Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- codydaze
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 6,469
- And1: 5,024
- Joined: Jul 06, 2013
- Location: Sacramento, CA
-
Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Jayson Tatum and Al Horford are both out for a Celtics team that is on the second night of a back to back following an OT loss to the Warriors. We should look to capitalize on their tired legs and really push the pace tonight.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- City of Trees
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 15,851
- And1: 5,511
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Is Monk out?
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- City of Trees
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 15,851
- And1: 5,511
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Nvm I see he is available.
Let's get this W
Let's get this W
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,574
- And1: 3,306
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
A little late to the game.
Looks like Vegas had us favored by 3.5
A little surprised by that.
Agreed on those tired legs & no Tatum, lets take advantage of this.
Looks like Vegas had us favored by 3.5
A little surprised by that.
Agreed on those tired legs & no Tatum, lets take advantage of this.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,574
- And1: 3,306
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Wow did Fox summon his inner Curry with that bomb?
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- codydaze
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 6,469
- And1: 5,024
- Joined: Jul 06, 2013
- Location: Sacramento, CA
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
De'Aaron Fox = good at basketball
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,574
- And1: 3,306
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Good timeout by Brown. Too many 3's. Sabonis had his man sealed off pretty much under the hoop Ellis just looked at him.
Stuff like that is bs. Used to make me angry too when I played when the guards ignore bigs in good position.
Stuff like that is bs. Used to make me angry too when I played when the guards ignore bigs in good position.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- codydaze
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 6,469
- And1: 5,024
- Joined: Jul 06, 2013
- Location: Sacramento, CA
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Fox after Keegan beat his career high.


Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,574
- And1: 3,306
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
codydaze wrote:Fox after Keegan beat his career high.
Just said something to my wife about him breaking Keegan's tonight.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,574
- And1: 3,306
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Bs 1 call for tonight on Lyles.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- City of Trees
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 15,851
- And1: 5,511
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Crazy shooting right now
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,574
- And1: 3,306
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
No call on Barnes, bad call #2
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,574
- And1: 3,306
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
When Fox intentionally fouled a minute ago I was wondering if he'd pick up another one quickly. But this is the sort of challenge Brown should use early when he decides to do so.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- codydaze
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 6,469
- And1: 5,024
- Joined: Jul 06, 2013
- Location: Sacramento, CA
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
City of Trees wrote:Crazy shooting right now
Both teams combined are shooting 52% from three. Just crazy.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- codydaze
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 6,469
- And1: 5,024
- Joined: Jul 06, 2013
- Location: Sacramento, CA
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
We really need to stop wasting challenges in the first half.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,574
- And1: 3,306
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
How that wasn't delay of game I have no idea.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,574
- And1: 3,306
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
Over the back on Fox, no call Boston gets another possession.
Starting to get annoyed.
Starting to get annoyed.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- codydaze
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 6,469
- And1: 5,024
- Joined: Jul 06, 2013
- Location: Sacramento, CA
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
blind prophet wrote:Over the back on Fox, no call Boston gets another possession.
Starting to get annoyed.
Yeah that was a terrible no call. Totally knocked Fox upside the head.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,574
- And1: 3,306
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
codydaze wrote:We really need to stop wasting challenges in the first half.
In hindsight with a little thought, if that was the third foul on Fox then it would of been ok to gamble. But not on his second foul.
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,574
- And1: 3,306
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
-
Re: Kings (16-9) vs Celtics (20-6)
I'm going to listen to most of the third on the patio with G man.
Keep an eye on those refs we only shot 2 FT's in the first half.
Keep an eye on those refs we only shot 2 FT's in the first half.