BoogieTime wrote:Holiday is a pretty useless player, I'd be surprised if he carried much value, but sure
How are you coming to this conclusion? He’s always been a solid shooter and defender.
Moderators: KF10, City of Trees, codydaze
BoogieTime wrote:Holiday is a pretty useless player, I'd be surprised if he carried much value, but sure
sackings916 wrote:BoogieTime wrote:Holiday is a pretty useless player, I'd be surprised if he carried much value, but sure
How are you coming to this conclusion? He’s always been a solid shooter and defender.
BoogieTime wrote:sackings916 wrote:BoogieTime wrote:Holiday is a pretty useless player, I'd be surprised if he carried much value, but sure
How are you coming to this conclusion? He’s always been a solid shooter and defender.
Having the displeasure of watching him here. I'd take someone absorbing him into their space, but as I said I'd love to move him for value in a perfect world
sackings916 wrote:BoogieTime wrote:sackings916 wrote:
How are you coming to this conclusion? He’s always been a solid shooter and defender.
Having the displeasure of watching him here. I'd take someone absorbing him into their space, but as I said I'd love to move him for value in a perfect world
25 game sample size isn’t sufficient to say Holiday is a useless player. Especially after a midseason trade and having to adjust to a new team, system, city, etc
OxAndFox wrote:sackings916 wrote:BoogieTime wrote:
Having the displeasure of watching him here. I'd take someone absorbing him into their space, but as I said I'd love to move him for value in a perfect world
25 game sample size isn’t sufficient to say Holiday is a useless player. Especially after a midseason trade and having to adjust to a new team, system, city, etc
The biggest factor was coaching when he got here. There was none.
So, wait until next season after we signed Brown so there is sure to be...ummm...oh crap.
sackings916 wrote:OxAndFox wrote:sackings916 wrote:
25 game sample size isn’t sufficient to say Holiday is a useless player. Especially after a midseason trade and having to adjust to a new team, system, city, etc
The biggest factor was coaching when he got here. There was none.
So, wait until next season after we signed Brown so there is sure to be...ummm...oh crap.
I think the biggest factor was he just went thru a cold stretch. Basketball and especially shooting is high variance, I think it was likely with a bigger sample size he would’ve regressed back to his normal 37-40% from 3 which was where he was at the last few years.
Rockets
Traded • Thomas Robinson to Blazers for • rights to Kostas Papanikolaou • rights to Marko Todorovic • 2015 second round pick (less favorable of Nuggets, Timberwolves) (#37-Richaun Holmes) • 2017 second round pick (#45-Dillon Brooks) on 2013-07-10
ArizonaKnicks wrote:It's probably been posted- I wanted to see Kings fans reaction for moving the #4 pick to the Knicks on draft night.
Does Immanuel Quickley, Pick #11, Dallas 2023 1st, and a protect future Knicks 1st for the 4th pick engage you guys at all?
Is there any salary dump opportunities, that the Kings might want to look into as well?
Madd Squabbles wrote:I have a trade proposal for you guys. I'm wondering if you would do this trade. And if not, what would it realistically take (even though this is the most that I would give up just to move up 4 spots)
Pelicans get:
SAC #4
Kings get:
Pels #8
2 Future FRPs (next year Pels have the option of swapping with the Lakers but I would top 5 protect this pick)
Jaxson Hayes (former lottery pick, 6'11" athletic power forward that has 3-point range but is on expiring contract)
RipPizzaGuy wrote:Madd Squabbles wrote:I have a trade proposal for you guys. I'm wondering if you would do this trade. And if not, what would it realistically take (even though this is the most that I would give up just to move up 4 spots)
Pelicans get:
SAC #4
Kings get:
Pels #8
2 Future FRPs (next year Pels have the option of swapping with the Lakers but I would top 5 protect this pick)
Jaxson Hayes (former lottery pick, 6'11" athletic power forward that has 3-point range but is on expiring contract)
Not interested in any type of deal like this.
Hayes has no role in Sacramento, and just got 3 years probation. He is negative value to us. And we aren't in a place to push the 4th overall pick down the road for future value.
Madd Squabbles wrote:RipPizzaGuy wrote:Madd Squabbles wrote:I have a trade proposal for you guys. I'm wondering if you would do this trade. And if not, what would it realistically take (even though this is the most that I would give up just to move up 4 spots)
Pelicans get:
SAC #4
Kings get:
Pels #8
2 Future FRPs (next year Pels have the option of swapping with the Lakers but I would top 5 protect this pick)
Jaxson Hayes (former lottery pick, 6'11" athletic power forward that has 3-point range but is on expiring contract)
Not interested in any type of deal like this.
Hayes has no role in Sacramento, and just got 3 years probation. He is negative value to us. And we aren't in a place to push the 4th overall pick down the road for future value.
Do you have a counter that's reasonably based on reality?
RipPizzaGuy wrote:Madd Squabbles wrote:RipPizzaGuy wrote:
Not interested in any type of deal like this.
Hayes has no role in Sacramento, and just got 3 years probation. He is negative value to us. And we aren't in a place to push the 4th overall pick down the road for future value.
Do you have a counter that's reasonably based on reality?
Aside from Ingram/Zion which are obviously not realistic, there isn't much from the Pelicans I like aside from Murphy and Herb Jones.
Jones was a realgm darling last year, and some Kings fans like the idea of Jones + 8 for #4. I'm not a huge fan of that. I like Jones, seems like an awesome role player type, can possibly become similar to what DFS is in Dallas. I think the Kings need a higher upside guy than that if we are moving #4.
I'm just not seeing the 2 teams as a good fit. Both are trying to win.
Madd Squabbles wrote:RipPizzaGuy wrote:Madd Squabbles wrote:
Do you have a counter that's reasonably based on reality?
Aside from Ingram/Zion which are obviously not realistic, there isn't much from the Pelicans I like aside from Murphy and Herb Jones.
Jones was a realgm darling last year, and some Kings fans like the idea of Jones + 8 for #4. I'm not a huge fan of that. I like Jones, seems like an awesome role player type, can possibly become similar to what DFS is in Dallas. I think the Kings need a higher upside guy than that if we are moving #4.
I'm just not seeing the 2 teams as a good fit. Both are trying to win.
Wow! Not even Trey Murphy and/or Herb Jones and no amount of future FRPs could convince you to move down 4 spots!?! You drive a tough bargain.
Looks like we would not be able to hammer out a deal here. I don't believe the Pels would trade Herb Jones in this trade. He is too much of a fan favorite. Possibly Trey Murphy but I wouldn't trade him either, to be honest.
RipPizzaGuy wrote:Madd Squabbles wrote:RipPizzaGuy wrote:
Aside from Ingram/Zion which are obviously not realistic, there isn't much from the Pelicans I like aside from Murphy and Herb Jones.
Jones was a realgm darling last year, and some Kings fans like the idea of Jones + 8 for #4. I'm not a huge fan of that. I like Jones, seems like an awesome role player type, can possibly become similar to what DFS is in Dallas. I think the Kings need a higher upside guy than that if we are moving #4.
I'm just not seeing the 2 teams as a good fit. Both are trying to win.
Wow! Not even Trey Murphy and/or Herb Jones and no amount of future FRPs could convince you to move down 4 spots!?! You drive a tough bargain.
Looks like we would not be able to hammer out a deal here. I don't believe the Pels would trade Herb Jones in this trade. He is too much of a fan favorite. Possibly Trey Murphy but I wouldn't trade him either, to be honest.
Well that's kind of the point.
Sure I would take Herb + Murphy + 8 for #4 + Holiday. The value is great. But I don't think the Pelicans should/would do that, which is why I don't see it as a good fit.
Kings should either draft at #4
trade down to 5 or 6 at the latest
trade the pick entirely + more if a guy like Donovan Mitchell becomes available
trading down to 7-12 with future 1sts does not fit the direction of this team. They want to make the playoffs next year, regardless if it looks realistic or not that is the teams goal.
vtime wrote:Would you guys take Kuzma and #10 for the 4 pick? Would that get you in the playoffs?
Ham says the two teams were close to a deal for Collins at the deadline, but in the end ATL backed off. My guess is Barnes + a future protected 1st.codydaze wrote:Shams reporting Mcnair has been looking at a trade for John Collins that doesn't include the 4 pick. I wonder what that package would look like?