Page 1 of 1

Channing Frye?

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:23 am
by SactownHrtBrks8
If he comes for about 9 million over 2 years I don't think he would be a bad pickup as a backup big

Re: Channing Frye?

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:44 am
by KF10
I highly doubt it.

It is known that he does not like Sacramento for a while. And besides, his style of play, while considering the team's direction isn't really great IMO.

Re: Channing Frye?

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:59 am
by down_el_road
we dont need a soft big man who only shoots jumpers anymore.

Re: Channing Frye?

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:17 am
by wd707
Yuck channing frye. Are you serious?

Re: Channing Frye?

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:20 am
by SactownHrtBrks8
I forgot about his hate of Sacramento, I guess thats a no go

Re: Channing Frye?

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:26 am
by KM44
^Hahaha, minute detail. Plus he isn't the exact mold of a body-banger that we would look for.

Re: Channing Frye?

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:41 am
by SacKingZZZ
My nightmare is such a scenario. Literally a one dimensional jumpshooting big. A good one, but provides NOTHING else. Think Brad Miller without the passing. No thanks.

Re: Channing Frye?

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:34 pm
by perezident
Im really of the impression that he'll be a king though.. sigh

Ideally it should be Bass though

Re: Channing Frye?

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:02 pm
by rwheeler
NO THANKS! Hopefully this doesn't happen. I'm pretty sure Petrie is really looking to add a big body to help out defensively and bring some more toughness to the team. Frye just doesn't make sense in that regard.

Re: Channing Frye?

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:59 pm
by cdt3
I think we would take Diogu for less than $3mil over Frye at $4.5mil for an offensive backup. I don't know who we would want as a defensive backup, I think that's why we drafted Brockman. I think Rodriguez and the cheapest guys available as the 11/12/13 guys. I think we will keep Simmons as one because of his shotblocking at least in practice.

I see us spending our money on one pretty complete big not a defensive or offensive guy maybe Kleiza he is 6'8" and only plays off the bench because of Melo. I think he and Diogu are very similar although I have seen Kleiza hit 1 game winner for the bronze winning Lithuanian team in the Olympics. I think he adds clutchness and mental toughness to the bigs a little more than Diogu.

If you want to be a contender you need address the clutchness problem that was very severe last year with all the youth. Which was why we added Evans and the only other clutch G BJax likely won't be back so we have to add another clutch role player or 2 so we can squeak out close ones.

Re: Channing Frye?

Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:17 pm
by Nicky Nix Nook
I'd take Mikki "4 and 4" Moore over Frye

Re: Channing Frye?

Posted: Wed Jul 1, 2009 2:39 am
by Dustin5566
Why does he hate Sacramento?

Re: Channing Frye?

Posted: Wed Jul 1, 2009 2:47 am
by Smills91
Dustin5566 wrote:Why does he hate Sacramento?


He got shut down by some chick downtown and his teammates wouldn't let it go....

Re: Channing Frye?

Posted: Wed Jul 1, 2009 6:47 am
by dub010
We really dont want/need Channing

Re: Channing Frye?

Posted: Wed Jul 1, 2009 3:32 pm
by UKF
No to Channing Frye. No

Dude is as ugly as his game