RealGM

We are finally here. Put yourself out there and share what you think the Kings should do. Share your vote.

I voted for Ivey

I voted Ivey as well. Not sure what we can get the value. It would be fitting we pass on him and he is the next big star

Like I said in the other thread my order is

1. Ivey
2. Mathurin
3. Murray

Ivey has the most star potential and upside at 4. He has to be the pick.

Voted Ivey. I would be fine with trading out for a star, but don't see any available.

Ranked
1. Ivey = use 4 for big trade for star (I.e. Donovan Mitchell)
2. Trade back

Those are really the only options here. If McNair picks Keegan or Sharpe at 4, it’s a failure.

kalenclayton wrote:Ranked
1. Ivey = use 4 for big trade for star (I.e. Donovan Mitchell)
2. Trade back

Those are really the only options here. If McNair picks Keegan or Sharpe at 4, it’s a failure.

I agree it could be perceived as an initial failure but a few things to this point..

We really don't know how Detroit analyzes the draft? They could actually favor Murray>Ivey. Additionally Murray could end up being a great player that helps Sac get to the playoffs and/or Ivey flames out. Hard for me to call it a failure this early, its not like Ivey is a Luka level prospect.

kalenclayton wrote:Ranked
1. Ivey = use 4 for big trade for star (I.e. Donovan Mitchell)
2. Trade back

Those are really the only options here. If McNair picks Keegan or Sharpe at 4, it’s a failure.

It'd be a little soon, but I'd feel like it was a failure personally. I'd be fine with Murray if we weren't drafting 4th. He's a good prospect and a high floor, but Ivey is one of the 4 players in this draft that have superstar potential. Making safe plays isn't going to get this team to the playoffs, they need to be aggressive.

RipPizzaGuy wrote:

kalenclayton wrote:Ranked
1. Ivey = use 4 for big trade for star (I.e. Donovan Mitchell)
2. Trade back

Those are really the only options here. If McNair picks Keegan or Sharpe at 4, it’s a failure.

I agree it could be perceived as an initial failure but a few things to this point..

We really don't know how Detroit analyzes the draft? They could actually favor Murray>Ivey. Additionally Murray could end up being a great player that helps Sac get to the playoffs and/or Ivey flames out. Hard for me to call it a failure this early, its not like Ivey is a Luka level prospect.

I feel you. We really don’t know how they perceive it, but there seems to be a lot of smoke around Murray to DET at 5. I don’t see a Bagley-Luka disparity, but I do see quite a big difference between the two. I’m really high on Ivey though.

CraftylikeaFox wrote:

kalenclayton wrote:Ranked
1. Ivey = use 4 for big trade for star (I.e. Donovan Mitchell)
2. Trade back

Those are really the only options here. If McNair picks Keegan or Sharpe at 4, it’s a failure.

It'd be a little soon, but I'd feel like it was a failure personally. I'd be fine with Murray if we weren't drafting 4th. He's a good prospect and a high floor, but Ivey is one of the 4 players in this draft that have superstar potential. Making safe plays isn't going to get this team to the playoffs, they need to be aggressive.

I really like Murray the player and I think he fits with the Kings really well. I just have Ivey as a clearly better player, one who could raise the ceiling in Sac.

I'm going with Murray just because I don't share the evaluation of Ivey as being a tier above Murray. I'm just not as high on him and I think Murray is going to be great in his role at a premium position in the NBA. I think if we trade down past Detroit then they take him at 5 too so I'd just take my guy at 4.

I'm with Ivey. To be fair, I don't think he will be there at #4 though.

If the Kings still have their 4th pick, draft Murray.

I'm still on the Murray train because I think he is BPA at 4.

I prefer them to trade down and obtain win-now pieces since there is a mandate from above to make the playoffs.

If the Kings manage to nab Collins without giving up the 4, that would be ideal. Use the 4 to trade down for win now pieces. Now, the team looks a quite a bit competitive.

Is this what you want the Kings to do or what they will do? I feel the direction of the team is still looking at trades, for stars or for multiple quality starters, than Keegan. I think if no trades present themselves, they would feel more comfortable with Keegan's floor and SG not being one of the most needed positions on the team (with DDV or Davion)

BoogieTime wrote:Is this what you want the Kings to do or what they will do? I

What you think they should do

City of Trees wrote:

BoogieTime wrote:Is this what you want the Kings to do or what they will do? I

What you think they should do

Well if they come out of this with a couple of starters I will be as mad as a Pistons fan after a Grant trade.

Still can't make up my mind.

blind prophet wrote:Still can't make up my mind.

I think I chose a 24 hr poll. You have until around 10am if you want to cast a vote.

Today's the day. Just read banchero is now Vegas choice to go #1. Please let Chet or Jabari fall to us lol

Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app

i was for trading down, but now i just want them to draft ivey

Felt like I was on the clock with poll expiring.

Ivey