If the Kings was to go after a point guard he better be a floor general or a game changer . Nate is neither of those .
Re: Nate Robinson
Posted: Thu Dec 1, 2011 1:51 am
by ADoaN17
No way. No space on the team and he this team needs more leaders/mature people.
Re: Nate Robinson
Posted: Thu Dec 1, 2011 3:53 am
by DieHardKingsFan
No need for Nate...we have another U-Dub guy, Isaiah Thomas, who can do all the things Nate can do but is a better floor leader.
Re: Nate Robinson
Posted: Thu Dec 1, 2011 3:56 am
by RIPskaterdude
Yeah, already have a Nate Robinson in Isiah Thomas.
Re: Nate Robinson
Posted: Thu Dec 1, 2011 4:29 am
by City of Trees
Between Jimmer, Thomas, and Thornton on the Roster the Kings have no need for Nate. Im cool.
Re: Nate Robinson
Posted: Thu Dec 1, 2011 5:33 am
by OGSactownballer
NO.
Re: Nate Robinson
Posted: Thu Dec 1, 2011 10:41 pm
by Krimzen
It would have made some sense a year or two ago, but the team is loaded with young guards of all shapes/sizes/skillsets now. Would be especially dumb considering he has a rep as a knucklehead, which is not the sort of guy you want around our young players.
Re: Nate Robinson
Posted: Fri Dec 2, 2011 11:17 pm
by Draino
I LOVE Nate, but I don't want him on this team.