RealGM

Isaiah Thomas has reached agreement with the Phoenix Suns and will be dealt as a sign-and-trade on a four-year, $27 million contract.

Thomas is a restricted free agent of the Sacramento Kings.

The Kings will receive a $7 million traded player exception, along with the draft rights to Alex Oriakhi.

http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/23 ... With-Kings

That's it?

I'd rather have Thomas at 6.7 mill than Collison at 5.

Thing here is no way Thomas comes back to Sac for 6.7 per year. The Only reason his deal is so low is the Kings probably agreed not to match.



Sent from my SM-G900T using RealGM Forums mobile app

Thomas is now the best contract in the NBA.

Sent from my SM-G900T using RealGM Forums mobile app

Ganna miss that guy. Idk what Pete is thinking letting Isaiah walk for 6.75 mil but that TPE is very much needed if they actually use it...

If he handles the ball for half the clock in Phoenix like he did in Sacramento he's a steal. He's proven he can produce at a near elite level, but with players like that it's all about situation. I don't think he can get near the usage there that he did with the Kings.

So overpay Collison 5+ some change.

Let IT walk for 6.75?



[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd2B6SjMh_w[/youtube]

Either pay real talent like IT, or go on the cheap.

Tired of this mid level for garbage never ending bs.

Collison now officially in the Jarl Thomandry 2.0 welfare check alliance.

ADoaN17 wrote:Ganna miss that guy. Idk what Pete is thinking letting Isaiah walk for 6.75 mil but that TPE is very much needed if they actually use it...

Collison is a better fit. Still had to hope the Kings got some talent in return for IT. They didn't so overall well, lets just say Stauskas better be statue worthy when his career is done.

To be honest, I am not that upset with a PG rotation of Collison and Ray. We kinda have 2 point guards that are long, decent defenders (both these guys can press full court), and can hit a shot. They are no IT on the offensive end but I think the idea was to allow Stauskas and BigMac to get more touches.

blind prophet wrote:Jarl Thomandry

I would like to be the first here to vote we stop using this name.

Sent from my SM-G900T using RealGM Forums mobile app

The front office definitely have a plan in place if they didn't match the offer sheet.

4/27? That's an excellent value for a guy like Thomas.

To put things in perspective:

Landry's deal was 4/26.

and said no to 4/27 for Thomas.

SacKingZZZ wrote:Collison is a better fit. Still had to hope the Kings got some talent in return for IT. They didn't so overall well, lets just say Stauskas better be statue worthy when his career is done.

I think this is what boils down too.

Fit.

They felt Thomas didn't fit with the roster they envisioned.

KF10 wrote:The front office definitely have a plan in place if they didn't match the offer sheet.

4/27? That's an excellent value for a guy like Thomas.

To put things in perspective:

Landry's deal was 4/26.

and said no to 4/27 for Thomas.

Yeah it's called not paying a huge luxury bill.

KF10 wrote:The front office definitely have a plan in place if they didn't match the offer sheet.

4/27? That's an excellent value for a guy like Thomas.

To put things in perspective:

Landry's deal was 4/26.

and said no to 4/27 for Thomas.

Are you saying they have a plan in place to get another PG or a trade in general?

SacKingZZZ wrote:Yeah it's called not paying a huge luxury bill.

It's not just that, they didn't view Thomas as the future PG in their vision.

SacTown916 wrote:Are you saying they have a plan in place to get another PG or a trade in general?

Not sure but this process is an on-going puzzle that keeps changing lol

SacTown916 wrote:

KF10 wrote:The front office definitely have a plan in place if they didn't match the offer sheet.

4/27? That's an excellent value for a guy like Thomas.

To put things in perspective:

Landry's deal was 4/26.

and said no to 4/27 for Thomas.

Are you saying they have a plan in place to get another PG or a trade in general?

I'm not sure myself. Half of the moves they've made are of the "wing'n it" variety. You can't go anywhere with that mentality. That pattern of GM'ing was set in stone well before this new group took over. At least the Collison signing makes some sense on paper.

City of Trees wrote:

blind prophet wrote:Jarl Thomandry

I would like to be the first here to vote we stop using this name.

Sent from my SM-G900T using RealGM Forums mobile app

How about Jarleen Thompandrison?

Ok with the 7 million TPE, that's pretty close to a Thompson with his kicker or Landry for Smith deal.

How would that work with us being around the hard cap?

blind prophet wrote:Ok with the 7 million TPE, that's pretty close to a Thompson with his kicker or Landry for Smith deal.

How would that work with us being around the hard cap?

Not sure if this is what you mean but you can't combine a TPE with a player in a trade. The TPE is only good for a team looking to cut salary. Doubtful it gets used.

bleeds_purple wrote:

City of Trees wrote:

blind prophet wrote:Jarl Thomandry

I would like to be the first here to vote we stop using this name.

Sent from my SM-G900T using RealGM Forums mobile app

How about Jarleen Thompandrison?

No. Combining names is just to me.
My vote is it stops. But I'm only one man.

So I guess us fans can now connect this $7m TPE to the Kings shopping hard for a PF.

Sent from my SM-G900T using RealGM Forums mobile app