kingjawn100 wrote:At this point is anyone still downplaying the importance of the loss of Scott Perry? I mean, i still don't understand it. For a bit that looked like our gateway out of misery. Not stars but somehow decent free agents were interested in playing for the kings. Then we let him out of his contract with little compensation to join another team?! And now we cant get even mid level free agents to seriously consider joining the team (they are actually signing worse contracts to play elsewhere).
Vlade should have done everything possible to figure out a way for Perry to get a major raise/job title upgrade for him to stay. And honestly Vivek should have looked at the situation and said "who would i have more confidence in running this organization...Vlade or Perry?" and then promptly fired or re-assigned vlade.
The Kings are a team that will NEVER lure good free agents without having someone with credibility in the organization. For the first time in as long as i can remember we had that guy....then let him go! Inexcusable
I tend to agree here but Vlade and Perry didn’t appear to be on the same page. Hill was told we were looking to win now then he was put on the bench. That stuff just adds to the Kings reputation of dysfunction.
I think we have 3 solid players in Bogdan, Boogie and Giles. Fox, Jackson, Bagley and Mason are all maybes. They have to show real improvement this year. They have athletic ability to do so but sometimes that ability isn’t enough. It’s most critical for the second year guys: Fox, Jackson and Mason.
If they do improve the Kings will have a good base to sell and Vlade’s reputation will rise.
If they don’t improve it will be imperative and harder to sign free agents. The Kings should have a contingency plan in place to move quickly if they don’t think Vlade can be trusted to sign free agents next summer in this environment.