Page 1 of 1
Trade
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 2:59 am
by franklin
Jazz fan here. Wondering what you all think about trading Jimmer for Gordon Hayward straight up?
Hayward is much bigger and has a great shot.
Thank you.
Re: Trade
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:01 am
by City of Trees
I dont think Jimmer is going anywhere. Kings are so high on this guy PW has memorized all the lines from the movie 'How High'
Re: Trade
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:02 am
by City of Trees
And to answer your question. NO
Re: Trade
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:27 am
by pillwenney
Noooooope.
Re: Trade
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:50 am
by SacKingZZZ
Yeah, no way. Jimmer is already showing he's a perfect fit for this team and now the Kings finally have two guys that can make teams pay for packing the paint in he and Marcus. With Jimmer and Marcus the Kings have a shot to be one of the better 3 point shooting teams in the league.
Re: Trade
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:52 am
by OGSactownballer
Not gonna happen.
There's a really big WASP population in Sac (not unlike the heavy Mormon population in SLC) that just loves a good old fashioned white boy baller.
He is as good as California GOLT to the Kings!
Re: Trade
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:31 am
by dozencousins
I am guessing this thread will be locked who knows .
Anyways there is no way SAC does this as its laughable IMO .
Re: Trade
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:51 am
by ADoaN17
dozencousins wrote:Anyways there is no way SAC does this as its laughable IMO .
Re: Trade
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:15 pm
by franklin
I understand the team fit and all but you don't seem to know Hayward AT ALL. He's a play maker and a shooter too, only much bigger. You haven't thought of how he would fit into your team.
Re: Trade
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:42 pm
by BadWolf
OGSactownballer wrote:Not gonna happen.
There's a really big WASP population in Sac (not unlike the heavy Mormon population in SLC) that just loves a good old fashioned white boy baller.
He is as good as California GOLT to the Kings!
could it get more lod fashioned white then this?
Re: Trade
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:47 pm
by RoyalCourtJestr
franklin wrote:I understand the team fit and all but you don't seem to know Hayward AT ALL. He's a play maker and a shooter too, only much bigger. You haven't thought of how he would fit into your team.
Ditto for you, you don't seem to know this team very much
Re: Trade
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:48 pm
by franklin
RoyalCourtJestr wrote:Ditto for you, you don't seem to know this team very much
You're right. That's why I'm asking Kings fans. Do you have any insight to offer?
Re: Trade
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:52 pm
by Call Me Geoff
My insight is Jimmer is a star and Hayward is a run of the mill SF. NO WAY.
Re: Trade
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:46 pm
by SacKingZZZ
Franklin, anyone that's knocking Hayward is just being defensive, please forgive them, they've caught Jimmer fever.
Haywards a very young and good prospect. Much like a SF version of Jimmer IMO. However, Jimmer mania is spreading!! You can't stop this fire.
J/K, kind of.
Re: Trade
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:50 pm
by SacKingZZZ
Call Me Geoff wrote:My insight is Jimmer is a star and Hayward is a run of the mill SF. NO WAY.
I don't know, kind of early to call Jimmer a star though don't you think? Great potential but c'mon, lets not get cocky here.
Hayward is a very good player and he came on strong when given the opportunity last year. Honestly, I know Jimmer and the Utah connection has value, but why would the Jazz even want to lose a player at a position they need for one they don't?
BTW, in April last year when Hayward got some burn he KILLED it. KILLED IT for those that didn't pay any attention. I however did.
Re: Trade
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 12:43 am
by The Beam King
franklin wrote:I understand the team fit and all but you don't seem to know Hayward AT ALL. He's a play maker and a shooter too, only much bigger. You haven't thought of how he would fit into your team.
I'll pass on the younger Kyle Korver. Dime a dozen.
Re: Trade
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:27 pm
by artest420
franklin wrote:Jazz fan here. Wondering what you all think about trading Jimmer for Gordon Hayward straight up?
Hayward is much bigger and has a great shot.
Thank you.
Better chance of trading Tyreke for Gordon. Jimmer only misses when he wants to give the other team a chance to stay in the game.
Re: Trade
Posted: Tue Jan 3, 2012 1:26 am
by old rem
franklin wrote:I understand the team fit and all but you don't seem to know Hayward AT ALL. He's a play maker and a shooter too, only much bigger. You haven't thought of how he would fit into your team.
I'm not a Kings guy...but if a was I'd be all in your face and WTF ? Jimmer is a good fit for Sac. Hayward is fine but somewhat limited,almost has hit his peak as a smart+ skilled guy but not a freak athlete.
Re: Trade
Posted: Tue Jan 3, 2012 6:51 pm
by dozencousins
On a different note : Manu is out for the season for the Spurs with s broken hand . I could eaasily see the Spurs turning to the Kings for a trade as we hhave to many wing players as it is .
Re: Trade
Posted: Wed Jan 4, 2012 3:23 pm
by Sparky6string
No way Utah would do this- they'd be trading a half a foot away. Also Utah doesn't need a Jimmer they need a playmaker.