I apologize if this has been asked, and i'm sure it has been, but we memphis fans have been kicking around the idea of...
Rudy Gay and 25
for
Thornton and 5
Would kings fans be interested in that?
I know that is a lot of salary to take back, it works with adding chuck hayes as well
thoughts
You Get Gay
Re: You Get Gay
- pillwenney
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 48,887
- And1: 2,603
- Joined: Sep 19, 2004
- Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
- Contact:
-
Re: You Get Gay
I'd have to consider something like it. Not sure if I'd pull the trigger though.
Re: You Get Gay
- boogie-reke
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,919
- And1: 244
- Joined: Nov 05, 2010
-
Re: You Get Gay
No, this trade is selling us short BIG TIME.
By this trade, even if we agree to value Gay and the #5 the same (and there's no reason why the Kings should do that as we need to get more in such deal IE dumping salary/pick/sweetener considering his overpaid long contract) - then you're saying Thornton = #25, which is way off base, so we're losing on both fronts.
#5 > Gay
Thornton > #25
Anyways in general, I don't think Gay is a good fit for us as another high volume, high usage offensive player.. I would much rather trade for guys like Iggy or Deng in terms of fit.
By this trade, even if we agree to value Gay and the #5 the same (and there's no reason why the Kings should do that as we need to get more in such deal IE dumping salary/pick/sweetener considering his overpaid long contract) - then you're saying Thornton = #25, which is way off base, so we're losing on both fronts.
#5 > Gay
Thornton > #25
Anyways in general, I don't think Gay is a good fit for us as another high volume, high usage offensive player.. I would much rather trade for guys like Iggy or Deng in terms of fit.
Re: You Get Gay
- pillwenney
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 48,887
- And1: 2,603
- Joined: Sep 19, 2004
- Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
- Contact:
-
Re: You Get Gay
Yeah. Good points, I suppose. I'll lean towards a no.
Re: You Get Gay
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: You Get Gay
Not sure I'd even trade Thornton for Gay straight across.
Re: You Get Gay
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 905
- And1: 92
- Joined: Dec 27, 2007
-
Re: You Get Gay
Gay is a better player and a better fit than Thornton. Gay could play with Tyreke and help make up for the shooting deficiencies. The salary is killer, so we'd HAVE to be sending out some salary, either Thornton or Salmons. Thornton for Gay or #5+Salmons for Gay.
Re: You Get Gay
- City of Trees
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 15,851
- And1: 5,511
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
-
Re: You Get Gay
SacKingZZZ wrote:Not sure I'd even trade Thornton for Gay straight across.
Now that is a little homer-ish

Talent wise there is no comparison Gay is the superior talent. I guess the only way I could see it your way is Gay's contract.
Re: You Get Gay
- YC42Balla
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,054
- And1: 62
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: NorCal
Re: You Get Gay
I actually like Gay, too. He's a great player. But I'd rather keep the 5th, and Thornton.
SAC-RA-MEN-TO #HEREWESTAYED
Re: You Get Gay
- City of Trees
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 15,851
- And1: 5,511
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
-
Re: You Get Gay
Evans + Jimmer for Gay... Boom.
Re: You Get Gay
- YC42Balla
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,054
- And1: 62
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: NorCal
Re: You Get Gay
Evans Is King wrote:Evans + Jimmer for Gay... Boom.
I like it.

SAC-RA-MEN-TO #HEREWESTAYED
Re: You Get Gay
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: You Get Gay
Evans Is King wrote:SacKingZZZ wrote:Not sure I'd even trade Thornton for Gay straight across.
Now that is a little homer-ish![]()
Talent wise there is no comparison Gay is the superior talent. I guess the only way I could see it your way is Gay's contract.
Contract it is. Putting Gays physical gifts aside for a moment, which is fair considering both play different positions, both players values are based on production potential. Gay will get you 18-20 ppg for 17 million a year. Thornton will get you 18-20 ppg for 7 million a year. Homer-ish? Nah, I don't think so. It's more likely the Kings find a good player to stick at SF than they can find a replacement for Thornton right now. Keep Thornton and go after a shooter/defender at SF, Fields or Batum.
Re: You Get Gay
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,749
- And1: 774
- Joined: Mar 01, 2006
- Location: Sacramento, CA
-
Re: You Get Gay
#5 + Salmons for Gay has some legs to it. No way you get Thornton.