Page 1 of 1

Aaron Brooks?

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:29 am
by SactownHrtBrks8
I know we had interest in him not too long ago. I know he is an unrestricted free agent now

Re: Aaron Brooks?

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:51 am
by City of Trees
If im Petrie I dont make PG moves until I see how Jimmer has developed in Summer League. If Jimmer shows he just cannot grasp the concept of running the offense Brooks is a good alternative if he is cheap.

Re: Aaron Brooks?

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:54 am
by SacKingZZZ
That's the thing, you can't really look to spread the floor with more undersized guards and squashing Fredette any further really does mean you wasted a top 10 pick. If your best shooting team is Thomas, Brooks, and Fredette, you don't know what the heck you're doing as a GM.

Re: Aaron Brooks?

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:59 am
by City of Trees
Dont forget Thornton who is what an inch or two taller :lol:

Im hoping Jimmer will show some growth and solidify himself as our backup PG.

Re: Aaron Brooks?

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:04 am
by SacKingZZZ
Evans Is King wrote:Dont forget Thornton who is what an inch or two taller :lol:

Im hoping Jimmer will show some growth and solidify himself as our backup PG.


Oh, he's the PF of that group. :lol:

Re: Aaron Brooks?

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:08 am
by SactownHrtBrks8
I am not sold at Isaiah Thomas being a starting PG in the league. He had a very solid rookie year, but i am still not comfortable going forward with Thomas as a long term starter.

Re: Aaron Brooks?

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:46 am
by 408Kings
I don't feel comfortable with ANY of our guards running the show full time. None of them are natural PGs. Evans has always been a score first and pass only out of necessity player. Jimmer and Thornton are practically the same - undersized 2's. And IT is probably the most capable, but even he is probably better suited playing a Bobby Jackson type role.

Re: Aaron Brooks?

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 4:07 pm
by City of Trees
Did the team NOT get better when Thomas ran the show? Thomas has what it takes to be a natural PG. You gotta remember he had to do it all in UW so a transition is expected. Dude can ball, give him time to develop.

Re: Aaron Brooks?

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:17 pm
by pillwenney
Evans Is King wrote:Did the team NOT get better when Thomas ran the show? Thomas has what it takes to be a natural PG. You gotta remember he had to do it all in UW so a transition is expected. Dude can ball, give him time to develop.


It's all relative though. Compared to what we had before him, sure, he was John **** Stockton. But compared to what actually works at PG in this league...no.

Aaron Brooks isn't the answer either though.