Page 1 of 1
C-Webb A Warrior by Tuesday?
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:28 pm
by Rugged Ron Ron
At least he's not a Laker, that's all I care. Why he didnt just resign with Detroit if you want a ring so much?
Re: C-Webb A Warrior by Tuesday?
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:30 pm
by Smills91
Rugged Ron Ron wrote:At least he's not a Laker, that's all I care. Why he didnt just resign with Detroit if you want a ring so much?
That's like saying, whew, it's only HIV diesease not cruetzfelt-jakob's disease.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:47 pm
by Bac2Basics
If C-Webb was smart, he'd be in the Celtic's ear until they filed a restraining order.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:23 am
by SacTown Kings
I'm glad Webber signed with the Warriors, we might actually have a chance to catch them now. Webber will ruin that team. He is but a shell of his former self, only thing is he still thinks he is an elite player. Webber has never really leanred how to be a role player (even in Detroit things were not always as good as they seemed on the outside). Webber burned Nellie once and he will do it again.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:01 am
by a-rod
^I think Mitch_Richmond is The greatest Sacramento Kings ever,
but lets face it Webber is the one to put the Sacramento Kings on the map, so lets not start trashing him, and Lets just remember the good times we had with him.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:29 am
by SacTown Kings
a-rod wrote:^I think Mitch_Richmond is The greatest Sacramento Kings ever,
but lets face it Webber is the one to put the Sacramento Kings on the map, so lets not start trashing him, and Lets just remember the good times we had with him.
I am just stating my opinion. Webber was my favorite player and I am grateful for what he did in Sacramento. However, I am not blind to the fact that he does have an ego and he has never really adjusted well to being more of a role player. Those are just facts, if facts are trashing someone then so be it. I think Nellie is out of his mind to sign Webber, but I think it is good news for us. I guess we shall see.
This isn't about what Webber accomplished in Sacramento, it is about what Webber is doing currently.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:04 am
by BMiller52
Good luck to Chris and the Warriors, at least it's not the Lakers. I can't really understand why you all hate the W's so much. I don't really like them as a potential other favorite team(like I like the Pistons as one of my favorite teams besides the Kings who are always #1 for example) but I can't understand the hate for them. They're fun to watch, we've never played them in the playoffs, and yeah they might be the other team in NorCal but who cares?
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:27 am
by Rugged Ron Ron
BMiller52 wrote:Good luck to Chris and the Warriors, at least it's not the Lakers. I can't really understand why you all hate the W's so much. I don't really like them as a potential other favorite team(like I like the Pistons as one of my favorite teams besides the Kings who are always #1 for example) but I can't understand the hate for them. They're fun to watch, we've never played them in the playoffs, and yeah they might be the other team in NorCal but who cares?
I dont think people hate the W's, other than Smills of course. But doesn't he hates every teams except the Kings? There are no rivalry between the two teams. Maybe between the internet fans but that's it. If anything, SAC/GSW/LAC should be hating on the Lakers.
Anyway, Im glad he is back in the West. More chances to see him play.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:14 am
by SacKingZZZ
Good luck to C-Webb and the W's! I really don't get this move for Chris though. I wouldn' rank the Warriors as a title contender, I guess none of the contenders wanted him?
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 7:38 am
by Ballings7
I don't like the move overall for both sides... main thing being is the Warriors are not a title contender. Chris does get to be close to home, though.
Should of went to Detroit or Boston.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:45 am
by pillwenney
Yeah I don't really care. We're really not rivals with them at all outside of RealGM. The decision itself certainly is weird for both sides, but still, I wish Chris the best of luck.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:52 pm
by Smills91
Rugged Ron Ron wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I dont think people hate the W's, other than Smills of course. But doesn't he hates every teams except the Kings? There are no rivalry between the two teams. Maybe between the internet fans but that's it. If anything, SAC/GSW/LAC should be hating on the Lakers.
Anyway, Im glad he is back in the West. More chances to see him play.
No I got my list of teams I hate the most:
1) Lakers
2) Warriors
3) Jazz
3.5) Knicks
Other than that, I'm pretty indifferent to other teams when it doesn't concern the Kings.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:55 pm
by RoyalCourtJestr
I only hate one team - the Lakers. I don't hate anyone else, really. I don't much care for the Spurs or Mavs. I'd cheer for quite a few teams over others, of course, (when the Kings aren't playing obviously.) I cheered for GS when they played Mavs last year.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:11 am
by kevin44
Webber should have tried for the Celtics, but being a huge Webber fan I am just glad he is back in the NBA. The Kings owe Webber a lot. I think he will help the W's a lot with limited action. I never thought the Kings would be this bad and the W's would be this good.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:53 am
by ethiosew
I'm just glad he didn't join the Lakers or the Mavs. I'll be rooting for the team across the bay and CWEBB, favorite player of all time.