Page 1 of 1
Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:28 am
by ICMTM
Now you know I've worked too many hours....
Re: Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:42 am
by RIPskaterdude
Ack! We're supposed to be depressed towards the outcome of the game, THEN we get a win (see Lakers game)! Now you've cursed us!
Anyways, I figure that we will lose by 8-14, because the Spurs are a very 3 point dependent team and....we suck at defending it.
Re: Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:53 am
by KingInExile
This thread has already had more replies than my last game thread.
Re: Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:09 am
by RIPskaterdude
Only the Kings could allow the Spurs to score 33 in one quarter
Re: Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:25 am
by SacKingZZZ
WTF is going on with Spencer and Brad did they get traded during a timeout or something?? These rotations are rediculous, you can't sit you starters for this long whether your trying to win or not.
Re: Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:32 am
by RIPskaterdude
Have the Spurs ever shot such a high % before?
Re: Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:38 am
by KingInExile
Uh...ok...we suck.
Re: Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:42 am
by RIPskaterdude
I think I'm going to get drunk. Seems more productive than watching the rest of the game.
Re: Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 3:33 am
by Blame Rasho
KingInExile wrote:Uh...ok...we suck.
Well most team suck without their best and most productive player...
Re: Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 3:45 am
by KingInExile
Blame Rasho wrote:KingInExile wrote:Uh...ok...we suck.
Well most team suck without their best and most productive player...
We would suck just as bad even if Martin wasn't injured (assuming you were talking about Martin's injury and not Kenny Thomas').
Re: Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 6:28 am
by BMiller52
This team injures my eyes, srsly
Re: Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:15 pm
by ICMTM
Maybe Ron Artest was that good? Kevin missed time last year, too and we were almost a .500 team Sorry KIE, but my game thread titles have a tabloid style to them. I think I was high when I said 28 wins this year. I'm going to lower that to 23.
Re: Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 7:30 pm
by RIPskaterdude
ICMTM wrote:Maybe Ron Artest was that good? Kevin missed time last year, too and we were almost a .500 team Sorry KIE, but my game thread titles have a tabloid style to them. I think I was high when I said 28 wins this year. I'm going to lower that to 23.
23? Are you sure you arent still high? I'm thinking 20 or lower.
Re: Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 10:43 pm
by pillwenney
It wasn't that bad of an effort last night. It wasn't great. The second worst game in the Natt era so far, but it wasn't that bad. The Spurs played very well.
Re: Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 2:33 am
by KingInExile
ICMTM wrote:Maybe Ron Artest was that good? Kevin missed time last year, too and we were almost a .500 team Sorry KIE, but my game thread titles have a tabloid style to them. I think I was high when I said 28 wins this year. I'm going to lower that to 23.
I seem to remember me saying something like 60 wins...I may have been intoxicated at the time.
Re: Sac @ SA...Kings win by 20!
Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 5:35 am
by SacKingZZZ
ICMTM wrote:Maybe Ron Artest was that good? Kevin missed time last year, too and we were almost a .500 team Sorry KIE, but my game thread titles have a tabloid style to them. I think I was high when I said 28 wins this year. I'm going to lower that to 23.
Hey, I said the same thing. I though it was mediocrity all the way! But it turns out we might be saved by the injury bug for real this time!
