Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:13 am
Cisco looked scared when Oneal confronted him lol
RealGM
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
Indiana (16-21) at Sacramento (14-20)
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=749473
Page 3 of 3
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:17 am
Its looking like its done. Salmons needs to come up big. He hasn't been hear all night
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:19 am
Yeah, we've just been flat and careless all night long...no urgency to win.
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:26 am
Martin was perfect all night...until when it mattered most.
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:28 am
At least it's good to see Martin back and playing great.
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:30 am
I haven't been this angry about a game in a while. There were just so many things from top to bottom that were done wrong tonight. We waited to long to play small ball, didn't get it to Kevin enough until the end, and probably most costly--we crashed on Jermaine waaaayyy too much. Brad was doing just fine with him, but we still treated him like he was Duncan all night long and it left there shooters much more open then they should have been.
Oh, and there were also the turnovers.
Oh, and there were also the turnovers.
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:31 am
Not a surprising loss with how uninspired we played tonight. Just not a good effort at all.
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:37 am
I'm glad that Martin played a great game.
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:41 am
joeyyowee wrote:I'm glad that Martin played a great game.
You better be glad. You're the one who jinxed him after all.
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:52 am
mitchweber wrote:I haven't been this angry about a game in a while. There were just so many things from top to bottom that were done wrong tonight. We waited to long to play small ball, didn't get it to Kevin enough until the end, and probably most costly--we crashed on Jermaine waaaayyy too much. Brad was doing just fine with him, but we still treated him like he was Duncan all night long and it left there shooters much more open then they should have been.
Oh, and there were also the turnovers.
doesn't help in this case, which is why I myself do not like the idea of changing the style play. because you
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:54 am
a-rod wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
doesn't help in this case, which is why I myself do not like the idea of changing the style play. because you
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:29 am
Ballings7 wrote:I think I'll just go with Indiana, just seems to me they'll be too focused for this game (after the last two games) and are some better than us.
And so it went. Still a good effort in the 2nd half, though. I actually thought Garcia wasn't scared when he and JO were facing eachother.
Brad's rebounding and defense was good. As a whole, quite happy about Brad's rebounding being back.
Kevin was impressive in his return. I do think he got a bit tired late, but don't think that in and out shot was because of that. Just didn't go down.
Travis Diener going off like that was pretty surprising. Not because he doesn't have game, but how much he did go off. He's in the league because of his shooting and adequate play-making/ball-handling skill. Showed flashes of that with the Magic.
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:32 am
Well, you should never win a game if you turn the ball over like that. It just wouldn't be right.
And the minute crunching begins. Tonight it was our young bigs. In time we may have the smallest statured rotation in the league.
And the minute crunching begins. Tonight it was our young bigs. In time we may have the smallest statured rotation in the league.