Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
Moderators: KF10, City of Trees, codydaze
Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
-
- Cold Hard Gameday Facts
- Posts: 15,519
- And1: 8,943
- Joined: Jun 15, 2008
- Location: France
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,616
- And1: 1,716
- Joined: Feb 13, 2014
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
Basketball is back, baby! I can’t wait for this.
I believe this is the game that Mason and Skal are back. Then we get Coboclo and potentially Shumpert. This could be a really fun night.
I believe this is the game that Mason and Skal are back. Then we get Coboclo and potentially Shumpert. This could be a really fun night.
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
- codydaze
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 5,864
- And1: 4,535
- Joined: Jul 06, 2013
- Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
Yup, Mason and Skal probable today. Fox out with pink eye. Who farted on his pillow?
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 863
- And1: 1,222
- Joined: Mar 25, 2012
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
you guys expect to see Bruno playing today?
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,477
- And1: 3,245
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
gutobr wrote:you guys expect to see Bruno playing today?
Maybe if we are up 20 or down 20 in the late fourth.
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,079
- And1: 1,082
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
gutobr wrote:you guys expect to see Bruno playing today?
I expect nothing and hope to be pleasantly surprised.
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 863
- And1: 1,222
- Joined: Mar 25, 2012
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
this team is not going anywhere this season. A great idea would be to get Bruno to play and tank.
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
- City of Trees
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 15,798
- And1: 5,462
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
- City of Trees
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 15,798
- And1: 5,462
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
So I missed most of the game.... Why no Bogi and Mason at the end?
Sent from my LG-H872 using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my LG-H872 using RealGM mobile app
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
- City of Trees
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 15,798
- And1: 5,462
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 815
- And1: 160
- Joined: Jul 09, 2016
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
i thought the idea of rebuilding was to get the future on the floor, not have Zac play 40 minutes and throw up 23 shots amd miss most of them
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
- ThunderBolt
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,770
- And1: 18,207
- Joined: Dec 29, 2016
- Location: Bentonville, AR
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
I think both sets of fans feel the outcome of this game was the opposite of the actual results.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,079
- And1: 1,082
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
City of Trees wrote:Buddy 18 minutes. Idk why I even post this anymore.
Sent from my LG-H872 using RealGM mobile app
I watched it over just to make sure I saw what I saw. His defense was ELITE. I had to watch him iso'd to make sure but his defense was the closest thing to lock down I've seen from a Kings player this year. Him not being in there for defense the last possession and leaving in Zbo is either brilliant tanking strategy or something that will elicit change sooner than later.
Skal also showed the staff where this train needs to head from here on.
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,079
- And1: 1,082
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: Game 58: Oklahoma City Thunder (33-26) @ Sacramento Kings (18-39) - 10:00 PM ET
Lost in LA wrote:i thought the idea of rebuilding was to get the future on the floor, not have Zac play 40 minutes and throw up 23 shots amd miss most of them
I don't get the starting lineup really. It's like the idea was to make sure Zach was the only player out there that could create for himself. Bogdan is a good player but he's not the type that goes out there and gets his and neither is Temple. They are glue types that can do a bit of everything. Jackson is a role player looking to cut and play off of others. Willie got screwed on some no calls early but he can't be relied on to carry your team. I can't complain with Zach carrying early, he was the only one capable at the start.