ImageImageImageImageImage

Tyreke Evans

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

DoItALL9
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,916
And1: 1,336
Joined: Oct 08, 2016
       

Tyreke Evans 

Post#1 » by DoItALL9 » Wed Mar 1, 2017 6:52 pm

Any word on why he didn't choose to wear his previous jersey number?
Castor_Troy
Senior
Posts: 577
And1: 67
Joined: Jul 08, 2003

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#2 » by Castor_Troy » Wed Mar 1, 2017 7:20 pm

That's Big Papa's number now
User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#3 » by City of Trees » Wed Mar 1, 2017 7:43 pm

I thought 32 was a nod to Francisco Garcia. Just a hunch.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
benchmobbin02
Veteran
Posts: 2,976
And1: 364
Joined: May 28, 2015
     

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#4 » by benchmobbin02 » Wed Mar 1, 2017 8:53 pm

City of Trees wrote:I thought 32 was a nod to Francisco Garcia. Just a hunch.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


Didn't he say that or were you just being unnecessarily sarcastic... :)
MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!
User avatar
codydaze
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 6,470
And1: 5,024
Joined: Jul 06, 2013
Location: Sacramento, CA
     

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#5 » by codydaze » Thu Mar 2, 2017 2:27 am

City of Trees wrote:I thought 32 was a nod to Francisco Garcia. Just a hunch.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


El Flaco!
teerfour+40LG
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,468
And1: 2,129
Joined: Feb 28, 2012
 

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#6 » by teerfour+40LG » Thu Mar 2, 2017 3:54 am

benchmobbin02 wrote:
City of Trees wrote:I thought 32 was a nod to Francisco Garcia. Just a hunch.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


Didn't he say that or were you just being unnecessarily sarcastic... :)

I think it's more likely that Tyreke has completely forgotten about Cisco. See:

sacking123
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,464
And1: 1,348
Joined: Jul 23, 2004
Location: Office
Contact:
 

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#7 » by sacking123 » Thu Mar 2, 2017 4:24 am

teerfour+40LG wrote:
benchmobbin02 wrote:
City of Trees wrote:I thought 32 was a nod to Francisco Garcia. Just a hunch.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


Didn't he say that or were you just being unnecessarily sarcastic... :)

I think it's more likely that Tyreke has completely forgotten about Cisco. See:


Bahaha


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Sacramento Kings
Sydney Kings
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,375
And1: 9,078
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#8 » by Dan Z » Thu Mar 9, 2017 6:33 am

After the season do you plan on resigning him?
Silver Man
Starter
Posts: 2,129
And1: 644
Joined: Jun 03, 2007
 

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#9 » by Silver Man » Thu Mar 9, 2017 10:46 pm

Dan Z wrote:After the season do you plan on resigning him?


Hopefully not.
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#10 » by KF10 » Thu Mar 9, 2017 11:54 pm

If he's willing to accept a 6th man/bench role, I say "why not?" As long as it doesn't cost us too much to retain him.
benchmobbin02
Veteran
Posts: 2,976
And1: 364
Joined: May 28, 2015
     

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#11 » by benchmobbin02 » Fri Mar 10, 2017 12:57 am

KF10 wrote:If he's willing to accept a 6th man/bench role, I say "why not?" As long as it doesn't cost us too much to retain him.


Yup, Can score, pass and defend. Has size to defend 3 positions. Can hand the ball and run the offense and get to the rim. Wouldn't be mad at having him on the roster while our young guards learn. I think we'll draft a PG but he won't be ready to fully take over for atleast a year, maybe 2. Gonna need ball handlers and second unit scoring in the mean time.
MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#12 » by SacKingZZZ » Fri Mar 10, 2017 1:49 am

The Kings will have to spend some serious money if they don't guarantee the full deals on Afflalo and Tolliver, but I'd be more than surprised if Evans came back. He can help plenty of teams. Plus with Malachi here and Bogdanovic (assuming he comes over), I just don't see it as benefiting anyone moving forward. That would mean Evans at PG and the Kings already tried that one out 2 knee surgeries ago. Temple is here long term to fill the leadership/extra ball handler role. Buddy, Malachi, Bogdanovic, and Temple is more than enough considering the Kings will have to draft or sign a real SF. That's been easily the biggest weakness since the trade.
User avatar
KingsMilz
Sophomore
Posts: 144
And1: 23
Joined: Dec 12, 2013

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#13 » by KingsMilz » Fri Mar 10, 2017 2:36 am

SacKingZZZ wrote:The Kings will have to spend some serious money if they don't guarantee the full deals on Afflalo and Tolliver, but I'd be more than surprised if Evans came back. He can help plenty of teams. Plus with Malachi here and Bogdanovic (assuming he comes over), I just don't see it as benefiting anyone moving forward. That would mean Evans at PG and the Kings already tried that one out 2 knee surgeries ago. Temple is here long term to fill the leadership/extra ball handler role. Buddy, Malachi, Bogdanovic, and Temple is more than enough considering the Kings will have to draft or sign a real SF. That's been easily the biggest weakness since the trade.

None of those guys imo are ball handlers, they can dribble a ball over halfcourt but none of them (maybe Bogdanovic can but I doubt it) can breakdown a defense on a regular basis like Tyreke. As long as we get a ball handler who can breakdown the D at will (I don't think Collison can either although he's better than all those other guys listed) than yeah don't bring Reke back but if we don't than you should look to bring him back as a 6th man imo.

I would really like to sign Jeff Teague to like a 3-4 year deal if we don't draft a stud PG in that case we should let Tyreke go. If we are looking for a SF to sign/trade for than look maybe at Wilson Chandler he's been unhappy in his role in Denver for sometime I'm sure they will be looking to move him to free up playing time for Hernan-gomez next year.

The real exciting part of the Cousins trade it now allows for a lot of possibilities in terms of building and who we can try bring in and not having to worry about all the extra crap.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#14 » by SacKingZZZ » Fri Mar 10, 2017 10:23 am

KingsMilz wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:The Kings will have to spend some serious money if they don't guarantee the full deals on Afflalo and Tolliver, but I'd be more than surprised if Evans came back. He can help plenty of teams. Plus with Malachi here and Bogdanovic (assuming he comes over), I just don't see it as benefiting anyone moving forward. That would mean Evans at PG and the Kings already tried that one out 2 knee surgeries ago. Temple is here long term to fill the leadership/extra ball handler role. Buddy, Malachi, Bogdanovic, and Temple is more than enough considering the Kings will have to draft or sign a real SF. That's been easily the biggest weakness since the trade.

None of those guys imo are ball handlers, they can dribble a ball over halfcourt but none of them (maybe Bogdanovic can but I doubt it) can breakdown a defense on a regular basis like Tyreke. As long as we get a ball handler who can breakdown the D at will (I don't think Collison can either although he's better than all those other guys listed) than yeah don't bring Reke back but if we don't than you should look to bring him back as a 6th man imo.

I would really like to sign Jeff Teague to like a 3-4 year deal if we don't draft a stud PG in that case we should let Tyreke go. If we are looking for a SF to sign/trade for than look maybe at Wilson Chandler he's been unhappy in his role in Denver for sometime I'm sure they will be looking to move him to free up playing time for Hernan-gomez next year.

The real exciting part of the Cousins trade it now allows for a lot of possibilities in terms of building and who we can try bring in and not having to worry about all the extra crap.


That's why I prefaced Reke playing SG/SF vs. PG. If he were to play and not crunch the others out it would be at PG which I'm not sure that's the best fit for young budding players.

Bogdanovic would be an extra ball handler. He's similar and he can get to the rim and make plays for others. I think more emphasis will be placed on pick and roll and motion vs. guard creation at the rim anyway.
benchmobbin02
Veteran
Posts: 2,976
And1: 364
Joined: May 28, 2015
     

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#15 » by benchmobbin02 » Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:42 pm

SacKingZZZ wrote:
KingsMilz wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:The Kings will have to spend some serious money if they don't guarantee the full deals on Afflalo and Tolliver, but I'd be more than surprised if Evans came back. He can help plenty of teams. Plus with Malachi here and Bogdanovic (assuming he comes over), I just don't see it as benefiting anyone moving forward. That would mean Evans at PG and the Kings already tried that one out 2 knee surgeries ago. Temple is here long term to fill the leadership/extra ball handler role. Buddy, Malachi, Bogdanovic, and Temple is more than enough considering the Kings will have to draft or sign a real SF. That's been easily the biggest weakness since the trade.

None of those guys imo are ball handlers, they can dribble a ball over halfcourt but none of them (maybe Bogdanovic can but I doubt it) can breakdown a defense on a regular basis like Tyreke. As long as we get a ball handler who can breakdown the D at will (I don't think Collison can either although he's better than all those other guys listed) than yeah don't bring Reke back but if we don't than you should look to bring him back as a 6th man imo.

I would really like to sign Jeff Teague to like a 3-4 year deal if we don't draft a stud PG in that case we should let Tyreke go. If we are looking for a SF to sign/trade for than look maybe at Wilson Chandler he's been unhappy in his role in Denver for sometime I'm sure they will be looking to move him to free up playing time for Hernan-gomez next year.

The real exciting part of the Cousins trade it now allows for a lot of possibilities in terms of building and who we can try bring in and not having to worry about all the extra crap.


That's why I prefaced Reke playing SG/SF vs. PG. If he were to play and not crunch the others out it would be at PG which I'm not sure that's the best fit for young budding players.

Bogdanovic would be an extra ball handler. He's similar and he can get to the rim and make plays for others. I think more emphasis will be placed on pick and roll and motion vs. guard creation at the rim anyway.



All that is true but Bogdan and any rookie PG we bring in are gonna have a learning curve and adjustment time. It wouldn't be smart to go into the year without another guy like Reke who has experience running an offense and has the skills that I mentioned before to lean on, plus to have in case of injury.
MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#16 » by SacKingZZZ » Fri Mar 10, 2017 10:55 pm

benchmobbin02 wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:
KingsMilz wrote:None of those guys imo are ball handlers, they can dribble a ball over halfcourt but none of them (maybe Bogdanovic can but I doubt it) can breakdown a defense on a regular basis like Tyreke. As long as we get a ball handler who can breakdown the D at will (I don't think Collison can either although he's better than all those other guys listed) than yeah don't bring Reke back but if we don't than you should look to bring him back as a 6th man imo.

I would really like to sign Jeff Teague to like a 3-4 year deal if we don't draft a stud PG in that case we should let Tyreke go. If we are looking for a SF to sign/trade for than look maybe at Wilson Chandler he's been unhappy in his role in Denver for sometime I'm sure they will be looking to move him to free up playing time for Hernan-gomez next year.

The real exciting part of the Cousins trade it now allows for a lot of possibilities in terms of building and who we can try bring in and not having to worry about all the extra crap.


That's why I prefaced Reke playing SG/SF vs. PG. If he were to play and not crunch the others out it would be at PG which I'm not sure that's the best fit for young budding players.

Bogdanovic would be an extra ball handler. He's similar and he can get to the rim and make plays for others. I think more emphasis will be placed on pick and roll and motion vs. guard creation at the rim anyway.



All that is true but Bogdan and any rookie PG we bring in are gonna have a learning curve and adjustment time. It wouldn't be smart to go into the year without another guy like Reke who has experience running an offense and has the skills that I mentioned before to lean on, plus to have in case of injury.



Yes, but once again, here are the Kings "young" pieces ages next year: Buddy Hield - 24 yo, Willie Cauley-Stein - 24 yo, Bogdan Bogdanovic - 25 yo. We don't need to go in circles but it's the same thing, if you're going to lose anyway I say get the experience while you can before it's too late a la Ben McLemore. The fact is contractually you're already about a year behind, and age wise you're probably 2-3 years behind. If these players aren't well on their way to developed by next year then expectations must be lowered and contingencies must be assessed.

I'm sure they'll come into next season with someone that has experience. Personally I wouldn't mind Collison being back, I think he fits the squad at PG in Joergers offense more than Reke does. Reke is a solo scorer, not a real system guy.
benchmobbin02
Veteran
Posts: 2,976
And1: 364
Joined: May 28, 2015
     

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#17 » by benchmobbin02 » Sat Mar 11, 2017 3:53 am

SacKingZZZ wrote:
benchmobbin02 wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:
That's why I prefaced Reke playing SG/SF vs. PG. If he were to play and not crunch the others out it would be at PG which I'm not sure that's the best fit for young budding players.

Bogdanovic would be an extra ball handler. He's similar and he can get to the rim and make plays for others. I think more emphasis will be placed on pick and roll and motion vs. guard creation at the rim anyway.



All that is true but Bogdan and any rookie PG we bring in are gonna have a learning curve and adjustment time. It wouldn't be smart to go into the year without another guy like Reke who has experience running an offense and has the skills that I mentioned before to lean on, plus to have in case of injury.



Yes, but once again, here are the Kings "young" pieces ages next year: Buddy Hield - 24 yo, Willie Cauley-Stein - 24 yo, Bogdan Bogdanovic - 25 yo. We don't need to go in circles but it's the same thing, if you're going to lose anyway I say get the experience while you can before it's too late a la Ben McLemore. The fact is contractually you're already about a year behind, and age wise you're probably 2-3 years behind. If these players aren't well on their way to developed by next year then expectations must be lowered and contingencies must be assessed.

I'm sure they'll come into next season with someone that has experience. Personally I wouldn't mind Collison being back, I think he fits the squad at PG in Joergers offense more than Reke does. Reke is a solo scorer, not a real system guy.


I think Collison is gone. Fresh start.

Reke may not be a traditional PG but he fits alot of holes a young team would have, super versatile. Not confident he is back either but would like him as a bench guy that can come in and start at 3 different positions if needed.
MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!
andy249
Ballboy
Posts: 26
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 07, 2017

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#18 » by andy249 » Sat Mar 11, 2017 12:51 pm

I would be cautious with Reke. If you can get him below market value for $10M or below per year for less than 4 years, it may be worth a look. That being said, I wouldn't invest any major money in a guy who isn't a great long range shooter (career .294 3P%) and who doesn't get to the basket as much anymore (sub 4 FT attempts per game the last three years).
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,907
And1: 12,054
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: RE: Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#19 » by LightTheBeam » Sat Mar 11, 2017 6:01 pm

KingsMilz wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:The Kings will have to spend some serious money if they don't guarantee the full deals on Afflalo and Tolliver, but I'd be more than surprised if Evans came back. He can help plenty of teams. Plus with Malachi here and Bogdanovic (assuming he comes over), I just don't see it as benefiting anyone moving forward. That would mean Evans at PG and the Kings already tried that one out 2 knee surgeries ago. Temple is here long term to fill the leadership/extra ball handler role. Buddy, Malachi, Bogdanovic, and Temple is more than enough considering the Kings will have to draft or sign a real SF. That's been easily the biggest weakness since the trade.

None of those guys imo are ball handlers, they can dribble a ball over halfcourt but none of them (maybe Bogdanovic can but I doubt it) can breakdown a defense on a regular basis like Tyreke. As long as we get a ball handler who can breakdown the D at will (I don't think Collison can either although he's better than all those other guys listed) than yeah don't bring Reke back but if we don't than you should look to bring him back as a 6th man imo.

I would really like to sign Jeff Teague to like a 3-4 year deal if we don't draft a stud PG in that case we should let Tyreke go. If we are looking for a SF to sign/trade for than look maybe at Wilson Chandler he's been unhappy in his role in Denver for sometime I'm sure they will be looking to move him to free up playing time for Hernan-gomez next year.

The real exciting part of the Cousins trade it now allows for a lot of possibilities in terms of building and who we can try bring in and not having to worry about all the extra crap.

1st and foremost I don't think we have any chance at signing Teague. We couldn't get a player of his caliber when we had Cousins, barring an extreme overpay I don't think we could get him now.

2nd these moves seem very shortsighted, bringing in Teague and Wilson chandler? Teague will be 29 this summer, Chandler will be 30. I could think of much better ways to use our assets.

I think the idea is that if hield was a bit better at handling the ball/passing he could easily get to the hole, he already does now just has serious problems when forced to pass. We haven't really seen what malachi is capable of because in his short stint when he looked really good, he was mostly used as a shooter. I assume whatever pg we bring in in the draft should have that ability as well. Then Bogdan is likely going to be able to drive to the rim.

I don't necessarily mind resigning tyreke, but I'm really not a huge fan of his plays style. He's a bit of a ball hog and while he has flashes of brilliance he also makes some really bone head turnovers. Not to mention he comes with serious injury concerns. Either way it seems like he's playing for his next contract with another team.

Simple and plain if the team doesn't think 1 of buddy/malachi/bogdan can fill this role you're talking about, then there's absolutely no reason to have all 3 on the roster. At that point we should move Bogdan before signing him and look to go after a 3 whose younger and can handle better.
benchmobbin02
Veteran
Posts: 2,976
And1: 364
Joined: May 28, 2015
     

Re: Tyreke Evans 

Post#20 » by benchmobbin02 » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:56 pm

That is one thing that no one has really addressed. IMO in his interview Vlade alluded to potential that we could use our "assests" to build the team and culture we want. Talked about getting a look at assets Skal, WCS, Papa and Malachi. Mentioned having Bodgan coming over as another "asset". Only didn't mention Hield in that light. Interesting choice of words. Didn't say building blocks or young core.

I think that in conjunction with our picks, we could use some vets and/or young guys to further shape the roster after we get a better sense of what we have and need.
MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!

Return to Sacramento Kings