RealGM

The following choices have been made by other fan forums...

1 BOS Markelle Fultz
2 LAL Lonzo Ball
3 PHI Josh Jackson
4 PHO Jayson Tatum
5 SAC
6 ORL
7 MIN
8 NYK
9 DAL
10 SAC
11 CHA
12 DET
13 DEN
14 MIA

Fox!!!!

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app

Fox without any doubt!

Fox


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Easily Fox

Absolutely Fox


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Fox.

Fox no question. He was built for this team. With Buddy Buckets he'll find a good fit in there.

Where's our skeptic to throw some shade?

Anybody?

When was the last time we had everyone on this board agreeing on a single draft prospect?

It looks like it is an unanimous pro-Fox group here.

Fox, far and away. He would be the best player on the board and fits a big need. Could potentially be the best PG in this draft, and the other PGs have huge potential as well.

I may be a Wolf-ay, but I feeling Fox-y.

Would you guys rather end up with Tatum & Ntilikina or Fox & Anunoby/Markkanen/Justin Jackson?

I like this pool results, fans are finally on the same page, just gotta hope that he is still there with the 5th pick. If no I will be disappointed.

KF10 wrote:When was the last time we had everyone on this board agreeing on a single draft prospect?

It looks like it is an unanimous pro-Fox group here.

A little eerie

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app

City of Trees wrote:

KF10 wrote:When was the last time we had everyone on this board agreeing on a single draft prospect?

It looks like it is an unanimous pro-Fox group here.

A little eerie

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app

It's not unanimous...some jughead voted for Monk.

blind p and bleeds all haven't declared in this thread...

Too late to vote but Fox 100%

bleeds_purple wrote:Would you guys rather end up with Tatum & Ntilikina or Fox & Anunoby/Markkanen/Justin Jackson?

The latter for sure, for a few reasons:

1) I like Fox's future as a prospect much more than Tatum's. As such, I think the gap between Ntilikina and Fox is larger than the gap between Tatum and the others you have listed.

2) Having a star playmaking PG in the modern NBA is much more important than a really good scoring SF.

Okay, so two primary reasons, but still.

Am I the only one who thinks it's completely nuts that people are considering Justin Jackson at 10 just because we pick D'Aaron Fox at 5? I have him as an end of the first round talent (who I probably wouldn't even take then). He's a Junior with less impressive skills and potential than so many other prospects. I don't think it's ever a good idea to reach in a draft just to fill a position and any GM with half a brain would agree. This is especially clear since we are many years off from championship contention. We need talented players with high potential and great character. Position won't matter until we're a playoff team.