ImageImageImageImageImage

Salmons

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

Salmons 

Post#1 » by Vindicater » Sat Jul 7, 2012 3:38 am

What is the deal with him?

Will he play this year? Will he revert to some sort of form or will he sit at the end of the bench pouting?
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
User avatar
ADoaN17
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,044
And1: 312
Joined: Feb 11, 2010
   

Re: Salmons 

Post#2 » by ADoaN17 » Sat Jul 7, 2012 3:39 am

I guess you will have to wait and see like the rest of us....
Image
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Salmons 

Post#3 » by SacKingZZZ » Sat Jul 7, 2012 8:00 am

Right now it looks like he might very well be the starting 3 man.
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Salmons 

Post#4 » by KF10 » Sat Jul 7, 2012 8:44 am

He looked terrible when he started @ SF for the Kings but when he came off the bench, he looked real solid. Which is surprising because Salmons is known to be "better starter/worse reserve" type of players.

Unfortunately, Petrie/Smart still has a lot of faith in Salmons and I won't be surprised he goes back to a starting role (SF) next year.
User avatar
SacTown Kings
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,865
And1: 180
Joined: May 12, 2003

Re: Salmons 

Post#5 » by SacTown Kings » Sat Jul 7, 2012 3:28 pm

The deal with Salmons is he is overpaid and he sucks. Last season he was probably the worst player on the team and single handedly cost us a handful of games. But this is the Kings so to answer your question yes he will play this year, probably be the starter and most likely play a lot of minutes <sigh>.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,976
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Salmons 

Post#6 » by WiscoKing13 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 6:40 pm

Any interest in a gooden for salmons type deal?? You guys already have garcia and a few others at SG/SF, maybe gooden could even out the roster?
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
User avatar
SacTown Kings
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,865
And1: 180
Joined: May 12, 2003

Re: Salmons 

Post#7 » by SacTown Kings » Sun Jul 8, 2012 6:49 pm

I'd love to move Salmons but Gooden doesn't make much sense. It doesn't save the Kings any money and with Thompson, DMC, Robinson, Hayes and Whiteside there is no need for Gooden. Salmons sucked last year but sf is our weakest position so we could use Salmons more than Gooden.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,976
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Salmons 

Post#8 » by WiscoKing13 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 6:54 pm

SacTown Kings wrote:I'd love to move Salmons but Gooden doesn't make much sense. It doesn't save the Kings any money and with Thompson, DMC, Robinson, Hayes and Whiteside there is no need for Gooden. Salmons sucked last year but sf is our weakest position so we could use Salmons more than Gooden.

What if the trade was something like
Sac Gets
Hedo

Bucks Get
Salmons

Magic Get
Gooden

??
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
User avatar
SacTown Kings
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,865
And1: 180
Joined: May 12, 2003

Re: Salmons 

Post#9 » by SacTown Kings » Sun Jul 8, 2012 7:05 pm

No. I do like Hedo more than Salmons but over the next 2 years it will cost the Kings around 8 million more, not sure if it's worth it for a declining Hedo. If we could throw in Outlaw that would make up most of the 8 million.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,976
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Salmons 

Post#10 » by WiscoKing13 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 7:15 pm

SacTown Kings wrote:No. I do like Hedo more than Salmons but over the next 2 years it will cost the Kings around 8 million more, not sure if it's worth it for a declining Hedo. If we could throw in Outlaw that would make up most of the 8 million.

its actually even I think

12-13
Hedo-11.8
Salmons-8.1
-3.7

13-14
Hedo waived-6 mil
Salmons-7.6
+1.6

14-15
Salmons waived-1 mil
+1

So its about 100K difference
User avatar
SacTown Kings
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,865
And1: 180
Joined: May 12, 2003

Re: Salmons 

Post#11 » by SacTown Kings » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:06 pm

Hmm I didn't know Hedo could be waived. Yet if we are just going to waive Hedo and the money ends up being the same either way then it seems like such a lateral move. I'm not seeing the benefit for the Kings, Salmons sucks but he's not a locker room cancer. I think we only trade him if we can save money. The Magoofs are all about penny pinching and saving money.
User avatar
SacTown Kings
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,865
And1: 180
Joined: May 12, 2003

Re: Salmons 

Post#12 » by SacTown Kings » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:09 pm

Not to mention if we trade Salmons, and waive Hedo, then we really do not have an adequate sf. Garcia is not good enough to start plus he is always injured, Greene wont be back, and Outlaw is not very good. So we would still have to try and sign a sf which will cost money, so in the end it would still end up costing more money, unless we decided to roll with Outlaw and Garcia (yuck!).

Return to Sacramento Kings