Page 1 of 1

Fanbase Rookie Approval Rating: Marvin Bagley

Posted: Sun Dec 9, 2018 5:26 pm
by EvanZ
Hey so I'm embarking on a litte project to compile fanbase approval ratings for the rookies your team drafted (or traded for on Draft night). Very simple poll like a Presidential approval. Use whatever subjective or objective criteria you feel is necessary to decide.

Re: Fanbase Rookie Approval Rating: Marvin Bagley

Posted: Sun Dec 9, 2018 8:31 pm
by SacKingZZZ
I approve. I don't think the Kings could have gone wrong with where they were. Ayton, Doncic, or Bagley are all nice gets for a team that shouldn't have been in the position to nab any one of them.

Re: Fanbase Rookie Approval Rating: Marvin Bagley

Posted: Sun Dec 9, 2018 8:58 pm
by Lost in LA
Preferred Doncic at the time, but Bagley could allow us to to trade WCS and thus might be better in the long run.

Re: Fanbase Rookie Approval Rating: Marvin Bagley

Posted: Sun Dec 9, 2018 9:07 pm
by KF10
Always had Doncic #1 during the last draft season and he is still my #1.

That being said, Bagley is raw as hell but still putting up solid numbers. I think he has really good potential. His fit with Fox, Bogdan & Hield is excellent. You can argue Doncic may have taken the ball away from Fox & Bogdan but all of this is speculation. Who knows.

Doncic is obviously the best player in the draft but Bagley isn't some bum either.

I approve but if I had another attempt of this draft, I take Doncic.

Re: Fanbase Rookie Approval Rating: Marvin Bagley

Posted: Sun Dec 9, 2018 10:27 pm
by BoogieTime
Surprised at poll

At this point the pick will relieve Vlade of his services. Not only could Luka be a generational type, but I’d have Bagley below the likes of JJJ/Carter

Re: Fanbase Rookie Approval Rating: Marvin Bagley

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 6:10 am
by OGSactownballer
I said yes but there should be a @with qualification” spot.
Obviously I wanted Luka and I would still take him 100 out of 100 times over Marvin.
I do believe that Marvin is also a special player. The problem is that bigs that are special in the current mode are actually becoming more and more common. But players with the “it” that Luka has only come along once in a while.
He makes EVERYONE around him better.

Re: Fanbase Rookie Approval Rating: Marvin Bagley

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 9:26 pm
by BoogieTime
OGSactownballer wrote:I said yes but there should be a @with qualification” spot.
Obviously I wanted Luka and I would still take him 100 out of 100 times over Marvin.
I do believe that Marvin is also a special player. The problem is that bigs that are special in the current mode are actually becoming more and more common. But players with the “it” that Luka has only come along once in a while.
He makes EVERYONE around him better.

I think that qualifies as a disapprove man

Re: Fanbase Rookie Approval Rating: Marvin Bagley

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 7:11 pm
by pillwenney
My answer changes depending on which specific question you're asking (the poll question is different from the post question).

Do I approve of the pick? Still no. Fox and Luka could have been an incredible combination.

Do I approve of Bagley as a rookie and a future piece worth holding onto and investing resources in? Absolutely. He'll still be very, very good.

Re: Fanbase Rookie Approval Rating: Marvin Bagley

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 10:59 pm
by TacoBell
I like him a lot. You can tell by watching him play that he has the potential to do many things very well, not just a lob catching rim runnber big like willie but a guy that can stretch the floor, block shots, pick and roll, finish at the rim, isolate 1 on 1 and hustle as hard as anyone. He's super raw and young but he has the potential to be an Anthony Davis type player if he has the will to improve.

Re: Fanbase Rookie Approval Rating: Marvin Bagley

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:08 am
by blind prophet
Not sure.

Went from being really disappointed, to unsure.

Re: Fanbase Rookie Approval Rating: Marvin Bagley

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:41 am
by BoogieTime
SOunds like Joerger voted with a burner account on the disappointed

If that sound bite was intended it was a goof