Page 1 of 2
Marbury
Posted: Sat Jul 4, 2009 7:20 pm
by hbhakta
Washington coach Flip Saunders and Marbury, who spent time together in Minnesota, are intrigued about hooking up again. The Kings are believed to be interested in Marbury as well.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/07042009/sp ... 177540.htmWhat do you guys think?
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sat Jul 4, 2009 7:22 pm
by Bac2Basics
I wouldn't trade Beno Udrih for Stephon Marbury, terrible idea.
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sat Jul 4, 2009 7:22 pm
by diogo_pt
i don't believe
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sat Jul 4, 2009 7:24 pm
by diogo_pt
and this is impossible...we have Evans, Beno, Sergio...why another PG? and even if we get another player to play it, it will not be Stephon freaking Marbury
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sat Jul 4, 2009 7:28 pm
by KF10
Over the years, one thing I learned between NY and news.
NY papers are mostly speculative.
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sat Jul 4, 2009 7:54 pm
by KingInExile
hbhakta wrote:Washington coach Flip Saunders and Marbury, who spent time together in Minnesota, are intrigued about hooking up again. The Kings are believed to be interested in Marbury as well.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/07042009/sp ... 177540.htmWhat do you guys think?
I think the only NBA writer with possibly less brains than Peter Vescey is Marc Berman. I seriously doubt that the Kings have any real interest in Marbury.
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sat Jul 4, 2009 7:57 pm
by KM44
This is a joke. Don't worry about it.
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sat Jul 4, 2009 8:05 pm
by JSrose115
i would take marbury over beno anyday
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sat Jul 4, 2009 8:34 pm
by Draino
JSrose115 wrote:i would take marbury over beno anyday
am i a huge marbury fan at this point of his career? no
would i prefer marbury over beno at this point of their respective careers'? (or any other point of their lives).... HELL YEA
if we can find a way to dump beno, i would love to have steph as the replacement
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sat Jul 4, 2009 10:25 pm
by cdt3
With Bobby Jackson probably not coming back we do need one vet leader G.
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sat Jul 4, 2009 10:38 pm
by SacKingZZZ
"leader" and "Stephon Marbury" don't exactly go together if you catch my drift.
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sat Jul 4, 2009 11:02 pm
by KM44
I would take marbury over beno as well, but unless beno is willing to take a $0 severance package, I doubt we even call marbury.
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sun Jul 5, 2009 2:10 am
by Smills91
KingInExile wrote:hbhakta wrote:Washington coach Flip Saunders and Marbury, who spent time together in Minnesota, are intrigued about hooking up again. The Kings are believed to be interested in Marbury as well.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/07042009/sp ... 177540.htmWhat do you guys think?
I think the only NBA writer with possibly less brains than Peter Vescey is Marc Berman. I seriously doubt that the Kings have any real interest in Marbury.
Oh man, if we're talking most idiotic sports writers. Ailene Voison needs to be in the conversation, as well as Sam Smith.
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sun Jul 5, 2009 4:35 am
by SadKingsFan
All i can do is laugh at this garbage. Makes no sense for us whatsoever. Petrie would NEVER sign a player like Marbury, especially at this point in his career.
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sun Jul 5, 2009 5:35 am
by dub010
I hate beno as much as the next guy, but still say not to steph
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sun Jul 5, 2009 7:39 pm
by OGSactownballer
What a joke!
Can you EVER see Geoff Petrie - the ultimate chemistry GM - even THINKING about a cancer like usedtobestarbury?
Please, this isn't even worth acknowledging - other than as a frightening thought!
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sun Jul 5, 2009 7:54 pm
by Nicky Nix Nook
Ya he only focuses on acquiring high class, good chemistry players like Ron Artest....

Re: Marbury
Posted: Sun Jul 5, 2009 7:57 pm
by OGSactownballer
It's unfortunate that the Maloofs ran off Adelman, because in case you hadn't noticed - he NEVER had the problems with headcases. That was one of the strengths of the Petrie/Adelman combo - Geoff knew that he could give a guy like Ron to Rick and he would get him to buy into the program. He moved him as soon as it was obvious that Musselman and he did not work together.
Re: Marbury
Posted: Thu Jul 9, 2009 2:48 am
by Draino
You know what if we could get rid of BeNO I would rather have Iverson than anyone at the point, why? This team only had 1 PRESEASON game and 0 SEASON games on national TV, we need some recognition around the league, thats why we need a star/fading star on this team... for that reason ONLY (I mean would you rather have beeeeno for his ugly contract or AI for 1yr/5mil?
Re: Marbury
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 5:26 pm
by UKF
If this was any other Marbury I would think maybe we could get em. But it's STEPHON Marbury so I'm thinking no on adding him to our roster..