Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
Moderators: KF10, City of Trees, codydaze
Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
-
- Cold Hard Gameday Facts
- Posts: 15,519
- And1: 8,943
- Joined: Jun 15, 2008
- Location: France
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,907
- And1: 10,574
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
Surprised Fox is sitting again.
I wonder if Monte and Gentry are on the same page with the tank, and just keeping Vivek happy by saying "ya we are looking for the deal"
I wonder if Monte and Gentry are on the same page with the tank, and just keeping Vivek happy by saying "ya we are looking for the deal"
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
- City of Trees
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 15,798
- And1: 5,462
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
Ham was on 1320 earlier and he says Fox isn't sitting for the tank or trade deadline. They want him to play, Fox warms up and says he can't go. No MRI's are scheduled or have been done. It's 100% Fox saying he isn't playing because his ankle is sore.RipPizzaGuy wrote:Surprised Fox is sitting again.
I wonder if Monte and Gentry are on the same page with the tank, and just keeping Vivek happy by saying "ya we are looking for the deal"
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,282
- And1: 2,775
- Joined: Feb 09, 2017
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
Really hope Barnes and Holmes are on different teams after the deadline.. all the vets
But we may have a poor owner needing to sell tickets keeping what talent he can (hope not)
But we may have a poor owner needing to sell tickets keeping what talent he can (hope not)
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,282
- And1: 2,775
- Joined: Feb 09, 2017
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
City of Trees wrote:Ham was on 1320 earlier and he says Fox isn't sitting for the tank or trade deadline. They want him to play, Fox warms up and says he can't go. No MRI's are scheduled or have been done. It's 100% Fox saying he isn't playing because his ankle is sore.RipPizzaGuy wrote:Surprised Fox is sitting again.
I wonder if Monte and Gentry are on the same page with the tank, and just keeping Vivek happy by saying "ya we are looking for the deal"
Its odd timing that the soreness is coming leading to the deadline, almost like a don't trade me sign
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,907
- And1: 10,574
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
City of Trees wrote:Ham was on 1320 earlier and he says Fox isn't sitting for the tank or trade deadline. They want him to play, Fox warms up and says he can't go. No MRI's are scheduled or have been done. It's 100% Fox saying he isn't playing because his ankle is sore.RipPizzaGuy wrote:Surprised Fox is sitting again.
I wonder if Monte and Gentry are on the same page with the tank, and just keeping Vivek happy by saying "ya we are looking for the deal"
Thanks for the info. Probably been hurt more than hes led on.
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
- City of Trees
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 15,798
- And1: 5,462
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
No problem. I should share Ham almost came off as someone who doesn't believe Fox has a bad ankle. Multiple times he said Fox is telling the team he's not playing.RipPizzaGuy wrote:City of Trees wrote:Ham was on 1320 earlier and he says Fox isn't sitting for the tank or trade deadline. They want him to play, Fox warms up and says he can't go. No MRI's are scheduled or have been done. It's 100% Fox saying he isn't playing because his ankle is sore.RipPizzaGuy wrote:Surprised Fox is sitting again.
I wonder if Monte and Gentry are on the same page with the tank, and just keeping Vivek happy by saying "ya we are looking for the deal"
Thanks for the info. Probably been hurt more than hes led on.
It's weird because your star player has now missed five games due to injury and the medical staff hasn't even ordered tests to evaluate the severity
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,907
- And1: 10,574
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
City of Trees wrote:No problem. I should share Ham almost came off as someone who doesn't believe Fox has a bad ankle. Multiple times he said Fox is telling the team he's not playing.RipPizzaGuy wrote:City of Trees wrote:Ham was on 1320 earlier and he says Fox isn't sitting for the tank or trade deadline. They want him to play, Fox warms up and says he can't go. No MRI's are scheduled or have been done. It's 100% Fox saying he isn't playing because his ankle is sore.
Thanks for the info. Probably been hurt more than hes led on.
It's weird because your star player has now missed five games due to injury and the medical staff hasn't even ordered tests to evaluate the severity
Weird. Fox must be as checked out as I am on this team. Couldn't give a damn anymore. 6 games losing streak, currently slated for the 5th pick, and they are talking about trading for Jerami Grant. I've decided that if they want to be insane, I won't go there with them.
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,464
- And1: 1,348
- Joined: Jul 23, 2004
- Location: Office
- Contact:
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
RipPizzaGuy wrote:City of Trees wrote:No problem. I should share Ham almost came off as someone who doesn't believe Fox has a bad ankle. Multiple times he said Fox is telling the team he's not playing.RipPizzaGuy wrote:
Thanks for the info. Probably been hurt more than hes led on.
It's weird because your star player has now missed five games due to injury and the medical staff hasn't even ordered tests to evaluate the severity
Weird. Fox must be as checked out as I am on this team. Couldn't give a damn anymore. 6 games losing streak, currently slated for the 5th pick, and they are talking about trading for Jerami Grant. I've decided that if they want to be insane, I won't go there with them.
I don't think you can blame him.
With him missing it magnifies what he does on this team. His scoring is huge, so if the Kings are going to trade him, they need to think about who is going to score the ball.
Sacramento Kings
Sydney Kings
Sydney Kings
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,771
- And1: 7,454
- Joined: Nov 24, 2006
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
RipPizzaGuy wrote:Surprised Fox is sitting again.
I wonder if Monte and Gentry are on the same page with the tank, and just keeping Vivek happy by saying "ya we are looking for the deal"
The 5D chess way of looking at this for McNair is: leak every call you make to make everyone (including the delusional owner) think you're being active, trade vets, and tell everyone who'll listen after the deadline that you tried to make a move but it compromised long term goals.
Result: no one wants you fired since you were "active", but the team still gets to that rebuild--10+ years too late, but who's counting?
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,225
- And1: 401
- Joined: Jan 01, 2007
- Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
What are we doing here
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,771
- And1: 7,454
- Joined: Nov 24, 2006
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
jeffjtk1234 wrote:What are we doing here
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Stealth tank.
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,907
- And1: 10,574
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
rpa wrote:RipPizzaGuy wrote:Surprised Fox is sitting again.
I wonder if Monte and Gentry are on the same page with the tank, and just keeping Vivek happy by saying "ya we are looking for the deal"
The 5D chess way of looking at this for McNair is: leak every call you make to make everyone (including the delusional owner) think you're being active, trade vets, and tell everyone who'll listen after the deadline that you tried to make a move but it compromised long term goals.
Result: no one wants you fired since you were "active", but the team still gets to that rebuild--10+ years too late, but who's counting?
We can only hope Monte is capable of pulling something like this off.
So far we have heard Simmons, Grant, Sabonis, Turner, Collins.. So pretty much every rumored big name?
I hope Monte's calls are - we will trade any combo of Barnes, Bagley, Holmes, Harkless, Len, Tristan, Buddy, 2nds. Picks and young players off the table. If one of those teams decides to be stupid then why not.
We have 5 very losable games before the deadline, and the 1 winnable one is vs OKC who always beats us. Could be sitting at 18-40 here pretty soon. I imagine Vivek will still be saying we think we can rally and make the 10th seed at that point
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,771
- And1: 7,454
- Joined: Nov 24, 2006
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
RipPizzaGuy wrote:We have 5 very losable games before the deadline, and the 1 winnable one is vs OKC who always beats us. Could be sitting at 18-40 here pretty soon. I imagine Vivek will still be saying we think we can rally and make the 10th seed at that point
We all see it coming.
Blazers (10th seed) on pace for 34 wins. We'd need 35 to make the 10th seed. 18-40 would mean going 17-7 over the final quarter of the season. That just isn't happening.
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,907
- And1: 10,574
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
Re: Game 52 Thread - Kings (18-33) @ Knicks (23-27)
rpa wrote:RipPizzaGuy wrote:We have 5 very losable games before the deadline, and the 1 winnable one is vs OKC who always beats us. Could be sitting at 18-40 here pretty soon. I imagine Vivek will still be saying we think we can rally and make the 10th seed at that point
We all see it coming.
Blazers (10th seed) on pace for 34 wins. We'd need 35 to make the 10th seed. 18-40 would mean going 17-7 over the final quarter of the season. That just isn't happening.
But it doesn't mean that we can't somehow magically hit 31 wins and find ourselves with another 10th pick! Yay!