Who do you want to be traded first?

norcal07 · Post #1 » by **norcal07** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:20 pm

There are has been trade speculations around both Brad Miller and John Salmons. Who do you want to be traded first Miller or Salmons?

I personally think that we need to get rid of Brad Miller. Obviously the Kings WAY over paid him, and he's fall off (especially this year) over the past couple of years. I don't know how much value he has left but he would be a great addition to a team like Cleveland.

deNIEd · Post #2 » by **deNIEd** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:21 pm

Kind of pointless to trade just one. If one goes, both have to go.

Just getting rid of Miller will only give us about 6-7 mil in cap space to work with. Which is pretty much good for nothing.

bflewis · Post #3 » by **bflewis** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:56 pm

I'd rather see beno go first!

Bac2Basics · Post #4 » by **Bac2Basics** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:09 pm

bflewis wrote:I'd rather see beno go first!

You beat me to it.

SacKingZZZ · Post #5 » by **SacKingZZZ** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:24 pm

Probably Miller just so it clears time for Hawes. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see him not moved at all though.

chriswebb86 · Post #6 » by **chriswebb86** » Sun Feb 1, 2009 1:06 am

Honestly, I really think it depends on what direction we want to go. If we move Salmons for exp then I think Miller is going to be moved right after that. However, I could see us just moving Miller. So if I had a choice I would say I either want Salmons or Beno gone first.

Website · Post #7 » by **Nicky Nix Nook** » Sun Feb 1, 2009 2:39 am

The last year Adelman was a coaching I heard his son say that Brad Miller is someone on the Kings that will not be traded and he will stay in Sac until retirement. I don't think that's true but he was right about everything else during those times: Artest trade, Bibby trade, etc.

I really hope he was wrong.

Smills91 · Post #8 » by **Smills91** » Sun Feb 1, 2009 3:07 am

Rumors about Beno to and I'll choose him to go first.

Post #9 » by **ICMTM** » Sun Feb 1, 2009 3:12 am

I wanted Brad Miller gone before Webber, Peja, Bibby and Artest!

Post #10 » by **KF10** » Sun Feb 1, 2009 3:26 am

ICMTM wrote:I wanted Brad Miller gone before Webber, Peja, Bibby and Artest!

rofl

After his first season and a half with the Kings? IMO he played really, really well for us. His defense was actually solid!

The only time I kinda wanted him gone in the past was his lackluster season (06-07). He was overweight, unmotivated and etc... But then again, he dedicated himself to basketball and he looked great last year...But this year, it is kinda different.

Inc · Post #11 » by **Inc** » Sun Feb 1, 2009 6:59 am

Beno.. like someone on the trade board said, he is the next Marcus Banks, contract wise.. maybe even worst, since he gets paid more

RIPskaterdude · Post #12 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Sun Feb 1, 2009 8:17 am

Everyone and anyone except for JT, Hawes, and Martin.

dozencousins · Post #13 » by **dozencousins** » Mon Feb 2, 2009 7:19 am

I think this 3 team trade would make a ton of sense

To SACRAMENTO = S.Marion (this could be just Marion by himself or Marion & S.parker from the Heat
To Miami = B.MILLER & Stackhouse
To DALLAS = Beno

thoughts ??????????????????????

mapko81 · Post #14 » by **mapko81** » Mon Feb 2, 2009 8:09 am

^ Why would Dallas sacrifice cap space for Beno to be their future PG? Barea is much cheaper and more useful (and even Terry can play the position). Sticking him to Miami in exchange for Marcus Banks is probably easier.

dozencousins · Post #15 » by **dozencousins** » Mon Feb 2, 2009 8:26 am

If Dallas really wanted Terry to be the startin PG in the future or Barea they would not be attempting to trade for a PG now would they ?
right mapko81 ? i guess you dont know what your talking about then......

mapko81 · Post #16 » by **mapko81** » Mon Feb 2, 2009 10:08 pm

That doesn't change the fact that they (and probably the 29 other teams in the league) can do a lot better than Beno Udrih as their PG of the future.

SacTown Kings · Post #17 » by **SacTown Kings** » Mon Feb 2, 2009 11:02 pm

^^^ You would think, but for some reason according to certain articles Dallas is interested in Beno. Mav fans aren't denying it they are just saying only if they trade Carrol.

cdt3 · Post #18 » by **cdt3** » Tue Feb 3, 2009 12:52 am

It is not Miller's fault. When Miller came here it was CWebb (20/10/4/2) and Miller (15/10/4/1) with Bibby (19/5) running the point in our crucial positions for our offense. The last 2 years it has been Mikki Moore (4/4 performance per night) and Millers (stats are still around 13/10/4/1) and Beno (12/3). You are blaming this on Miller? Is that who you would want in a battle showdown? Mikki Moore and Beno?
He has the same stats Vlade had when he started here at the same age. If Bibby was still here to make up for Brad and Martin's choking like he did for CWebb Vlade, and Peja we would still be in the playoffs. People always wanted Hedo to start ahead of Vlade but Vlade was the name and vet and started. Honestly Hawes needs to shut up and play when he is called upon quit making excuses, if he takes advantange of opportunities he will get Miller's spot but he has to be patient. This team has a lot of youth and getting rid if the only (KMart is only 26) vet who knows the offense is tough especially since Portland right now is begging for a veteran with so many young player. You need a mix of vets and youth. If we force Miller out it also kills his trade value and we will get very little. We should probably wait until the offseason to move him and KT since they will be expirings and worth more or let them Brad hang around depending on our draft pick. I agree they should be playing the youth more minutes even JT, Hawes, Greene and Williams, winning is not really important at this point. Salmons I would move only if the price is right (like Charlie Villanueva or Jerryd Bayless) there will be many SF Free agents next year (Kleiza and Hedo) and many in the draft for our Houston pick.

nykfan · Post #19 » by **nykfan** » Tue Feb 3, 2009 1:02 am

What would Kings fans think about a trade like this:

Miller, Moore, and Thomas

FOR

Marbury and Jeffries

The Kings would free up $20 million for this offseason and the Knicks would have extra cap room for the 2010 offseason.

Post #20 » by **KingInExile** » Tue Feb 3, 2009 2:11 am

nykfan wrote:What would Kings fans think about a trade like this:

Miller, Moore, and Thomas

FOR

Marbury and Jeffries

The Kings would free up $20 million for this offseason and the Knicks would have extra cap room for the 2010 offseason.

viewtopic.php?p=18415339#p18415339

I'm closing this thread down since it is just turning into a duplicate of other existing trade idea threads.